A Care Bundle Aiming to Reduce the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Survey of Women's Experiences

被引:1
|
作者
Jurczuk, Magdalena [1 ]
Phillips, Lizzie [2 ]
Bidwell, Posy [3 ]
Martinez, Dorian [1 ]
Silverton, Louise [4 ]
Sevdalis, Nick [5 ]
van Der Meulen, Jan [6 ]
Gurol-Urganci, Ipek [1 ,6 ]
Thakar, Ranee [7 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, Ctr Qual Improvement & Clin Audit, London, England
[2] Univ Hosp Plymouth NHS Trust, Matern Serv, Plymouth, Devon, England
[3] South Warwickshire Fdn Trust, Warwick, England
[4] Royal Coll Midwives, London, England
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Ctr Behav & Implementat Sci Intervent, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[6] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, London, England
[7] Croydon Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Obstet & Gynaecol, Croydon, England
关键词
childbirth experience; decision-making; intrapartum care; obstetric anal sphincter injury; perineal tear; women's views; MATERNAL RECALL; BIRTH; WALES;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.18029
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To study experiences of women who gave birth in maternity units that have implemented a 'care bundle' quality improvement initiative to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and associated morbidity. Design: Postnatal electronic questionnaire. Setting: Twenty-nine maternity units across England, Scotland and Wales. Population: Women with live vaginal births. Methods: Descriptive statistics for quantitative results. Analysis of free-text responses informed by framework method. Main Outcome Measures: Experience with components of the care bundle: information provision, manual perineal protection (MPP) and post-birth rectal examination. Results: In this study, 1208 women completed the survey: 684 (56.6%) said they received antenatal information about perineal health, 377 (31.2%) recalled MPP, and 664 (55.0%) recalled rectal examination. Of the 684 women who said they received antenatal information, 595 (87.0%) agreed that the information was easy to understand, and 423 (61.8%) agreed that it helped them to make their own choices to reduce their OASI risk. One hundred and fifty-four (22.5%) agreed that the information made them fearful about giving birth vaginally. Of the 377 women who recalled MPP, 203 (53.9%) felt it provided them with support, and another 97 (25.7%) did not mind the sensation. Of the 664 women who recalled rectal examination, 281 (42.3%) did not mind the exam, and another 335 (50.5%) felt it was uncomfortable but understood its importance. Free-text responses aligned with quantitative results. Conclusions: Many women did not recall MPP or rectal examination. The reported experiences for those who recalled these components do not support concerns that the OASI care bundle has negative effects on women's experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 595
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Birthweight Difference Between Deliveries and the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in Parous Women
    Chill, H.
    Karavani, G.
    Yishai, K.
    Lipschuetz, M.
    Shimonovitz, T.
    Shveiky, D.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S418 - S419
  • [22] The Impact of Smoking on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in Nulliparous Women
    Constable, L.
    Monga, D.
    Mylonas, G.
    O'Connor, E.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 : 26 - 26
  • [23] Women's experience of anal incontinence following a history of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a literature review
    Tucker, Julie
    Wilson, Anne
    Clifton, Vicki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2013, 11 (03): : 181 - 186
  • [24] Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: A prospective study
    Andrews, V
    Sultan, AH
    Thakar, R
    Jones, PW
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2006, 33 (02): : 117 - 122
  • [25] Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury by delivering provider type
    Walker, T. V.
    Sparks, A. D.
    Carter-Brooks, C. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (06) : S762 - S762
  • [26] A Search for Novel Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury
    Rios, Angel R. Gonzalez
    Zighelboim, Israel
    Anasti, James
    Merola, Joseph
    Stoltzfus, Jill
    Lucente, Vincent
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 28 (02): : 104 - 108
  • [27] Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in a Diverse Population
    Woo, Victoria G.
    Hung, Yun-Yi
    Ramm, Olga
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 30S - 30S
  • [28] Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury among adolescents
    Meyer, Raanan
    Levin, Gabriel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 270 : 151 - 155
  • [29] Obstetric anal sphincter injury - Incidence, risk factors, and management
    Dudding, Thomas C.
    Vaizey, Carolynne J.
    Kamm, Michael A.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (02) : 224 - 237
  • [30] Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: To prolong or to vacuum?
    Garmi, Gali
    Peretz, Hadar
    Braverman, Meirav
    Berkovich, Ilanit
    Molnar, Robert
    Salim, Raed
    MIDWIFERY, 2016, 34 : 178 - 182