Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal-onset seizures:A real-world experience in eastern China

被引:2
|
作者
Xu, Sha [1 ]
Xu, Zheng-yan-ran [1 ]
Zheng, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Miao, Pu [2 ]
Feng, Jianhua [2 ]
Guo, Yi [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Dept Neurol,Epilepsy Ctr, Hangzhou 310009, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Pediat, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Gen Practice & Int Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Key Lab Med Mol Imaging Zhejiang Prov, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310009, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Real-world; Perampanel; Monotherapy; Epilepsy; Efficacy; Safety;
D O I
10.1016/j.seizure.2023.06.024
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) monotherapy in real-world practice for the treatment of focal-onset seizures (FOS) in eastern China. Method: This is a single-center, retrospective study of patients with FOS, aged = 4 years, who had been prescribed PER as monotherapy. Outcomes included retention, seizure-free, and responder rates at 3, 6 and 12 months and adverse events (AEs) throughout the follow-up period. The efficacy and AEs of PER monotherapy in patients with aged < 14 years old and = 14 years old were also compared. Results: Sixty-seven patients with FOS who received PER monotherapy and completed a one-year follow-up were included in the analysis. The median maintenance dose was 4 mg. Modified intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated that the retention rates of PER monotherapy at follow-up of 3, 6 and 12months were 75%, 70% and 63%, respectively. At the same points, seizure-free rates of PER monotherapy were 69%, 63% and 52%, and responder rates were 69%, 66% and 61%, respectively. Patients with sleep-related seizures had higher seizure-free rates at 12 months of follow-up. No significant difference in seizure-free and responder rates was found between the aged < 14 years old and the aged = 14 years old. Twenty-one patients (31.3%) had AEs and five patients discontinued using PER because of intolerant AEs. Common AEs were dizziness, irritability and somnolence. The AEs rate in patients < 14 years was 17.9%, significantly lower than patients = 14 years. Conclusions: Our findings revealed the real-world data of patients in eastern China with FOS using PER as monotherapy. Patients had good retention, seizure-free and responder rates, and relatively low AEs rate at a low dose of PER treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 237
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel Monotherapy in Patients Aged ≥12 to &lt;18 Years with Newly Diagnosed/currently Untreated Recurrent Focal-onset Seizures (FOS): FREEDOM Study 342
    Ngo, Leock Y.
    Kim, Ji Hyun
    Lim, Sung Chul
    Yamamoto, Takamichi
    Patten, Anna
    Malhotra, Manoj
    PEDIATRICS, 2022, 149 (01)
  • [22] Design of Study 603: A multicentre, retrospective study in patients from korea with focal-onset seizures who converted to perampanel monotherapy
    Seo, D. W.
    Lee, J. W.
    Lee, Y.
    Lee, W. G.
    EPILEPSIA, 2022, 63 : 129 - 129
  • [23] Efficacy and safety of Cenobamate in adult patients with uncontrolled focal seizures: a real-world study
    Pietrafusa, Nicola
    La Neve, Angela
    Falcicchio, Giovanni
    Calabrese, Costanza
    Giuffrida, Andrea
    Renzetti, Tommaso
    Tondo, Ilaria
    Cappelletti, Simona
    Vigevano, Federico
    Specchio, Nicola
    EPILEPSIA, 2021, 62 : 165 - 165
  • [24] Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures (FOS): Post Hoc Analysis of FAME by Dose and First-Line Antiepileptic Drug
    Kim, Min Young
    Malhotra, Manoj
    Dash, Amitabh
    Lee, JiWoong
    EPILEPSIA, 2021, 62 : 40 - 41
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal-onset seizures with newly diagnosed epilepsy or recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission: The open-label Study 342 (FREEDOM Study)
    Yamamoto, Takamichi
    Lim, Sung Chul
    Ninomiya, Hirotomo
    Kubota, Yuichi
    Shin, Won Chul
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Shin, Dong Jin
    Hoshida, Tohru
    Iida, Koji
    Ochiai, Taku
    Matsunaga, Risa
    Higashiyama, Hiroyuki
    Hiramatsu, Hidetaka
    Kim, Ji Hyun
    EPILEPSIA OPEN, 2020, 5 (02) : 274 - 284
  • [26] Effectiveness, Safety and Tolerability of Perampanel in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients with Focal-Onset and Generalized-Onset Seizures: Evidence from Clinical Practice
    Auvin, S.
    Garcia-Ron, A.
    Gil-Lopez, F.
    Shankar, R.
    Yamamoto, T.
    Ngo, L.
    Villanueva, V.
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 92 : S97 - S97
  • [27] Perampanel Monotherapy Beyond Initial Titration to Achieve Seizure Freedom in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures: Post Hoc Analysis of Study 342
    Husni, Ryan Edbert
    Ngo, Leock Y.
    Patten, Anna
    Hiramatsu, Hidetaka
    Watanabe, Kazuaki
    Senokuchi, Hirofumi
    Yamamoto, Takamichi
    EPILEPSIA, 2021, 62 : 54 - 55
  • [28] An Evidence-Based Review On The Use Of Perampanel For The Treatment Of Focal-Onset Seizures In Pediatric Patients
    Dozieres-Puyravel, Blandine
    Auvin, Stephane
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2019, 15 : 2789 - 2797
  • [29] Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Perampanel in Elderly Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures by Concomitant Anti-Seizure Medication (ASM) Use
    Marawar, Rohit
    Leppik, Ilo E.
    Wechsler, Robert T.
    Patten, Anna
    Ngo, Leock Y.
    Malhotra, Manoj
    EPILEPSIA, 2021, 62 : 53 - 54
  • [30] A retrospective, real world experienced of perampanel monotherapy in patient with first new onset focal seizure: A Thailand experience
    Chinvarun, Yotin
    EPILEPSIA, 2021, 62 : 71 - 72