Machine Learning Models for the Identification of Prognostic and Predictive Cancer Biomarkers: A Systematic Review

被引:39
|
作者
Al-Tashi, Qasem [1 ]
Saad, Maliazurina B. [1 ]
Muneer, Amgad [1 ]
Qureshi, Rizwan [1 ]
Mirjalili, Seyedali [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sheshadri, Ajay [5 ]
Le, Xiuning [6 ]
Vokes, Natalie I. [6 ]
Zhang, Jianjun [6 ]
Wu, Jia [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Torrens Univ Australia, Ctr Artificial Intelligence Res & Optimizat, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
[3] Yonsei Univ, Yonsei Frontier Lab, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[4] Obuda Univ, Univ Res & Innovat Ctr, H-1034 Budapest, Hungary
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pulm Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Head & Neck Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
personalized medicine; biomarker discovery; predictive biomarker; prognostic biomarker; subgroup identification; machine learning; deep learning; feature selection; SUBGROUP IDENTIFICATION; FEATURE-SELECTION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.3390/ijms24097781
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The identification of biomarkers plays a crucial role in personalized medicine, both in the clinical and research settings. However, the contrast between predictive and prognostic biomarkers can be challenging due to the overlap between the two. A prognostic biomarker predicts the future outcome of cancer, regardless of treatment, and a predictive biomarker predicts the effectiveness of a therapeutic intervention. Misclassifying a prognostic biomarker as predictive (or vice versa) can have serious financial and personal consequences for patients. To address this issue, various statistical and machine learning approaches have been developed. The aim of this study is to present an in-depth analysis of recent advancements, trends, challenges, and future prospects in biomarker identification. A systematic search was conducted using PubMed to identify relevant studies published between 2017 and 2023. The selected studies were analyzed to better understand the concept of biomarker identification, evaluate machine learning methods, assess the level of research activity, and highlight the application of these methods in cancer research and treatment. Furthermore, existing obstacles and concerns are discussed to identify prospective research areas. We believe that this review will serve as a valuable resource for researchers, providing insights into the methods and approaches used in biomarker discovery and identifying future research opportunities.
引用
收藏
页数:42
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Resveratrol in animal models of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: A systematic review with machine learning
    Cai, Wenhao
    Li, Ziyu
    Wang, Wen
    Liu, Shiyu
    Li, Yuying
    Sun, Xin
    Sutton, Robert
    Deng, Lihui
    Liu, Tingting
    Xia, Qing
    Huang, Wei
    PHYTOMEDICINE, 2025, 139
  • [42] Machine Learning as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool for Predicting Thrombosis in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
    El-Sherbini, Adham H.
    Coroneos, Stefania
    Zidan, Ali
    Othman, Maha
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2024, 50 (06): : 809 - 816
  • [43] Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
    Dhiman, Paula
    Ma, Jie
    Navarro, Constanza L. Andaur
    Speich, Benjamin
    Bullock, Garrett
    Damen, Johanna A. A.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Kirtley, Shona
    Riley, Richard D.
    Van Calster, Ben
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    Collins, Gary S.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [44] Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
    Paula Dhiman
    Jie Ma
    Constanza L. Andaur Navarro
    Benjamin Speich
    Garrett Bullock
    Johanna A. A. Damen
    Lotty Hooft
    Shona Kirtley
    Richard D. Riley
    Ben Van Calster
    Karel G. M. Moons
    Gary S. Collins
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22
  • [45] Predictive Biomarkers for Checkpoint Blockade in Urothelial Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Lavoie, Jean-Michel
    Black, Peter C.
    Eigl, Bernhard J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 202 (01): : 49 - 56
  • [46] Predictive and prognostic cancer biomarkers revisited
    Pritzker, Kenneth P. H.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2015, 15 (08) : 971 - 974
  • [47] Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in prostate cancer
    Kontos, Christos K.
    Adamopoulos, Panagiotis G.
    Scorilas, Andreas
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2015, 15 (12) : 1567 - 1576
  • [48] Encoding Conceptual Models for Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
    Ali, Syed Juned
    Gavric, Aleksandar
    Proper, Henderik
    Bork, Dominik
    2023 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODEL DRIVEN ENGINEERING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS COMPANION, MODELS-C, 2023, : 562 - 570
  • [49] Machine Learning Models for Parkinson Disease: Systematic Review
    Tabashum, Thasina
    Snyder, Robert Cooper
    O'Brien, Megan K.
    Albert, Mark, V
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 12
  • [50] Operationalizing Machine Learning Models - A Systematic Literature Review
    Kolltveit, Ask Berstad
    Li, Jingyue
    2022 IEEE/ACM 1ST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING FOR RESPONSIBLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (SE4RAI 2022), 2022, : 1 - 8