Endoscopic biliary treatment of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis of survival outcomes and systematic review

被引:7
|
作者
Rebhun, Jeffrey [1 ,5 ]
Shin, Claire M. [2 ]
Siddiqui, Uzma D. [3 ]
Villa, Edward [4 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Univ Chicago Med, Ctr Endoscop Res & Therapeut, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Northshore Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
[5] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97239 USA
来源
关键词
Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation; Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation; Photodynamic therapy; Cholangiocarcinoma; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY; NONRESECTABLE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; MANAGEMENT; STENTS;
D O I
10.4253/wjge.v15.i3.177
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (ERFA), percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA), and photodynamic therapy (PDT), when used in conjunction with conventional biliary stenting, have demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. AIM To compare pooled survival outcomes, adverse event rates, and mean stent patency for those undergoing these procedures. METHODS A comprehensive literature review of published studies and abstracts from January 2011 to December 2020 was performed comparing survival outcomes in patients undergoing ERFA with stenting, biliary stenting alone, PRFA with stenting, and PDT with stenting for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). RESULTS Data from four studies demonstrated a pooled mean survival favoring ERFA as compared to biliary stenting alone (12.0 +/- 0.9 mo vs 6.8 +/- 0.3 mo, P < 0.001) as well as statistically improved median survival time (13 mo vs 8 mo, P < 0.001). Both ERFA with stenting and PRFA with stenting groups demonstrated statistical superiority to biliary stenting alone (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). However, when comparing ERFA to PRFA, pooled data demonstrated overall higher mean survival in the ERFA with stenting cohort as compared to PRFA with stent cohort (12.0 + 0.9 mo vs 8.1 + 2.1 mo, P < 0.0001). Data from two studies demonstrated a pooled median survival favoring ERFA with stenting as compared to PDT with stenting (11.3 mo vs 8.5 mo, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION While further prospective, randomized studies are needed to assess efficacy of ERFA, our meta-analysis demonstrated that this technique offers endoscopists a reasonable palliative method by which to treat patients with unresectable CCA that results in longer survival as compared to biliary stenting alone, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with biliary stenting, and PDT with biliary stenting as well as an acceptable adverse event profile based on available published data.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 190
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Percutaneous vs. endoscopic pre-operative biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hameed, Ahmer
    Pang, Tony
    Chiou, Judy
    Pleass, Henry
    Lam, Vincent
    HoIlands, Michael
    Johnston, Emma
    Richardson, Arthur
    Yuen, Lawrence
    HPB, 2016, 18 (05) : 400 - 410
  • [32] Nivolumab monotherapy and associations in the treatment of advanced unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC): A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Filogonio, Victor
    Maia, Yara Rafaela
    Maia, Lucas Henrique
    Beck, Mauren Carbonar
    Beck, Theodoro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [33] Photodynamic therapy combined with systemic chemotherapy for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Yang
    Wang, Na
    Wang, Yingying
    Shi, Qianling
    Yu, Rong
    Gu, Baohong
    Maswikiti, Ewetse Paul
    Chen, Hao
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2023, 41
  • [34] Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump Chemotherapy for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jessica J. Holster
    Marouan El Hassnaoui
    Stijn Franssen
    Jan N. M. IJzermans
    Jeroen de Jonge
    Bianca Mostert
    Wojciech G. Polak
    Roeland F. de Wilde
    Marjolein Y. V. Homs
    Bas Groot Koerkamp
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 5528 - 5538
  • [35] Transarterial Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Schartz, Derrek A.
    Porter, Marc
    Schartz, Emily
    Kallas, Jeffrey
    Gupta, Akshya
    Butani, Devang
    Cantos, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (06) : 679 - 686
  • [36] Liver Transplantation for Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival Rates
    Ziogas, I. A.
    Economopoulos, K. P.
    Hayat, M. H.
    Matsuoka, L. K.
    Montenovo, M. I.
    Izzy, M.
    Alexopoulos, S. P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 : 493 - 493
  • [37] Thermal ablation in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gun Ha Kim
    Pyeong Hwa Kim
    Jin Hyoung Kim
    Pyo-Nyun Kim
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    Sang Hyun Choi
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 1205 - 1215
  • [38] A systematic review and meta-analysis of caudate lobectomy for treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Birgin, Emrullah
    Rasbach, Erik
    Reissfelder, Christoph
    Rahbari, Nuh N.
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (05): : 747 - 753
  • [39] Thermal ablation in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Gun Ha
    Kim, Pyeong Hwa
    Kim, Jin Hyoung
    Kim, Pyo-Nyun
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (02) : 1205 - 1215
  • [40] Treatment and Prognosis for Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mavros, Michael N.
    Economopoulos, Konstantinos P.
    Alexiou, Vangelis G.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (06) : 565 - 574