Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin

被引:0
|
作者
Lin Wang [1 ]
Guo-Li Gu [2 ]
Zhong-Wu Li [3 ]
Yi-Fan Peng [1 ]
Jin Gu [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Colorectal Surgery,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
[2] Department of General Surgery,Air Force General Hospital
[3] Department of Pathology,Department of Gastroenterology,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
关键词
Abdominoperineal excision; Preoperative radiotherapy; Circumferential resection margin; Survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.37 [];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AIM: To evaluate whether an abdominoperineal excision(APE) is associated with increased local recurrence(LR) and shortened disease-free survival(DFS) in mid-low rectal cancer with a negative circumferential resection margin(CRM).METHODS: 283 consecutive cases of mid-low rectal cancer underwent preoperative 30 Gy/10 F radiotherapy and surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital between August 2003 and August 2009. Patients with positive CRM and intraoperative distant metastasis were precluded according to exclusion criteria. Survival analyses were performed in patients with APE or non-APE procedures.RESULTS: 256 of the 283(90.5%) cases were enrolled in the analysis, including 78(30.5%) and 178(69.5%) cases who received APE and non-APE procedures. Fewer female patients(P = 0.016), lower level of tumor(P = 0.000) and higher body mass index(P = 0.006) were found in the APE group. On univariate analysis, the APE group had a higher LR rate(5.1% vs 1.1%, P = 0.036) and decreased DFS(73.1% vs 83.4%, P = 0.021). On multivariate analysis, APE procedure was also an independent risk factor for LR(HR = 5.960, 1.085-32.728, P = 0.040) and decreased DFS(HR = 2.304, 1.298-4.092, P = 0.004). In stratified analysis for lower rectal cancer, APE procedure was still an independent risk factor for higher LR rate(5.6% vs 0%, P = 0.024) and shortened DFS(91.5% vs 73.6%, P = 0.002).CONCLUSION: Following preoperative 30 Gy/10 F radiotherapy, APE procedure was still a predictor for LR and decreased DFS even with negative CRM. More intensive preoperative treatment should be planned for the candidates who are scheduled to receive APE with optimal imaging assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:9138 / 9145
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin
    Wang, Lin
    Gu, Guo-Li
    Li, Zhong-Wu
    Peng, Yi-Fan
    Gu, Jin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (27) : 9138 - 9145
  • [2] Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
    Raftopoulos, I.
    Reed, J. F., III
    Bergamaschi, R.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (04) : 431 - 437
  • [3] SITE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN STANDARD VERSUS EXTRALEVATOR ABDOMINOPERINEAL EXCISION OF RECTAL CANCER.
    Patel, A.
    Bowley, D.
    Geh, I.
    Hendrickse, C.
    McArthur, D.
    Budhoo, M.
    Langman, G.
    Karandikar, S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (04) : E267 - E268
  • [4] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer
    Baik, SH
    Kim, NK
    Lee, KY
    Sohn, SK
    Cho, CH
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (03) : 660 - 660
  • [5] Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Wibe, A
    Rendedal, PR
    Svensson, E
    Norstein, J
    Eide, TJ
    Myrvold, HE
    Soreide, O
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (03) : 327 - 334
  • [6] Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision
    Tilney, Henry S.
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    Sains, Parvinder S.
    Constantinides, Vasilis A.
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [7] Prognostic Impact of Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Mi Ri Hwang
    Ji Won Park
    Sohee Park
    Hyekyoung Yoon
    Dae Yong Kim
    Hee Jin Chang
    Sun Young Kim
    Sung Chan Park
    Hyo Seong Choi
    Jae Hwan Oh
    Seung-Yong Jeong
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 21 : 1345 - 1351
  • [8] Prognostic Impact of Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Hwang, Mi Ri
    Park, Ji Won
    Park, Sohee
    Yoon, Hyekyoung
    Kim, Dae Yong
    Chang, Hee Jin
    Kim, Sun Young
    Park, Sung Chan
    Choi, Hyo Seong
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 1345 - 1351
  • [9] Mesorectal Fascia Instead of Circumferential Resection Margin in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer
    Glimelius, Bengt
    Beets-Tan, Regina
    Blomqvist, Lennart
    Brown, Gina
    Nagtegaal, Iris
    Pahlman, Lars
    Quirke, Phil
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    van de Velde, Cornelis
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (16) : 2142 - 2143
  • [10] Effect of the circumferential resection margin on survival following rectal cancer surgery
    Kelly, S. B.
    Mills, S. J.
    Bradburn, D. M.
    Ratcliffe, A. A.
    Borowski, D. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (04) : 573 - 581