Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal-onset seizures:A real-world experience in eastern China

被引:2
|
作者
Xu, Sha [1 ]
Xu, Zheng-yan-ran [1 ]
Zheng, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Miao, Pu [2 ]
Feng, Jianhua [2 ]
Guo, Yi [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Dept Neurol,Epilepsy Ctr, Hangzhou 310009, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Pediat, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Gen Practice & Int Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Key Lab Med Mol Imaging Zhejiang Prov, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310009, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Real-world; Perampanel; Monotherapy; Epilepsy; Efficacy; Safety;
D O I
10.1016/j.seizure.2023.06.024
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) monotherapy in real-world practice for the treatment of focal-onset seizures (FOS) in eastern China. Method: This is a single-center, retrospective study of patients with FOS, aged = 4 years, who had been prescribed PER as monotherapy. Outcomes included retention, seizure-free, and responder rates at 3, 6 and 12 months and adverse events (AEs) throughout the follow-up period. The efficacy and AEs of PER monotherapy in patients with aged < 14 years old and = 14 years old were also compared. Results: Sixty-seven patients with FOS who received PER monotherapy and completed a one-year follow-up were included in the analysis. The median maintenance dose was 4 mg. Modified intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated that the retention rates of PER monotherapy at follow-up of 3, 6 and 12months were 75%, 70% and 63%, respectively. At the same points, seizure-free rates of PER monotherapy were 69%, 63% and 52%, and responder rates were 69%, 66% and 61%, respectively. Patients with sleep-related seizures had higher seizure-free rates at 12 months of follow-up. No significant difference in seizure-free and responder rates was found between the aged < 14 years old and the aged = 14 years old. Twenty-one patients (31.3%) had AEs and five patients discontinued using PER because of intolerant AEs. Common AEs were dizziness, irritability and somnolence. The AEs rate in patients < 14 years was 17.9%, significantly lower than patients = 14 years. Conclusions: Our findings revealed the real-world data of patients in eastern China with FOS using PER as monotherapy. Patients had good retention, seizure-free and responder rates, and relatively low AEs rate at a low dose of PER treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 237
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety of adjunctive perampanel by titration/maintenance periods and dose in patients with focal-onset seizures: Post hoc analysis of the FAME study
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Kim, Ji Hyun
    Dash, Amitabh
    Lee, JiWoong
    Malhotra, Manoj
    EPILEPSIA, 2021, 62 : 43 - 44
  • [32] ELEVATE Study 410: Perampanel as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy in patients with focal-onset seizures or generalised tonic-clonic seizures: Analysis by patient age
    Punia, V.
    Samad, O.
    Kumar, D.
    Ngo, L. Y.
    Malhotra, M.
    EPILEPSIA, 2022, 63 : 137 - 138
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel 4 mg/day in patients aged 4-&lt;12 years with focal-onset seizures or generalised tonic-clonic seizures
    Moretz, Katherine
    Malhotra, Manoj
    Patten, Anna
    Ngo, Leock Y.
    EPILEPSIA, 2021, 62 : 269 - 269
  • [34] Sustained Seizure Freedom with Perampanel 4 mg/day Monotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed/Currently Untreated Focal-Onset Seizures: Study 342
    Kubota, Yuichi
    Kim, Ji Hyun
    Lim, Sung Chul
    Ninomiya, Hirotomo
    Yamamoto, Takamichi
    Patten, Anna
    Ngo, Leock Y.
    Malhotra, Manoj
    EPILEPSIA, 2021, 62 : 45 - 45
  • [35] Real-world experience with direct brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal onset seizures
    Razavi, Babak
    Rao, Vikram R.
    Lin, Christine
    Bujarski, Krzysztof A.
    Patra, Sanjay E.
    Burdette, David E.
    Geller, Eric B.
    Brown, Mesha-Gay M.
    Johnson, Emily A.
    Drees, Cornelia
    Chang, Edward F.
    Greenwood, Janet E.
    Heck, Christianne N.
    Jobst, Barbara C.
    Gwinn, Ryder P.
    Warner, Nicole M.
    Halpern, Casey H.
    EPILEPSIA, 2020, 61 (08) : 1749 - 1757
  • [36] Efficacy/Safety of Low-/High-Dose Perampanel as First Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Focal-Onset Seizures: Post Hoc Analysis of the FAME Study
    Seo, Dae Won
    Lee, JiWoong
    Dash, Amitabh
    Lee, Sang Kun
    Lee, Sang-Ahm
    Malhotra, Manoj
    EPILEPSIA, 2021, 62 : 51 - 51
  • [37] Perampanel Real World Experience: Efficacy And Safety In Indian Patients With Uncontrolled Epilepsy
    Agarwal, V. K.
    EPILEPSIA, 2019, 60 : 68 - 68
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of perampanel as early add-on therapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures: a multicenter, open-label, single-arm study
    Gao, Lehong
    Lu, Qiang
    Wang, Zan
    Yue, Wei
    Wang, Guoping
    Shao, Xiaoqiu
    Guo, Yi
    Yi, Yonghong
    Hong, Zhen
    Jiang, Yuwu
    Xiao, Bo
    Cui, Guiyun
    Gao, Feng
    Hu, Jiasheng
    Liang, Jianmin
    Zhang, Meiyun
    Wang, Yuping
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [39] Long-term safety and efficacy of adjunctive perampanel in pediatric patients (ages 4 to <12 years) with inadequately controlled focal-onset seizures or generalized tonic-clonic seizures
    Flamini, Robert
    Fogarasi, Andras
    Omatsu, Hirowo
    Milh, Mathieu
    Phillips, Steven
    Patten, Anna
    Takase, Takao
    Ngo, Leock Y.
    EPILEPSIA, 2025,
  • [40] ELEVATE Study 410: analysis of time to first seizure with perampanel as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy in patients with focal-onset seizures or generalised tonic-clonic seizures
    Klein, P.
    Samad, O.
    Ngo, L. Y.
    Kumar, D.
    Malhotra, M.
    EPILEPSIA, 2023, 64 : 295 - 296