Global inflation forecasting and Uncertainty Assessment: Comparing ARIMA with advanced machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Alomani, Ghadah [1 ]
Kayid, Mohamed [2 ]
El-Aal, Mohamed F. Abd [3 ]
机构
[1] Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Math Sci, POB 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Stat & Operat Res, POB 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[3] Arish Univ, Fac Commerce, Econ Dept, North Sinai, Egypt
关键词
Global inflation rate; Machine learning; Gradient boosting regressor; ARIMA model; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101402
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study analyzes the effectiveness of two techniques for forecasting global inflation rates. The first is the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average, and the second is the gradient-boosted regression based on machine learning. It is worth noting that the study introduces the Gradient Boosting for univariate time series analysis. The results reveal that the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average performs better than the cross-validation using the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average, with the root mean square coefficient of 2.53, the mean average moving average error of 2.21, and the mean average moving average error of 0.48. Conversely, the gradient-boosted regression outperforms in testing on train and test datasets, achieving the root mean square coefficient of 0.078, the mean average moving average error of 0.27, and the mean average moving average error of 0.22, highlighting its potential for predictive tasks. The study concentrates on short-term forecasts of global inflation rates, thereby minimizing exposure to long-term macroeconomic risks (political and economic shocks). Both models expect global inflation rates to remain stable or decline from 2023 to 2025, providing stability in decision-making among stakeholders such as consumers and producers.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of Different Machine Learning Methods for Reservoir Outflow Forecasting
    Soria-Lopez, Anton
    Sobrido-Pouso, Carlos
    Mejuto, Juan C.
    Astray, Gonzalo
    WATER, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [32] A Review of ARIMA vs. Machine Learning Approaches for Time Series Forecasting in Data Driven Networks
    Kontopoulou, Vaia I.
    Panagopoulos, Athanasios D.
    Kakkos, Ioannis
    Matsopoulos, George K.
    FUTURE INTERNET, 2023, 15 (08):
  • [33] Financial forecasting: Advanced machine learning techniques in stock market analysis
    Yoo, Paul D.
    Kim, Maria H.
    Jan, Tony
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INMIC 2005: 9TH INTERNATIONAL MULTITOPIC CONFERENCE - PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 40 - 46
  • [34] Performance Comparison of Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for Electricity Price Forecasting
    Jana, Aryyama Kumar
    Paul, Rudrendu Kumar
    2023 NORTH AMERICAN POWER SYMPOSIUM, NAPS, 2023,
  • [35] Predicting Global Irradiance Combining Forecasting Models Through Machine Learning
    Huertas-Tato, J.
    Aler, R.
    Rodriguez-Benitez, F. J.
    Arbizu-Barrena, C.
    Pozo-Vazquez, D.
    Galvan, I. M.
    HYBRID ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (HAIS 2018), 2018, 10870 : 622 - 633
  • [36] Forecasting daily global solar irradiance generation using machine learning
    Sharma, Amandeep
    Kakkar, Ajay
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 : 2254 - 2269
  • [37] Comparing Machine Learning vs. Humans for Dietary Assessment
    Abbasi, Maryam
    Wanzeller, Cristina
    Cardoso, Filipe
    Martins, Pedro
    NEW TRENDS IN DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, TECH ETHICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, DITTET 2022, 2023, 1430 : 18 - 29
  • [38] Managing the uncertainty of conformity assessment in environmental testing by machine learning
    D'Emilia, Giulio
    Di Gasbarro, David
    Gaspari, Antonella
    Natale, Emanuela
    MEASUREMENT, 2018, 124 : 560 - 567
  • [39] China's inflation forecasting in a data-rich environment: based on machine learning algorithms
    Huang, Naijing
    Qi, Yuqing
    Xia, Jie
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [40] A comparison of time series and machine learning models for inflation forecasting: empirical evidence from the USA
    Ulke, Volkan
    Sahin, Afsin
    Subasi, Abdulhamit
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2018, 30 (05): : 1519 - 1527