Comparative analysis of environmental impact and energy consumption in sesame and mung bean production using life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Rostami, Homa [1 ]
Azizpanah, Amir [1 ]
Fathi, Rostam [2 ]
Taki, Morteza [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ilam, Coll Agr, Dept Mech Biosyst, Ilam, Iran
[2] Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ Khuzestan, Fac Agr Engn & Rural Dev, Dept Agr Machinery & Mechanizat Engn, Mollasani, Iran
来源
ENERGY NEXUS | 2025年 / 17卷
关键词
Resource depletion; Energy consumption patterns; Agricultural sustainability; Energy efficiency; USE EFFICIENCY; CUCUMBER; INPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100397
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The study aimed to evaluate energy consumption patterns, environmental impacts, and optimization of energy use in sesame and mung bean productions in Abdanan, Iran. Data were gathered and evaluated using surveys from 41 farmers through questionnaire and face to face interview. The results revealed that for sesame production, the energy ratio was 1.68, energy productivity was 0.067 kg MJ-1 and specific energy was 14.48 MJ kg-1, while for mung bean production, these values were significantly lower at 0.72, 0.049 kg MJ-1 and 2.32 MJ kg-1. In terms of environmental impact, sesame production exhibited fewer emissions across most of the 15 mid-point environmental indicators assessed, with mung bean production resulting in higher emissions related to ecosystem quality, human health, climate change and resource depletion; specifically, the global warming potential for producing one ton of sesame was calculated as 1459.17 kg CO2eq compared to 2237.11 kg CO2eq for mung bean. The primary contributor to climate change was identified as direct emissions from input usage, with reduced diesel fuel consumption in sesame farming significantly mitigating environmental impacts. Efficiency analysis using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) indicated that 65.85 % of mung bean production units were efficient in the Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) model and 34.15 % in the Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) model. For sesame production, these rates were 56.09 % in the VRS and 36.58 % in the CRS model. Average technical efficiency was estimated at 87.89 % for mung bean and 85.83 % for sesame. The study concludes that sesame production is more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly compared to mung bean production, suggesting that farmers should adopt practices that reduce diesel fuel consumption and optimize input usage to enhance sustainability and minimize environmental impacts. Future research could explore alternative farming practices that further improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both crops.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Balance between energy conservation and environmental impact: Life-cycle energy analysis and life-cycle environmental impact analysis
    Hu, Ming
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 140 : 131 - 139
  • [22] Evaluation and Optimization of Energy and Environmental Indicators Using Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis (Case Study: Industrial Cattle Farms in Northern Khuzestan)
    Fathi, R.
    Nejad-Raeini, M. Ghasemi
    Hesampour, R.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY, 2023, 13 (04) : 383 - 404
  • [23] Multi criteria decision making using Data Envelopment Analysis at the example of life cycle analysis for dairy production
    Müller, B
    KIELER MILCHWIRTSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNGSBERICHTE, 2003, 55 (03): : 233 - 253
  • [24] Optimization of energy consumption and input costs for apple production in Iran using data envelopment analysis
    Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Mohammadi, Ali
    ENERGY, 2011, 36 (02) : 909 - 916
  • [25] Optimization of energy consumption for wheat production in iran using data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique
    Bahrami, Houshang
    Taki, Morteza
    Monjezi, Nasim
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2011, 6 (27): : 5978 - 5986
  • [26] Assessing the economic and environmental impact of jasmine rice production: Life cycle assessment and Life Cycle Costs analysis
    Jirapornvaree, Ittisak
    Suppadit, Tawadchai
    Kumar, Vikas
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 303
  • [27] EVALUATING ENERGY CONSUMPTION EFFICIENCY IN TOBACCO PRODUCTION: APPLYING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
    Mushtaq, Zulqarnain
    Wei, Wei
    Sharif, Maimoona
    Ali Chandio, Abbas
    E & M EKONOMIE A MANAGEMENT, 2021, 24 (03): : 23 - 39
  • [28] Further potentials in the joint implementation of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis
    Iribarren, Diego
    Vazquez-Rowe, Ian
    Teresa Moreira, Maria
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 408 (22) : 5265 - 5272
  • [29] Environmental Impact Analysis of Batik Natural Dyes Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Rinawati, Dyah Ika
    Sari, Diana Puspita
    Purwanggono, Bambang
    Hermawan, Andy Tri
    3RD INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS, INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (MIMEC2017), 2017, 1902
  • [30] Environmental Impact Analysis on Residential Building in Malaysia Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Abd Rashid, Ahmad Faiz
    Idris, Juferi
    Yusoff, Sumiani
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (03)