Comparative analysis of environmental impact and energy consumption in sesame and mung bean production using life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Rostami, Homa [1 ]
Azizpanah, Amir [1 ]
Fathi, Rostam [2 ]
Taki, Morteza [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ilam, Coll Agr, Dept Mech Biosyst, Ilam, Iran
[2] Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ Khuzestan, Fac Agr Engn & Rural Dev, Dept Agr Machinery & Mechanizat Engn, Mollasani, Iran
来源
ENERGY NEXUS | 2025年 / 17卷
关键词
Resource depletion; Energy consumption patterns; Agricultural sustainability; Energy efficiency; USE EFFICIENCY; CUCUMBER; INPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100397
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The study aimed to evaluate energy consumption patterns, environmental impacts, and optimization of energy use in sesame and mung bean productions in Abdanan, Iran. Data were gathered and evaluated using surveys from 41 farmers through questionnaire and face to face interview. The results revealed that for sesame production, the energy ratio was 1.68, energy productivity was 0.067 kg MJ-1 and specific energy was 14.48 MJ kg-1, while for mung bean production, these values were significantly lower at 0.72, 0.049 kg MJ-1 and 2.32 MJ kg-1. In terms of environmental impact, sesame production exhibited fewer emissions across most of the 15 mid-point environmental indicators assessed, with mung bean production resulting in higher emissions related to ecosystem quality, human health, climate change and resource depletion; specifically, the global warming potential for producing one ton of sesame was calculated as 1459.17 kg CO2eq compared to 2237.11 kg CO2eq for mung bean. The primary contributor to climate change was identified as direct emissions from input usage, with reduced diesel fuel consumption in sesame farming significantly mitigating environmental impacts. Efficiency analysis using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) indicated that 65.85 % of mung bean production units were efficient in the Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) model and 34.15 % in the Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) model. For sesame production, these rates were 56.09 % in the VRS and 36.58 % in the CRS model. Average technical efficiency was estimated at 87.89 % for mung bean and 85.83 % for sesame. The study concludes that sesame production is more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly compared to mung bean production, suggesting that farmers should adopt practices that reduce diesel fuel consumption and optimize input usage to enhance sustainability and minimize environmental impacts. Future research could explore alternative farming practices that further improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both crops.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The link between operational efficiency and environmental impacts A joint application of Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis
    Lozano, Sebastian
    Iribarren, Diego
    Teresa Moreira, Maria
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 407 (05) : 1744 - 1754
  • [32] Environmental impact assessment of solar energy systems results from a life cycle analysis
    Gekas, V
    Frantzeskaki, N
    Tsoutsos, T
    PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT VI, VOLS I - III, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 1569 - 1575
  • [33] Evaluation of the Environmental Impact and Energy Utilization Efficiency of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Tumen River Basin Based on a Life Cycle Assessment plus Data Envelopment Analysis Model
    Liu, Jiaxin
    Sun, Bo
    Piao, Wenhua
    Jin, Mingji
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [34] Environmental impact of screenhouse and open-field cultivation using a life cycle analysis: the case study of green bean production
    Romero-Gamez, M.
    Suarez-Rey, E. M.
    Anton, A.
    Castilla, N.
    Soriano, T.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 28 : 63 - 69
  • [35] Assessing between and within Product Group Variance of Environmental Efficiency of Swiss Agriculture Using Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis
    Pedolin, Dario
    Six, Johan
    Nemecek, Thomas
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [36] Energy consumption analysis of wheat production in West Azarbayjan utilizing life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Taghavifar, Hamid
    Mardani, Aref
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 74 : 208 - 213
  • [37] A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Analysis of Liquid Biofuels Production
    Koroneos, Christopher
    Anastasiou, Foteini
    Diatrios, Rovas
    COMPUTING AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUES IN SCIENCES, 2008, : 218 - +
  • [38] Life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis approach for the selection of building components according to their environmental impact efficiency: a case study for external walls
    Iribarren, Diego
    Marvuglia, Antonino
    Hild, Paula
    Guiton, Melanie
    Popovici, Emil
    Benetto, Enrico
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 87 : 707 - 716
  • [39] Comparative environmental assessment of methanol production technologies: A cradle-to-gate life cycle analysis
    Liu, Jing
    Zhao, Jun
    Wei, Haiqiao
    Zhu, Qiang
    Li, Yang
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 302
  • [40] Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for the benchmarking of energy, exergy, environmental effects, and water footprint in the canned apple supply chain
    Hessampour, Reza
    Bastani, Aboubakr
    Hassani, Mehrdad
    Failla, Sabina
    Vaverkova, Magdalena Daria
    Halog, Anthony
    ENERGY, 2023, 278