Endoscopic biliary treatment of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis of survival outcomes and systematic review

被引:7
|
作者
Rebhun, Jeffrey [1 ,5 ]
Shin, Claire M. [2 ]
Siddiqui, Uzma D. [3 ]
Villa, Edward [4 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Univ Chicago Med, Ctr Endoscop Res & Therapeut, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Northshore Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
[5] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97239 USA
来源
关键词
Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation; Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation; Photodynamic therapy; Cholangiocarcinoma; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY; NONRESECTABLE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; MANAGEMENT; STENTS;
D O I
10.4253/wjge.v15.i3.177
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (ERFA), percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA), and photodynamic therapy (PDT), when used in conjunction with conventional biliary stenting, have demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. AIM To compare pooled survival outcomes, adverse event rates, and mean stent patency for those undergoing these procedures. METHODS A comprehensive literature review of published studies and abstracts from January 2011 to December 2020 was performed comparing survival outcomes in patients undergoing ERFA with stenting, biliary stenting alone, PRFA with stenting, and PDT with stenting for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). RESULTS Data from four studies demonstrated a pooled mean survival favoring ERFA as compared to biliary stenting alone (12.0 +/- 0.9 mo vs 6.8 +/- 0.3 mo, P < 0.001) as well as statistically improved median survival time (13 mo vs 8 mo, P < 0.001). Both ERFA with stenting and PRFA with stenting groups demonstrated statistical superiority to biliary stenting alone (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). However, when comparing ERFA to PRFA, pooled data demonstrated overall higher mean survival in the ERFA with stenting cohort as compared to PRFA with stent cohort (12.0 + 0.9 mo vs 8.1 + 2.1 mo, P < 0.0001). Data from two studies demonstrated a pooled median survival favoring ERFA with stenting as compared to PDT with stenting (11.3 mo vs 8.5 mo, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION While further prospective, randomized studies are needed to assess efficacy of ERFA, our meta-analysis demonstrated that this technique offers endoscopists a reasonable palliative method by which to treat patients with unresectable CCA that results in longer survival as compared to biliary stenting alone, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with biliary stenting, and PDT with biliary stenting as well as an acceptable adverse event profile based on available published data.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 190
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endoscopic management of biliary leaks: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Vlaemynck, Kenny
    Lahousse, Lies
    Vanlander, Aude
    Piessevaux, Hubert
    Hindryckx, Pieter
    ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 51 (11) : 1074 - 1081
  • [22] Survival benefit of conversion surgery for initially unresectable biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhou, Yanming
    Wang, Qingxiang
    Lin, Mingjing
    Wang, Shijie
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2025, 410 (01)
  • [23] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND PROPORTIONAL META-ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL FOLLOWING NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION AND LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IN UNRESECTABLE HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA
    Cambridge, W. A.
    Guest, R. V.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [24] BILATERAL VERSUS UNILATERAL ENDOSCOPIC STENTING FOR UNRESECTABLE MALIGNANT HILAR BILIARY OBSTRUCTION - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Ghazaleh, Sami
    Beran, Azizullah
    Abuhelwa, Ziad
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Elzanaty, Ahmed M.
    Sharma, Sachit
    Nawras, Ali
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (06) : AB123 - AB123
  • [25] Endoscopic Biliary Drainage Versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Patients with Resectable Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Jun-guo
    Wu, Jing
    Wang, Jun
    Shu, Gui-ming
    Wang, Yi-jun
    Lou, Cheng
    Zhang, Jinjuan
    Du, Zhi
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (09): : 1053 - 1060
  • [27] Complications Associated With Photodynamic Therapy in Palliation of Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Moole, Harsha
    Boddireddy, Raghuveer R.
    Moole, Vishnu
    Yerasi, Charan
    Dharmapuri, Sowmya
    Uppu, Achuta
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S1132 - S1132
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation in unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Scrofani, Anna Rita
    Valvano, Marco
    Lancellotta, Valentina
    Pezzulla, Donato
    Vinci, Antonio
    Cornacchione, Patrizia
    Bonome, Paolo
    Tagliaferri, Luca
    Iezzi, Roberto
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [29] Locoregional plus systemic therapy for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qiu, Zhenkang
    Zhang, Mengqi
    Qiu, Wensheng
    Wang, Song
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (16)
  • [30] Endoscopic treatment of benign biliary stricture using different stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fan, Zun
    Zhao, Xin
    Ji, Renting
    Li, Jiacheng
    Shi, Yang
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2022, 17 (01) : 35 - 60