共 50 条
Comprehensive performance analysis of cold storage Rankine Carnot batteries: Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental perspectives
被引:20
|作者:
Xia, Rui
[1
]
Wang, Zhe
[1
,2
,4
]
Cao, Menglong
[1
]
Jiang, Yuemao
[3
]
Tang, Haobo
[1
]
Ji, Yulong
[1
]
Han, Fenghui
[1
,2
,4
]
机构:
[1] Dalian Maritime Univ, Marine Engn Coll, Dalian 116026, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Maritime Univ, Natl Ctr Int Res Subsea Engn Technol & Equipment, Dalian 116026, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Turbomachinery, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Ctr Int Res Subsea Engn Technol & Equipment, Dalian 116026, Peoples R China
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
Rankine Carnot batteries;
Ice storage;
Waste heat;
4E analyses;
System comparison;
E power generation (kWh);
THERMAL-ENERGY;
THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS;
LEVELIZED COST;
HEAT;
OPTIMIZATION;
SYSTEM;
FLUID;
D O I:
10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117485
中图分类号:
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Rankine Carnot batteries have demonstrated promise as a viable solution for electricity storage due to their high energy density at low temperatures. A specific variant of these batteries, known as the Cold Storage Rankine Carnot Battery (CSRCB), utilizes a vapor compression refrigeration (VCR) unit to store cold energy at subambient temperatures. In this paper, three different configurations of CSRCB are constructed: the Basic CSRCB (B-CSRCB), CSRCB with a recuperator in VCR (R-CSRCB), and CSRCB with a recuperator in VCR and a preheater in ORC (RP-CSRCB). The system is analyzed from four perspectives: energy, exergy, economic, and environmental (4E). The impact of key parameters, such as heat source temperature, ambient temperature, and pinch point temperature, on the system's performance is evaluated. The results indicate that the RP-CSCBR configuration outperforms others in terms of energy, exergy, and economic analysis. The evaporator in ORC-subsystem is the component with the largest exergy loss. When the three configurations of CSRCB achieve the maximum exergy efficiency under different conditions, the ORC-subsystem evaporator accounts for 41.9 %, 41.9 % and 17.6 % of the exergy loss of B-CSRCB, R-CSRCB and RP-CSRCB, respectively. The lowest levelized cost of storage (LCOS) can be obtained when the system is operating at high heat source temperature, low ambient temperature and small pinch temperature difference. The environment assessment results show that the changes of the key parameters of the system have different effects on the annual emission reduction (AER) and total equivalent warming impact (TEWI) of CSRCB with different configurations.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文