An ideal interval method of multi-objective decision-making for comprehensive assessment of water resources renewability

被引:1
|
作者
YANG Xiaohua1
2. School of Environment
3. Water Resources and Hydropower Planning and Design General Institute
机构
关键词
water resources renewability; comprehensive assessment; multiple objective decision-making; ideal interval; Yellow River basin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TV211 [水利调查];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
In order to estimate water resources renewability scientifically, an Ideal Interval Method of Multiple Objective Decision-Making (IIMMODM) is presented. This method is developed through improving an ideal point method of multiple objective decision-making. The ideal interval is obtained with assessment standard instead of ideal points. The weights are decided by using the basic point and gray code accelerating genetic algorithm. This method has synthesized the expert’s suggestion and avoided giving a mark for the objective again. It could solve the complicated problem of compatible or incompatible multi-objective assessment. The principle of IIMMODM is presented in this paper. It is used to assess the water resources renewability for nine administrative divisions in the Yellow River basin. The result shows that the water resources renewability in the Yellow River basin is very low. Compared with the gray associate analysis method, fuzzy synthesis method and genetic projection pursuit method, the IIMMODM is easier to use. Compared with the ideal point method of multiple objective decision-making, the IIMMODM has good robustness, which is applicable to the comprehensive assessments of water resources.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 50
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-Objective Decision-Making for an Island Microgrid in the Gulf of Maine
    Ghasemi, Roozbeh
    Wosnik, Martin
    Foster, Diane L.
    Mo, Weiwei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [42] Multi-objective decision-making of materials selection in green design
    School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
    Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao, 2006, 8 (131-136):
  • [43] A multi-objective model for computer-mediated decision-making
    Wang, J
    Li, Y
    Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Public Administration, 2005, : 712 - 718
  • [44] A MULTI-OBJECTIVE ROUTING DECISION-MAKING MODEL FOR OPPORTUNISTIC NETWORK
    Chen, Meng
    Wang, Haiquan
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2011, : 316 - 320
  • [45] MULTI-OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING IN WASTE-DISPOSAL PLANNING
    PERLACK, RD
    WILLIS, CE
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1985, 111 (03): : 373 - 385
  • [46] A multi-objective decision-making approach to the journal submission problem
    Wong, Tony E.
    Srikrishnan, Vivek
    Hadka, David
    Keller, Klaus
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [47] Multi-Objective Decision-Making for Mobile Cloud Offloading: A Survey
    Wu, Huaming
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 3962 - 3976
  • [48] Multi-objective Coevolution and Decision-making for Cooperative and Competitive Environments
    Suresh, Anirudh
    Kongmanee, Jaturong
    Deb, Kalyanmoy
    Boddeti, Vishnu Naresh
    2021 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC 2021), 2021, : 1601 - 1608
  • [49] The research of decision-making method for multi-objective in water bloom emergency governance based on vague set theory
    Bai, Yuting
    Wang, Xiaoyi
    Wang, Li
    Xu, Jiping
    Yu, Jiabin
    Shi, Yan
    Journal of Computational Information Systems, 2014, 10 (05): : 2099 - 2106
  • [50] Application of Improved SAW in the Multi-objective Decision-making Process
    Zhang Hengquan
    Lin Bin
    SYSTEMS, ORGANIZATIONS AND MANAGEMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD WORKSHOP OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY IN SCIENTIFIC INVENTIONS, 2009, : 212 - 216