Comparative Environmental Evaluation of Sewage Sludge Treatment and Aggregate Production Process by Life Cycle Assessment

被引:4
|
作者
Yang, Seong-Jun [1 ]
Eom, Ji-Young [1 ]
Lee, Myung-Jin [1 ]
Hwang, Dae-Hwan [1 ]
Park, Won-Bin [1 ]
Wie, Young-Min [2 ]
Lee, Ki-Gang [2 ]
Lee, Kang-Hoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Energy & Environm Engn, 43 Jibong Ro, Bucheon 14662, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Kyonggi Univ, Dept Mat Engn, Suwon 16227, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
life cycle assessment; sewage sludge; lightweight aggregate; waste recycling; resource circulation; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; WASTE-WATER; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; ENERGY; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/su16010226
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the environmental impact of landfill, incineration, and lightweight aggregate production for sewage sludge management techniques and compared the utilization of sewage-produced lightweight aggregates with natural aggregates in terms of building material production. Two scenarios were established for the life cycle assessment (LCA) of the sludge and associated product that was carried out after sludge generation. Sludge incineration and landfill deposition includes emissions from the drying, transportation, incineration of sludge, and landfill, and the production of lightweight aggregates and natural aggregates includes transportation to manufacturing facilities, the manufacturing processes themselves, and transportation of the produced aggregates to construction sites. We calculated the amount of pollutant emissions for each process in each scenario and analyzed the environmental impact index considering the environmental impact of each pollutant using the Open LCA program. The parameters used for the environmental impact index analysis for sludge management are potential acidification, climate change, eutrophication potential, human toxicity, photochemical oxidation, and stratospheric ozone depletion. The environmental impact values of lightweight aggregates (LWA) are GWP 100 441 kg CO2_Eq, AP 2.73 x 10-2 kg SO2_Eq, EP 4.46 x 10-3 kg PO4-_Eq, HTP 4.15 x 10-2 kg, 1,4-DCB_Eq, POCP 1.64 x 10-3 kg CH4_Eq, and ODP 3.41 x 10-7 kg CFC-11_Eq. We found that these values were low compared to landfill and incineration as a sewage sludge disposal method and compared to natural aggregate as a construction material production method. The environmental impact index analysis during LCA of lightweight aggregates produced from the sludge verified its positive environmental impact compared to the other potential methods of sludge management.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In quest of environmental hotspots of sewage sludge treatment combining anaerobic digestion and mechanical dewatering: A life cycle assessment approach
    Gourdet, Claire
    Girault, Romain
    Berthault, Sarah
    Richard, Marion
    Tosoni, Julian
    Pradel, Marilys
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 : 1123 - 1136
  • [32] Comparative life cycle assessment of landfill sludge treatment technologies in China
    Liu S.
    Liu H.
    Wei G.
    Zhu Y.
    Zhao H.
    Shi H.
    Lian Y.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (28) : 41208 - 41220
  • [33] Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sewage Sludge and Its Products Valorization Pathways
    Mannarino, G.
    Caffaz, S.
    Gori, R.
    Lombardi, L.
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2022, 13 (09) : 3845 - 3864
  • [34] Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sewage Sludge and Its Products Valorization Pathways
    G. Mannarino
    S. Caffaz
    R. Gori
    L. Lombardi
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2022, 13 : 3845 - 3864
  • [35] The generation of CO2 in sewage sludge treatment systems:: life cycle assessment
    Hwang, Y
    Hanaki, K
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (08) : 107 - 113
  • [36] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of HTC Concepts Valorizing Sewage Sludge for Energetic and Agricultural Use
    Meisel, Kathleen
    Clemens, Andreas
    Fuehner, Christoph
    Breulmann, Marc
    Majer, Stefan
    Thraen, Daniela
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (05)
  • [37] Economic Process Evaluation and Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment of Bio-Aromatics Production
    Kromer, Jens O.
    Ferreira, Rafael G.
    Petrides, Demetri
    Kohlheb, Norbert
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 8
  • [38] Environmental sustainability practice of sewage sludge and low-rank coal co-pyrolysis: A comparative life cycle assessment study
    Zhou, Jinyang
    Li, Mingyue
    Han, Xue
    Wang, Beili
    Zhang, Chen
    Cheng, Zhiwen
    Shen, Zhemin
    Ogugua, Paul Chinonso
    Zhou, Chao
    Pan, Xiaolei
    Yang, Fan
    Yuan, Tao
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 928
  • [39] Enhancement of biogas production from food waste and sewage sludge - Environmental and economic life cycle performance
    Eriksson, Ola
    Bisaillon, Mattias
    Haraldsson, Marten
    Sundberg, Johan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 175 : 33 - 39
  • [40] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF SEWAGE SLUDGE PYROLYSIS: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF BIOCHAR AS CARBON SEQUESTRATOR AND NUTRIENT RECYCLER
    Gievers, Fabian
    Loewen, Achim
    Nelles, Michael
    DETRITUS, 2021, 16 : 94 - 105