A Care Bundle Aiming to Reduce the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Survey of Women's Experiences

被引:1
|
作者
Jurczuk, Magdalena [1 ]
Phillips, Lizzie [2 ]
Bidwell, Posy [3 ]
Martinez, Dorian [1 ]
Silverton, Louise [4 ]
Sevdalis, Nick [5 ]
van Der Meulen, Jan [6 ]
Gurol-Urganci, Ipek [1 ,6 ]
Thakar, Ranee [7 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, Ctr Qual Improvement & Clin Audit, London, England
[2] Univ Hosp Plymouth NHS Trust, Matern Serv, Plymouth, Devon, England
[3] South Warwickshire Fdn Trust, Warwick, England
[4] Royal Coll Midwives, London, England
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Ctr Behav & Implementat Sci Intervent, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[6] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, London, England
[7] Croydon Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Obstet & Gynaecol, Croydon, England
关键词
childbirth experience; decision-making; intrapartum care; obstetric anal sphincter injury; perineal tear; women's views; MATERNAL RECALL; BIRTH; WALES;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.18029
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To study experiences of women who gave birth in maternity units that have implemented a 'care bundle' quality improvement initiative to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and associated morbidity. Design: Postnatal electronic questionnaire. Setting: Twenty-nine maternity units across England, Scotland and Wales. Population: Women with live vaginal births. Methods: Descriptive statistics for quantitative results. Analysis of free-text responses informed by framework method. Main Outcome Measures: Experience with components of the care bundle: information provision, manual perineal protection (MPP) and post-birth rectal examination. Results: In this study, 1208 women completed the survey: 684 (56.6%) said they received antenatal information about perineal health, 377 (31.2%) recalled MPP, and 664 (55.0%) recalled rectal examination. Of the 684 women who said they received antenatal information, 595 (87.0%) agreed that the information was easy to understand, and 423 (61.8%) agreed that it helped them to make their own choices to reduce their OASI risk. One hundred and fifty-four (22.5%) agreed that the information made them fearful about giving birth vaginally. Of the 377 women who recalled MPP, 203 (53.9%) felt it provided them with support, and another 97 (25.7%) did not mind the sensation. Of the 664 women who recalled rectal examination, 281 (42.3%) did not mind the exam, and another 335 (50.5%) felt it was uncomfortable but understood its importance. Free-text responses aligned with quantitative results. Conclusions: Many women did not recall MPP or rectal examination. The reported experiences for those who recalled these components do not support concerns that the OASI care bundle has negative effects on women's experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 595
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of a quality improvement project to reduce the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a multicentre study with a stepped-wedge design OASI care bundle
    Scamell, Mandie
    Thornton, Jim
    Hales, Katherine
    Renfew, Mary
    Dahlen, Hannah
    Jowit, Margret
    Downe, Soo
    Gillman, Lindsay
    Grace, Nicky
    Wiseman, Octavia
    Forman, Jane
    Grace, Nicky
    Davis, Deborah
    Madeley, Anna-Marie
    Chippington, Debbie
    Lawther, Lorna
    Burns, Ethel
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 (01) : 174 - 175
  • [42] Wexner score and quality of life in women with obstetric anal sphincter injury
    Jango, Hanna
    Langhoff-Roos, Jens
    Rosthoj, Susanne
    Sakse, Abelone
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (06) : 1115 - 1121
  • [43] WHAT IS THE RISK OF A SECOND OBSTETRIC ANAL SPHINCTER INJURY AFTER A PREVIOUS INJURY?
    Burton, C.
    Webb, S.
    Masood, M.
    Parsons, M.
    Radley, S.
    Toozs-Hobson, P.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 : S228 - S228
  • [44] Recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury and the risk of long-term anal incontinence
    Jango, Hanna
    Langhoff-Roos, Jens
    Rosthoj, Susanne
    Sakse, Abelone
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (06)
  • [45] RECURRENT OBSTETRIC ANAL SPHINCTER INJURY AND THE RISK OF LONG-TERM ANAL INCONTINENCE
    Jango, H.
    Langhoff-Roos, J.
    Rosthoj, S.
    Sakse, A.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2016, 35 : S139 - S140
  • [46] Perineal support and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a Delphi survey
    Ismail, Khaled M. K.
    Paschetta, Elena
    Papoutsis, Dimitrios
    Freeman, Robert M.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2015, 94 (02) : 165 - 174
  • [47] Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury. To prolong or to vacuum?
    Garmi, Gali
    Zafran, Noah
    Zuarez-Easton, Sivan
    Braverman, Meirav
    Nachum, Zohar
    Salim, Raed
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S387 - S387
  • [48] Assessing Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in the United States
    Propst, Katie A.
    Bruckman, David
    Hickman, Lisa C.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 : 65S - 65S
  • [49] Obstetric anal sphincter injury risk factors and the role of the mediolateral episiotomy
    Twidale, Emily
    Cornell, Kristin
    Litzow, Nicholas
    Hotchin, Anne
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 53 (01): : 17 - 20
  • [50] Does pool birth increase the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury?
    Preston, H.
    Drammond, S.
    Lane, S.
    Fowler, G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 : 53 - 54