Developing a toolkit to support parents' involvement in child death review: an experience-based co-design study

被引:1
|
作者
Garstang, Joanna Jane [1 ,2 ]
Spry, Jenna [3 ,4 ]
Routledge, Gayle [5 ]
Pease, Anna [6 ]
Shaw, Karen L. [7 ]
Kenyon, Sara [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, England
[2] Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Children & Families Div, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, England
[5] Child Mine, Stafford, England
[6] Univ Bristol, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, England
[7] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, England
[8] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, England
关键词
Mortality; Palliative Care; Health services research; Paediatrics; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1136/archdischild-2024-327642
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background Understanding why children die is important for grieving parents and for informing system improvements aimed at prevention and future care. Many countries have child death review (CDR) process, but little is known about how best to engage parents. The aim of this study was to use experience-based co-design to create a toolkit to support parental involvement in CDR.Methods A survey of English paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and palliative care services explored practices and identified a diverse sample of sites for professional interviews. Bereaved parents were recruited through charities, hospitals and social media. Semistructured interviews were held with parents and professionals followed by co-design workshops to develop the toolkit.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Conclusions Co-design has successfully supported the development of a toolkit of resources in a sensitive area. It required considerable support from bereavement support organisations and researchers. Future evaluation is required.Trial registration number ISRCTN14790455.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patients, informal caregivers and healthcare professionals experience in adoptive cell therapies: An experience-based co-design study (EBCD-ACT)
    Canova, N.
    Graber, N.
    Corbiere, T.
    Bosisio, F.
    Kaufmann, A.
    Bryant-Lukosius, D.
    Eicher, M.
    Colomer-Lahiguera, S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S1242 - S1242
  • [42] USING EXPERIENCE-BASED CO-DESIGN TO EXPLORE VIRTUAL CONSULTATIONS FOR PEOPLE WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES, THEIR FAMILIES AND CLINICIANS: A UK STUDY
    Mold, F.
    Parsons, T.
    Cox, A.
    Shanahan, P.
    Tsianakas, V.
    van Marwijk, H.
    Armes, P. J.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (07) : 835 - 836
  • [43] Improving patient and carer access to information and support through head and neck cancer treatment and survivorship using experience-based co-design
    Hiatt, Joanne
    Young, Adrienne
    Brown, Teresa
    Banks, Merrilyn
    Bauer, Judith
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2023, 36 (02) : 443 - 452
  • [44] Using experience-based co-design to prioritise areas for improvement for patients recovering from critical illness
    Twamley, Jacqueline
    Monks, Rob
    Beaver, Kinta
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2023, 76
  • [45] Utilizing experience-based co-design to improve the experience of patients accessing emergency departments in New South Wales public hospitals: an evaluation study
    Piper, Donella
    Iedema, Rick
    Gray, Jane
    Verma, Raj
    Holmes, Lee
    Manning, Nicole
    HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2012, 25 (04) : 162 - 172
  • [46] Designing a Library of Lived Experience for Mental Health: integrated realist synthesis and experience-based co-design study in UK mental health services
    Marshall, Paul
    Barbrook, John
    Collins, Grace
    Foster, Sheena
    Glossop, Zoe
    Inkster, Clare
    Jebb, Paul
    Johnston, Rose
    Jones, Steven H.
    Khan, Hameed
    Lodge, Christopher
    Machin, Karen
    Michalak, Erin
    Powell, Sarah
    Russell, Samantha
    Rycroft-Malone, Jo
    Slade, Mike
    Whittaker, Lesley
    Lobban, Fiona
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [47] Co-designing a Physical Activity Service for Refugees and Asylum Seekers Using an Experience-Based Co-design Framework
    Mckeon, Grace
    Curtis, Jackie
    Rostami, Reza
    Sroba, Monika
    Farello, Anna
    Morell, Rachel
    Steel, Zachary
    Harris, Mark
    Silove, Derrick
    Parmenter, Belinda
    Matthews, Evan
    Jamaluddin, Juliana
    Rosenbaum, Simon
    JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH, 2024, 26 (04) : 674 - 688
  • [48] Enablers and Barriers to an Experience-Based Co-Design Process to Develop Service Improvements in Enhanced Community Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study
    O'Donoghue, Fay
    O'Donnell, Maire T.
    Griffin, Tomas P.
    Fahy, Eileen
    Newell, Elaine
    Creaven, Ann-Marie
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2025, 28 (02)
  • [49] COCCOS study: Developing a transition program for adolescents with chronic conditions using Experience-Based Co-Design. A study protocol
    Janssens, Natwarin
    Van Wilder, Lisa
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Van Hoorenbeeck, Kim
    Wyngaert, Karsten Vanden
    De Smedt, Delphine
    Goossens, Eva
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (04):
  • [50] AFTER VISIT SUMMARY: AN EXPERIENCE-BASED CO-DESIGN APPROACH TO IMPROVING THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE RELATED TO DISCHARGE INSTRUCTIONS IN THE PERIOPERATIVE SETTING
    Thompson, Sunilka
    Sigueza, Anna Lee
    Juliano, Megan
    Ronning, Kaitlin
    Oberholtzer, Ryan
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2024, 39 (04) : E2 - E2