Machine Learning Models for the Identification of Prognostic and Predictive Cancer Biomarkers: A Systematic Review

被引:39
|
作者
Al-Tashi, Qasem [1 ]
Saad, Maliazurina B. [1 ]
Muneer, Amgad [1 ]
Qureshi, Rizwan [1 ]
Mirjalili, Seyedali [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sheshadri, Ajay [5 ]
Le, Xiuning [6 ]
Vokes, Natalie I. [6 ]
Zhang, Jianjun [6 ]
Wu, Jia [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Torrens Univ Australia, Ctr Artificial Intelligence Res & Optimizat, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
[3] Yonsei Univ, Yonsei Frontier Lab, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[4] Obuda Univ, Univ Res & Innovat Ctr, H-1034 Budapest, Hungary
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pulm Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Head & Neck Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
personalized medicine; biomarker discovery; predictive biomarker; prognostic biomarker; subgroup identification; machine learning; deep learning; feature selection; SUBGROUP IDENTIFICATION; FEATURE-SELECTION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.3390/ijms24097781
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The identification of biomarkers plays a crucial role in personalized medicine, both in the clinical and research settings. However, the contrast between predictive and prognostic biomarkers can be challenging due to the overlap between the two. A prognostic biomarker predicts the future outcome of cancer, regardless of treatment, and a predictive biomarker predicts the effectiveness of a therapeutic intervention. Misclassifying a prognostic biomarker as predictive (or vice versa) can have serious financial and personal consequences for patients. To address this issue, various statistical and machine learning approaches have been developed. The aim of this study is to present an in-depth analysis of recent advancements, trends, challenges, and future prospects in biomarker identification. A systematic search was conducted using PubMed to identify relevant studies published between 2017 and 2023. The selected studies were analyzed to better understand the concept of biomarker identification, evaluate machine learning methods, assess the level of research activity, and highlight the application of these methods in cancer research and treatment. Furthermore, existing obstacles and concerns are discussed to identify prospective research areas. We believe that this review will serve as a valuable resource for researchers, providing insights into the methods and approaches used in biomarker discovery and identifying future research opportunities.
引用
收藏
页数:42
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical implication of prognostic and predictive biomarkers for castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Tian, Shengri
    Lei, Zhen
    Gong, Zuo
    Sun, Zhonghai
    Xu, Dongyuan
    Piao, Minhu
    CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [22] Machine Learning-Based Predictive Models for Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
    Danilatou, Vasiliki
    Dimopoulos, Dimitrios
    Kostoulas, Theodoros
    Douketis, James
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2024, 124 (11) : 1040 - 1052
  • [23] HOW MACHINE LEARNING CAN CONTRIBUTE TO PROGNOSTIC AND PREDICTIVE MODELS
    Nazha, Aziz
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 2021, 108 : S56 - S56
  • [24] Predictive biomarkers in radioresistant rectal cancer: A systematic review
    Slipsager, Anna
    Henrichsen, Sofie N.
    Falkmer, Ursula G.
    Dybkaer, Karen
    Belting, Mattias
    Poulsen, Laurids O.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2023, 186
  • [25] Predictive Biomarkers in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Ruiz-Banobre, Juan
    Kandimalla, Raju
    Goel, Ajay
    JCO PRECISION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 3
  • [26] Social determinants of health in prognostic machine learning models for orthopaedic outcomes: A systematic review
    Lans, Amanda
    Kanbier, Laura N.
    Bernstein, David N.
    Groot, Olivier Q.
    Ogink, Paul T.
    Tobert, Daniel G.
    Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan
    Schwab, Joseph H.
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 29 (02) : 292 - 299
  • [27] Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
    Dhiman, Paula
    Ma, Jie
    Navarro, Constanza L. Andaur
    Speich, Benjamin
    Bullock, Garrett
    Damen, Johanna A. A.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Kirtley, Shona
    Riley, Richard D.
    Van Calster, Ben
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    Collins, Gary S.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [28] Critical appraisal of machine learning prognostic models for acute pancreatitis: protocol for a systematic review
    Hassan, Amier
    Critelli, Brian
    Lahooti, Ila
    Lahooti, Ali
    Matzko, Nate
    Adams, Jan Niklas
    Liss, Lukas
    Quion, Justin
    Restrepo, David
    Nikahd, Melica
    Culp, Stacey
    Noh, Lydia
    Tong, Kathleen
    Park, Jun Sung
    Akshintala, Venkata
    Windsor, John A.
    Mull, Nikhil K.
    Papachristou, Georgios I.
    Celi, Leo Anthony
    Lee, Peter J.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [29] Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Cancer
    Nair, Meera
    Sandhu, Sardul Singh
    Sharma, Anil K.
    CURRENT CANCER DRUG TARGETS, 2014, 14 (05) : 477 - 504
  • [30] Genetic polymorphisms as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in gynecological cancers: A systematic review
    Diaz-Padilla, Ivan
    Amir, Eitan
    Marsh, Sharon
    Liu, Geoffrey
    Mackay, Helen
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 124 (02) : 354 - 365