Comparative analysis of environmental impact and energy consumption in sesame and mung bean production using life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Rostami, Homa [1 ]
Azizpanah, Amir [1 ]
Fathi, Rostam [2 ]
Taki, Morteza [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ilam, Coll Agr, Dept Mech Biosyst, Ilam, Iran
[2] Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ Khuzestan, Fac Agr Engn & Rural Dev, Dept Agr Machinery & Mechanizat Engn, Mollasani, Iran
来源
ENERGY NEXUS | 2025年 / 17卷
关键词
Resource depletion; Energy consumption patterns; Agricultural sustainability; Energy efficiency; USE EFFICIENCY; CUCUMBER; INPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100397
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The study aimed to evaluate energy consumption patterns, environmental impacts, and optimization of energy use in sesame and mung bean productions in Abdanan, Iran. Data were gathered and evaluated using surveys from 41 farmers through questionnaire and face to face interview. The results revealed that for sesame production, the energy ratio was 1.68, energy productivity was 0.067 kg MJ-1 and specific energy was 14.48 MJ kg-1, while for mung bean production, these values were significantly lower at 0.72, 0.049 kg MJ-1 and 2.32 MJ kg-1. In terms of environmental impact, sesame production exhibited fewer emissions across most of the 15 mid-point environmental indicators assessed, with mung bean production resulting in higher emissions related to ecosystem quality, human health, climate change and resource depletion; specifically, the global warming potential for producing one ton of sesame was calculated as 1459.17 kg CO2eq compared to 2237.11 kg CO2eq for mung bean. The primary contributor to climate change was identified as direct emissions from input usage, with reduced diesel fuel consumption in sesame farming significantly mitigating environmental impacts. Efficiency analysis using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) indicated that 65.85 % of mung bean production units were efficient in the Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) model and 34.15 % in the Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) model. For sesame production, these rates were 56.09 % in the VRS and 36.58 % in the CRS model. Average technical efficiency was estimated at 87.89 % for mung bean and 85.83 % for sesame. The study concludes that sesame production is more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly compared to mung bean production, suggesting that farmers should adopt practices that reduce diesel fuel consumption and optimize input usage to enhance sustainability and minimize environmental impacts. Future research could explore alternative farming practices that further improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both crops.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimization of energy consumption and environmental impacts of arecanut production through coupled data envelopment analysis and life cycle assessment
    Paramesh, Venkatesh
    Arunachalam, Vadivel
    Nikkhah, Amin
    Das, Bappa
    Ghnimi, Sami
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 203 : 674 - 684
  • [2] Joint data envelopment analysis and life cycle assessment for environmental impact reduction in broiler production systems
    Payandeh, Z.
    Kheiralipour, K.
    Karimi, M.
    Khoshnevisan, B.
    ENERGY, 2017, 127 : 768 - 774
  • [3] Environmental management of tea production using joint of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis approaches
    Kouchaki-Penchah, Hamed
    Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan
    O'Dwyer, Jean
    Sharifi, Mohammad
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2017, 36 (04) : 1116 - 1122
  • [4] Coupled life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for mitigation of environmental impacts and enhancement of energy efficiency in grape production
    Mohseni, Payam
    Borghei, Ali Mohammad
    Khanali, Majid
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 937 - 947
  • [5] Life cycle assessment and environmental impact analysis for green energy production plants
    Gabbar, Hossam A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2007, : 2058 - 2063
  • [6] An integrated approach for the benchmarking of production facilities' environmental performance: data envelopment analysis and life cycle assessment
    Ng, C. Y.
    Chuah, K. B.
    King, Alex Pui-yuk
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING, 2019, 12 (02) : 108 - 114
  • [7] Joint Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis for the benchmarking of environmental impacts in rice paddy production
    Mohammadi, Ali
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Jafari, Ali
    Keyhani, Alireza
    Dalgaard, Tommy
    Knudsen, Marie Trydeman
    Nguyen, Thu Lan T.
    Borek, Robert
    Hermansen, John E.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 106 : 521 - 532
  • [8] Life cycle energy analysis and environmental life cycle assessment of carbon nanofibers production
    Khanna, Vikas
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    Lee, L. James
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS & THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2007, : 128 - +
  • [9] Optimization in energy consumption of carnation production using data envelopment analysis (DEA)
    Zeinab Shabani
    Shahin Rafiee
    Hossein Mobli
    Eisa Khanalipur
    Shabani, Z. (shabanizein@ut.ac.ir), 1600, Springer Verlag (03): : 325 - 339
  • [10] Optimization of energy consumption for sunflower production using data envelopment analysis approach
    Karadas, K.
    Kulekci, M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2020, 41 (02): : 505 - 513