NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF PROTON BACKSCATTERING SPECTRA IN GEANT4 TOOLKIT

被引:0
|
作者
Lingis, D. [1 ]
Gaspariunas, M. [1 ]
Kovalevskij, V. [1 ]
Plukis, A. [1 ]
Remeikis, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Phys Sci & Technol, Savanoriu 231, LT-02300 Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
LITHUANIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS | 2024年 / 64卷 / 01期
关键词
Rutherford backscattering; GEANT4; simulations; backscattering spectra; protons; CHANNELING SPECTRA; THIN-FILMS; RBS; RESOLUTION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3952/physics.2024.64.1.5
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS) is a widely used technique for the atomic-scale analysis of sample composition, lattice displacement and impurity profiling. RBS is based on the elastic scattering of incident charged particles by target nuclei and the subsequent detection of scattered particles. The interpretation of RBS spectra, however, poses challenges due to overlapping peaks, corresponding to scattering from different atomic species, and uncertainties from energy loss, scattering geometry and detector response. To address this, an open source simulation model based on the versatile GEANT4 simulation toolkit has been developed. The flexibility of the open source enables users to tailor the model to its specific requirements, such as the use of specific particle stopping powers, cross-sections, and physics processes. This work presents the results of the comparison between the experimental and simulated backscattering spectra in crystalline silicon, silicon carbide and silicon dioxide samples by 1-2.5 MeV energy protons, obtained in random orientation conditions. The results demonstrate the capability of the model to accurately simulate backscattering spectra in both amorphous materials and single crystals. The overall agreement between the simulated and experimental results is highly promising for future development and use in the interpretation and simulation of RBS spectra.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 57
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preliminary test of Bragg application for proton therapy using the Geant4 toolkit
    Loffredo, Filomena
    Pugliese, Mariagabriella
    NUOVO CIMENTO C-COLLOQUIA AND COMMUNICATIONS IN PHYSICS, 2018, 41 (06):
  • [22] Verification of the dose distributions with GEANT4 simulation for proton therapy
    Aso, T
    Kimura, A
    Tanaka, S
    Yoshida, H
    Kanematsu, N
    Sasaki, T
    Akagi, T
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2005, 52 (04) : 896 - 901
  • [23] Study of proton computed tomography using GEANT4 simulation
    Aso, Tsukasa
    Fujisaka, Katsuhiko
    2007 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-11, 2007, : 876 - 879
  • [24] Verification of the dose distributions with GEANT4 simulation for proton therapy
    Aso, T
    Kimura, A
    Tanaka, S
    Yoshida, H
    Kanematsu, N
    Sasaki, T
    Akagi, T
    2004 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 2138 - 2142
  • [25] Proton pencil beam dose distribution simulation by Geant4
    Yang, Y
    Coutrakon, G
    Wang, N
    Shahnazi, K
    Miller, D
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1520 - 1520
  • [26] GEANT4 simulation of exit energy in proton medical imaging
    Silva, R. C. L.
    Denyak, V.
    Schelin, H. R.
    Hoff, G.
    Paschuk, S. A.
    Setti, J. A. P.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2020, 167
  • [27] Monte Carlo simulation of the CENBG microbeam and nanobeam lines with the Geant4 toolkit
    Incerti, S.
    Zhang, Q.
    Andersson, F.
    Moretto, Ph.
    Grime, G. W.
    Merchant, M. J.
    Nguyen, D. T.
    Habchi, C.
    Pouthier, T.
    Seznec, H.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2007, 260 (01): : 20 - 27
  • [28] Heavy-particle energy loss simulation using the Geant4 toolkit
    A. V. Bagulya
    M. S. Vladimirov
    V. N. Ivanchenko
    N. I. Starkov
    Bulletin of the Lebedev Physics Institute, 2009, 36 : 127 - 134
  • [30] The Geant4 simulation toolkit and its low energy electromagnetic physics package
    Chauvie, S
    Ivanchenko, V
    Longo, F
    Santin, G
    Nieminen, P
    Pia, MG
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1231 - 1231