Comprehensive performance analysis of cold storage Rankine Carnot batteries: Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental perspectives

被引:20
|
作者
Xia, Rui [1 ]
Wang, Zhe [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Cao, Menglong [1 ]
Jiang, Yuemao [3 ]
Tang, Haobo [1 ]
Ji, Yulong [1 ]
Han, Fenghui [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Maritime Univ, Marine Engn Coll, Dalian 116026, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Maritime Univ, Natl Ctr Int Res Subsea Engn Technol & Equipment, Dalian 116026, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Turbomachinery, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Ctr Int Res Subsea Engn Technol & Equipment, Dalian 116026, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Rankine Carnot batteries; Ice storage; Waste heat; 4E analyses; System comparison; E power generation (kWh); THERMAL-ENERGY; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; LEVELIZED COST; HEAT; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEM; FLUID;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117485
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Rankine Carnot batteries have demonstrated promise as a viable solution for electricity storage due to their high energy density at low temperatures. A specific variant of these batteries, known as the Cold Storage Rankine Carnot Battery (CSRCB), utilizes a vapor compression refrigeration (VCR) unit to store cold energy at subambient temperatures. In this paper, three different configurations of CSRCB are constructed: the Basic CSRCB (B-CSRCB), CSRCB with a recuperator in VCR (R-CSRCB), and CSRCB with a recuperator in VCR and a preheater in ORC (RP-CSRCB). The system is analyzed from four perspectives: energy, exergy, economic, and environmental (4E). The impact of key parameters, such as heat source temperature, ambient temperature, and pinch point temperature, on the system's performance is evaluated. The results indicate that the RP-CSCBR configuration outperforms others in terms of energy, exergy, and economic analysis. The evaporator in ORC-subsystem is the component with the largest exergy loss. When the three configurations of CSRCB achieve the maximum exergy efficiency under different conditions, the ORC-subsystem evaporator accounts for 41.9 %, 41.9 % and 17.6 % of the exergy loss of B-CSRCB, R-CSRCB and RP-CSRCB, respectively. The lowest levelized cost of storage (LCOS) can be obtained when the system is operating at high heat source temperature, low ambient temperature and small pinch temperature difference. The environment assessment results show that the changes of the key parameters of the system have different effects on the annual emission reduction (AER) and total equivalent warming impact (TEWI) of CSRCB with different configurations.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Energy, exergy, and economic performance analysis of integrated parabolic trough collector with organic rankine cycle and ejector refrigeration cycle
    Ogaili, Hamid Hawi
    Khalilarya, Shahram
    Chitsaz, Ata
    Mojaver, Parisa
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT-X, 2025, 25
  • [22] Exergy, economic and environmental analysis of organic Rankine cycle based vapor compression refrigeration system
    Ashwni
    Sherwani, Ahmad Faizan
    Tiwari, Deepak
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRIGERATION, 2021, 126 : 259 - 271
  • [23] Exergy analysis of cascade Ethylene-Propane Rankine cycle with cold energy recovery of LNG
    Zhu, Hongmei
    Liu, Hongwei
    Sun, Heng
    PROGRESS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2012, 170-173 : 2489 - +
  • [24] Thermo-economic assessment of a salt hydrate thermochemical energy storage-based Rankine Carnot battery system
    Li, Wei
    Zhang, Lianjie
    Deng, Yajun
    Zeng, Min
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 312
  • [25] Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental assessment and performance optimization of dual-stage discharge Carnot battery systems for floating liquefied natural gas
    Wang, Zhe
    Liu, Han
    Jiang, Changhao
    Liu, Sijun
    Ji, Yulong
    Han, Fenghui
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 330
  • [26] A comprehensive overview of refrigerants from the past to the modern day: energy, exergy, and environmental perspectives
    Yildirim, Ragip
    Akyuz, Ali
    Kumas, Kazim
    Tuncer, Azim Dogus
    Gungor, Afsin
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2025,
  • [27] Studying performance, energy, exergy, economic, environmental, and sustainability analyses of solar still using different storage materials
    Handawy, Mohamed Koraiem
    Abdelmotalib, Hamada Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 104
  • [28] Energy, exergy and economic analysis of a hybrid renewable energy with hydrogen storage system
    Khosravi, A.
    Koury, R. N. N.
    Machado, L.
    Pabon, J. J. G.
    ENERGY, 2018, 148 : 1087 - 1102
  • [29] Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental (4E) analysis of a pumped thermal energy storage system for trigeneration in buildings
    Lykas, Panagiotis
    Bellos, Evangelos
    Korres, Dimitrios N.
    Kitsopoulou, Angeliki
    Tzivanidis, Christos
    ENERGY ADVANCES, 2023, 2 (03): : 430 - 440
  • [30] Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of New Photovoltaic/Serpentine Collectors using Response Surface Methodology: Energy, Exergy, and Environmental Perspectives
    Abo-Zahhad, Essam M.
    Hachicha, Ahmed Amine
    Radwan, Ali
    Said, Zafar
    Rahman, S. M. A.
    Haridy, Salah
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2024, 268