Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Zhilan [1 ]
Ma, Chunyan [1 ]
Luo, Yanbing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Haikou Hosp, Xiangya Sch Med, Dept Ultrason Med, Haikou, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Haikou Hosp, Xiangya Sch Med, Dept Ultrason Med, 43 Renmin Ave, Haikou 570208, Peoples R China
关键词
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); hepatocellular carcinoma; early stage; diagnosis; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.21037/jgo-23-211
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and its incidence rate will continue to increase. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is feasible as a rapid examination for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. However, considering the possible causes of false positives caused by ultrasound, its diagnostic value is still controversial. Therefore, the study conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the application value of CEUS in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Information (VIP), and Wanfang databases were searched to retrieve articles on the use of CEUS for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The literature quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) quality assessment tool. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 to fit the likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and corresponding 95% CI, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI). The publication bias of the included literature was evaluated using the DEEK funnel plot.Results: Ultimately, 9 articles, comprising 1,434 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity test found that I2>50%, using a random effects model. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the CEUS had a combined sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95), a combined specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.56-0.99), a combined PLR of 13.47 (95% CI: 1.51-120.46), a combined NLR of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05-0.14), a combined DOR of 154.16 (95% CI: 15.93-1,492.02), a diagnostic score of 5.04 (95% CI: 2.77- 7.31), and a combined AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). The correlation coefficient of the threshold-effect analysis was 0.13 (P>0.05). The results of the regression analysis showed that the country of publication (P=0.14) and the size of the lesion nodules (P=0.46) were not sources of heterogeneity.Conclusions: Liver CEUS has an advantage in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, with high sensitivity and specificity, and has clinical application value.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 635
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jung Hee Son
    Sang Hyun Choi
    So Yeon Kim
    So Jung Lee
    Seong Ho Park
    Kyung Won Kim
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    Pyo-Nyun Kim
    Hepatology International, 2020, 14 : 1104 - 1113
  • [42] CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND FOR THE DIFFERENTIATION OF BENIGN AND MALIGNANT FOCAL LIVER LESIONS: A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Friedrich-Rust, M.
    Klopffleisch, T.
    Nierhoff, J.
    Herrmann, E.
    Schneider, M. D.
    Vermehren, J.
    Zeuzem, S.
    Bojunga, J.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 56 : S278 - S279
  • [43] Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Son, Jung Hee
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, So Jung
    Park, Seong Ho
    Kim, Kyung Won
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Kim, Pyo-Nyun
    HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 14 (06) : 1104 - 1113
  • [44] A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic capability of automated breast ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast cancer
    Zhang, Haoyu
    Hu, Jingyi
    Meng, Rong
    Liu, Fangfang
    Xu, Fan
    Huang, Min
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 13
  • [45] Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Detecting Residual or Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Liu, Hai-Feng
    Zou, Li-Qiu
    Lu, Xing-Ru
    Sheng, Ye
    Wang, Qing
    Ding, Jiu-Le
    Shi, Li
    Liu, Shui-Qing
    Xing, Wei
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (04) : 1019 - 1028
  • [46] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Geng, Jing
    Tang, Jun
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2018, 16 (06) : 5310 - 5314
  • [47] Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound with That of Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography and Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Furrer, Marc A.
    Spycher, Samuel C. J.
    Buettiker, Sophia M.
    Gross, Tobias
    Bosshard, Piet
    Thalmann, George N.
    Schneider, Marc P.
    Roth, Beat
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (04): : 464 - 473
  • [48] Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Splenic Diseases A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Li, Xing-Zhao
    Song, Jun
    Sun, Zhi-Xia
    Yang, Yan-Yan
    Lin, Yuan-Qiang
    Wang, Hui
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (09) : 1687 - 1694
  • [49] Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Testicular Space-Occupying Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yu, Xin
    Zhao, Qiaoyun
    Guo, Liangyun
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (11) : 4509 - 4518
  • [50] Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in traumatic solid organ injuries in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jannatdoust, Payam
    Valizadeh, Parya
    Hassankhani, Amir
    Amoukhteh, Melika
    Ghadimi, Delaram J.
    Heidari-Foroozan, Mahsa
    Sabeghi, Paniz
    Adli, Paniz
    Johnston, Jennifer H.
    Vasavada, Pauravi S.
    Gholamrezanezhad, Ali
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2025, 55 (02) : 226 - 241