Developing a toolkit to support parents' involvement in child death review: an experience-based co-design study

被引:1
|
作者
Garstang, Joanna Jane [1 ,2 ]
Spry, Jenna [3 ,4 ]
Routledge, Gayle [5 ]
Pease, Anna [6 ]
Shaw, Karen L. [7 ]
Kenyon, Sara [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, England
[2] Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Children & Families Div, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, England
[5] Child Mine, Stafford, England
[6] Univ Bristol, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, England
[7] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, England
[8] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, England
关键词
Mortality; Palliative Care; Health services research; Paediatrics; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1136/archdischild-2024-327642
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background Understanding why children die is important for grieving parents and for informing system improvements aimed at prevention and future care. Many countries have child death review (CDR) process, but little is known about how best to engage parents. The aim of this study was to use experience-based co-design to create a toolkit to support parental involvement in CDR.Methods A survey of English paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and palliative care services explored practices and identified a diverse sample of sites for professional interviews. Bereaved parents were recruited through charities, hospitals and social media. Semistructured interviews were held with parents and professionals followed by co-design workshops to develop the toolkit.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Conclusions Co-design has successfully supported the development of a toolkit of resources in a sensitive area. It required considerable support from bereavement support organisations and researchers. Future evaluation is required.Trial registration number ISRCTN14790455.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improving the care pathway for women who request Caesarean section: an experience-based co-design study
    Sara L. Kenyon
    Nina Johns
    Sandhya Duggal
    Ruth Hewston
    Nicola Gale
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16
  • [22] Adopting a collaborative approach in developing a prehabilitation program for patients with prostate cancer utilising experience-based co-design methodology
    Clarice Y. Tang
    Monica Turczyniak
    Alesha Sayner
    Kimberley Haines
    Sally Butzkueven
    Helen E. O’Connell
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020, 28 : 5195 - 5202
  • [23] Adopting a collaborative approach in developing a prehabilitation program for patients with prostate cancer utilising experience-based co-design methodology
    Tang, Clarice Y.
    Turczyniak, Monica
    Sayner, Alesha
    Haines, Kimberley
    Butzkueven, Sally
    O'Connell, Helen E.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (11) : 5195 - 5202
  • [24] Using Experience-based co-design (EBCD) to improve breast and lung cancer services
    Tsianakas, V.
    Maben, J.
    Wiseman, T.
    Robert, G.
    Richardson, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 20 : 63 - 63
  • [25] Mobilizing exercise recommendations for people with bone metastases: An experience-based co-design approach
    Nadler, Michelle B.
    Bland, Kelcey
    Neil-Sztramko, Sarah
    Langelier, David
    Lane, Kirstin N.
    Chalmers, Alana
    Dinardo, Rhonda
    Alibhai, Shabbir M. H.
    Capozzi, Lauren
    McDonald, Karen
    Copp, Jane
    Mackenzie, Kelly
    McNeely, Margaret
    Lambert, Leah
    Bates, Alan
    Simmons, Christine E.
    Campbell, Kristin L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [26] COGNITIVE TRAINING FOR OLDER CHINESE IMMIGRANTS IN THE US: AN EXPERIENCE-BASED CO-DESIGN APPROACH
    Xu, Hanzhang
    McConnell, Eleanor
    Myers, John
    Wu, Bei
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2022, 6 : 18 - 19
  • [27] Why bothering? Experience-based co-design makes 1+1=3
    Den Hartog, P.
    Van der Klooste, J.
    Vasmel, W. L. E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S390 - S390
  • [28] Processes in an Experience-Based Co-Design Project With Family Carers in Community Mental Health
    Chisholm, Laura
    Holttum, Sue
    Springham, Neil
    SAGE OPEN, 2018, 8 (04):
  • [29] ALTERNATIVE PULMONARY REHABILITATION (PR) FOR PEOPLE WITH INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE (ILD): DEVELOPING THE MODEL USING EXPERIENCE-BASED CO-DESIGN
    Brighton, L. J.
    Spain, N.
    Gonzalez-Nieto, J.
    Ingram, K.
    Nolan, C. M.
    THORAX, 2023, 78 (SUPPL_4) : A42 - A42
  • [30] Adapting a Dutch Web-Based Intervention to Support FamilyCaregivers of People With Dementia in the UK Context:Accelerated Experience-Based Co-Design
    Scheibl, Fiona
    Boots, Lizzy
    Eley, Ruth
    Fox, Christopher
    Gracey, Fergus
    Dening, Karen Harrison
    Oyebode, Jan
    Penhale, Bridget
    Poland, Fiona
    Ridel, Gemma
    West, Juniper
    Cross, Jane L.
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2024, 8