Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin

被引:0
|
作者
Lin Wang [1 ]
Guo-Li Gu [2 ]
Zhong-Wu Li [3 ]
Yi-Fan Peng [1 ]
Jin Gu [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Colorectal Surgery,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
[2] Department of General Surgery,Air Force General Hospital
[3] Department of Pathology,Department of Gastroenterology,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
关键词
Abdominoperineal excision; Preoperative radiotherapy; Circumferential resection margin; Survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.37 [];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AIM: To evaluate whether an abdominoperineal excision(APE) is associated with increased local recurrence(LR) and shortened disease-free survival(DFS) in mid-low rectal cancer with a negative circumferential resection margin(CRM).METHODS: 283 consecutive cases of mid-low rectal cancer underwent preoperative 30 Gy/10 F radiotherapy and surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital between August 2003 and August 2009. Patients with positive CRM and intraoperative distant metastasis were precluded according to exclusion criteria. Survival analyses were performed in patients with APE or non-APE procedures.RESULTS: 256 of the 283(90.5%) cases were enrolled in the analysis, including 78(30.5%) and 178(69.5%) cases who received APE and non-APE procedures. Fewer female patients(P = 0.016), lower level of tumor(P = 0.000) and higher body mass index(P = 0.006) were found in the APE group. On univariate analysis, the APE group had a higher LR rate(5.1% vs 1.1%, P = 0.036) and decreased DFS(73.1% vs 83.4%, P = 0.021). On multivariate analysis, APE procedure was also an independent risk factor for LR(HR = 5.960, 1.085-32.728, P = 0.040) and decreased DFS(HR = 2.304, 1.298-4.092, P = 0.004). In stratified analysis for lower rectal cancer, APE procedure was still an independent risk factor for higher LR rate(5.6% vs 0%, P = 0.024) and shortened DFS(91.5% vs 73.6%, P = 0.002).CONCLUSION: Following preoperative 30 Gy/10 F radiotherapy, APE procedure was still a predictor for LR and decreased DFS even with negative CRM. More intensive preoperative treatment should be planned for the candidates who are scheduled to receive APE with optimal imaging assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:9138 / 9145
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Investigation of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer surgery
    Dardanov, D.
    Betova, T.
    Deliyski, T.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2007, 12 (03): : 369 - 376
  • [22] Circumferential resection margin assessment on MRI of rectal cancer
    Petroudi, Styliani
    Brown, Gina
    Bond, Sarah
    Brady, Michael
    2006 28TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-15, 2006, : 3851 - +
  • [23] Reporting of Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Manisundaram, Naveen
    Dibrito, Sandra R.
    Hu, Chung-Yuan
    Kim, Youngwan
    Wick, Elizabeth
    Palis, Bryan
    Peacock, Oliver
    Chang, George J.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2023, 158 (11) : 1195 - 1202
  • [24] Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer
    Bernstein, T. E.
    Endreseth, B. H.
    Romundstad, P.
    Wibe, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (11) : 1348 - 1357
  • [25] The prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    Wibe, A
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 120 (05) : A473 - A473
  • [26] A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer
    Simillis, Constantinos
    Baird, Daniel L. H.
    Kontovounisios, Christos
    Pawa, Nikhil
    Brown, Gina
    Rasheed, Shahnawaz
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (02) : 291 - 299
  • [27] Factors influencing circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    Hiranyakas, A.
    da Silva, G.
    Wexner, S. D.
    Ho, Y. -H.
    Allende, D.
    Berho, M.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (03) : 298 - 303
  • [28] Does preoperative magnetic resonance imaging reduce positive circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer?
    Sabbagh, R
    Shah, PR
    Foster, ME
    Woodward, A
    Hicks, E
    Rhys, R
    Shannon, JL
    Champ, C
    Stock, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 : 138 - 139
  • [29] Prone extralevator abdominoperineal excision and reduced circumferential resection margin-'making room with a view'
    Marshall, M.
    Smart, N.
    Daniels, I.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 : 103 - 104
  • [30] Clinical implication of negative conversion of predicted circumferential resection margin status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Lee, Nam Kwon
    Kim, Chul Yong
    Park, Young Je
    Yang, Dae Sik
    Yoon, Won Sup
    Kim, Seon Hahn
    Kim, Jin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (02) : 245 - 249