Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin

被引:0
|
作者
Lin Wang [1 ]
Guo-Li Gu [2 ]
Zhong-Wu Li [3 ]
Yi-Fan Peng [1 ]
Jin Gu [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Colorectal Surgery,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
[2] Department of General Surgery,Air Force General Hospital
[3] Department of Pathology,Department of Gastroenterology,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
关键词
Abdominoperineal excision; Preoperative radiotherapy; Circumferential resection margin; Survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.37 [];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AIM: To evaluate whether an abdominoperineal excision(APE) is associated with increased local recurrence(LR) and shortened disease-free survival(DFS) in mid-low rectal cancer with a negative circumferential resection margin(CRM).METHODS: 283 consecutive cases of mid-low rectal cancer underwent preoperative 30 Gy/10 F radiotherapy and surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital between August 2003 and August 2009. Patients with positive CRM and intraoperative distant metastasis were precluded according to exclusion criteria. Survival analyses were performed in patients with APE or non-APE procedures.RESULTS: 256 of the 283(90.5%) cases were enrolled in the analysis, including 78(30.5%) and 178(69.5%) cases who received APE and non-APE procedures. Fewer female patients(P = 0.016), lower level of tumor(P = 0.000) and higher body mass index(P = 0.006) were found in the APE group. On univariate analysis, the APE group had a higher LR rate(5.1% vs 1.1%, P = 0.036) and decreased DFS(73.1% vs 83.4%, P = 0.021). On multivariate analysis, APE procedure was also an independent risk factor for LR(HR = 5.960, 1.085-32.728, P = 0.040) and decreased DFS(HR = 2.304, 1.298-4.092, P = 0.004). In stratified analysis for lower rectal cancer, APE procedure was still an independent risk factor for higher LR rate(5.6% vs 0%, P = 0.024) and shortened DFS(91.5% vs 73.6%, P = 0.002).CONCLUSION: Following preoperative 30 Gy/10 F radiotherapy, APE procedure was still a predictor for LR and decreased DFS even with negative CRM. More intensive preoperative treatment should be planned for the candidates who are scheduled to receive APE with optimal imaging assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:9138 / 9145
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IMPLICATION OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN IN INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION OF LOW RECTAL CANCER
    Choi, G.
    Kim, H.
    Park, J.
    Park, S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (05) : E268 - E268
  • [32] Risk Factors for Positive Circumferential Resection Margin after Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
    de Lacy, Francisco B.
    Guzman, Yoelimar
    Pena, Romina
    van Laarhoven, Jacqueline
    Otero Pineiro, Ana M.
    Bravo, Raquel
    Lacy, Antonio M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2019, 229 (04) : S71 - S71
  • [33] FACTORS INFLUENCING CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN IN RECTAL CANCER.
    Hiranyakas, A.
    Ho, Y.
    Wexner, S.
    daSilva, G.
    Sands, D.
    Berho, M.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (05) : E156 - E157
  • [34] Patterns of failure in rectal cancer with positive circumferential resection margin
    Kim, Y.
    Kim, D. Y.
    Kim, T. H.
    Kim, S. Y.
    Baek, J. Y.
    Kim, M. J.
    Chang, H. J.
    Kim, M. J.
    Park, S. C.
    Oh, J. H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S810 - S811
  • [35] Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer and Circumferential Margin: Is It Time to Move on?
    Shukla, Parul J.
    Pavoor, Raghava S.
    La Gratta, Maria
    Milsom, Jeffrey W.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (08) : 1049 - 1052
  • [36] Application of modified extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer resection
    Zhang, Xiang
    Li, Xin
    Qin, Qingdi
    Wang, Yanlei
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (10): : 6177 - 6183
  • [37] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Watanabe, Tatsuki
    Sasaki, Kazuhito
    Nozawa, Hiroaki
    Murono, Koji
    Emoto, Shigenobu
    Matsuzaki, Hiroyuki
    Yokoyama, Yuichiro
    Abe, Shinya
    Nagai, Yuzo
    Shinagawa, Takahide
    Sonoda, Hirofumi
    Sukchol, Lim
    Ishihara, Soichiro
    IN VIVO, 2024, 38 (04): : 1834 - 1840
  • [38] Rectal cancer. Improvement of therapy with anterior resection or abdominoperineal excision
    Bruch, HP
    Roblick, UJ
    Schwandner, O
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1999, 124 (05): : 422 - 427
  • [39] LOCAL RECURRENCE FOLLOWING ABDOMINOPERINEAL EXCISION AND ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR RECTAL-CARCINOMA
    AMATO, A
    PESCATORI, M
    BUTTI, A
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1991, 34 (04) : 317 - 322
  • [40] Comparative Quality of Life in Patients Following Abdominoperineal Excision and Low Anterior Resection for Low Rectal Cancer
    How, P.
    Stelzner, S.
    Branagan, G.
    Bundy, K.
    Chandrakumaran, K.
    Heald, R. J.
    Moran, B.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2012, 55 (04) : 400 - 406