Comparison of Outpatient Mechanical Cervical Ripening Methods to Standard Inpatient Ripening

被引:0
|
作者
Goering, Mary P. [1 ]
Wunderlich, Whitney L. [2 ]
Vacquier, Marc C. [2 ]
Watson, David A. [3 ]
Drake, Kelly A. [4 ]
Hoffman, Sandra I. [4 ]
Schulte, Anna [2 ]
Colicchia, Laura C. [5 ]
Sidebottom, Abbey C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Allina Hlth, United Hosp Mother Baby Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Allina Hlth, Care Delivery Res, Minneapolis, MN 55402 USA
[3] Childrens Minnesota, Childrens Minnesota Res Inst, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Allina Hlth, Abbott Northwestern Hosp Mother Baby Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Allina Hlth, Minnesota Perinatal Phys, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
cervical ripening; induction; Foley balloon; osmotic dilator; outpatient; Dilapan-S; FOLEY CATHETER; LABOR INDUCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1055/a-2553-9258
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to assess clinical efficiency and maternal and neonatal outcomes for patients who underwent outpatient cervical ripening using mechanical methods (osmotic dilators and Foley balloon) compared with patients who underwent inpatient ripening. Study Design A retrospective cohort study from March 2020 to March 2022 compared patients with low-risk, term, singleton pregnancies who underwent outpatient cervical ripening to clinically similar patients who had inpatient ripening. Inverse probability of treatment weighting for analysis of outcomes to account for differences in groups and comparisons of outcomes are reported as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The cohort included 391 patients (116 outpatient, 275 inpatient). Among the outpatient group, half used only mechanical devices, and all others received additional pharmacological methods after admission for labor induction. Among the inpatient group, the most common cervical ripening method was pharmacological only (66.2%), followed by both pharmacological and mechanical (25.8%), and 8% used only mechanical. After outpatient cervical ripening, patients had significantly higher cervical dilation (mean difference 1.9 cm, 95% CI: 1.6, 2.3) and simplified bishop scores (mean difference 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.1) on admission compared with the inpatient group. The average time from admission to delivery was 5.8 hours shorter (95% CI: -8.6, -2.9) for the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group, and the average total length of stay was 7.1 hours shorter (95% CI: -12.1, -2.1) for the outpatients among patients with vaginal deliveries. Both groups had similar hours of oxytocin use, and mode of delivery, and did not differ for maternal complications or neonatal outcomes. Conclusion Outpatient cervical ripening using multiple mechanical methods was associated with significantly higher cervical dilation, shorter average time from patient admission to delivery, and shorter total length of stay for vaginal deliveries. Outpatient cervical ripening may be an important option for easing resource utilization for induced labor.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outpatient Cervical Ripening: A Multicentered Retrospective Cohort Study
    Alavifard, Sepand
    Ashraf, Rizwana
    Chamy, Caroline
    Dong, Zi Yang
    D'Souza, Rohan
    Roberts, Surain
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 141 : 47S - 47S
  • [42] Patient Satisfaction with Outpatient Cervical Ripening in Parous Women
    Wang, Michelle J.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    George, David M.
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Edwards, Rodney K.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Mazzoni, Sara E.
    Files, Pamela
    Tita, Alan T.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Harper, Lorie M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2021, 38 : E71 - E76
  • [43] How safe is safe for outpatient cervical ripening? reply
    Sholapurkar, S. L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (13) : 1746 - 1747
  • [44] Outpatient management of pre-induction cervical ripening
    Chen, Vicky
    Sheehan, Penelope
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (15): : 2954 - 2960
  • [45] Outpatient Cervical Ripening as a Method to Support Vaginal Birth
    Stephens-Hennessy, Beth M.
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2017, 46 (03): : S12 - S12
  • [46] Outpatient compared to inpatient cervical ripening with a double balloon catheter. A pilot randomised controlled trial
    Wilkinson, C.
    Adelson, P.
    Turnbull, D.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 231 - 231
  • [47] Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient Prostin gel for cervical ripening: the FOG (Foley or Gel) trial
    Henry, A.
    Madan, A.
    Reid, R.
    Tracy, S.
    Sharpe, V
    Austin, K.
    Welsh, A.
    Challis, D.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 51 (05): : 473 - 474
  • [48] Outpatient versus inpatient cervical ripening: Individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Patabendige, M.
    Chan, F.
    Wise, M. R.
    Thompson, J. M.
    Beckmann, M.
    Saad, A. F.
    Saade, G. R.
    Subramaniam, A.
    Tita, A.
    Policiano, C.
    Clode, N.
    Henry, A.
    Haavisto, H.
    Rinne, K.
    Chen, V.
    Sheehan, P.
    Kohari, K.
    Hosier, H.
    Pierce-Williams, R.
    Berghella, V.
    Rolni, D. L.
    Mol, B. W.
    Li, W.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 : 132 - 132
  • [49] Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Saad, Antonio F.
    Gavara, Rachana
    Senguttuvan, Rosemary Noel
    Goncharov, Arena D.
    Berry, Marissa
    Eid, Joe
    Goldman, Brett
    Nutter, Ana
    Moutos, Christopher P.
    Wang, Amanda M.
    Saade, George R.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 140 (04): : 584 - 590
  • [50] Two center RCT of outpatient versus inpatient cervical ripening for induction of labour with PGE2
    Wilkinson, Chris
    Bryce, Robert
    Adelson, Pamela
    Coffey, Judy
    Coomblas, John
    Ryan, Philip
    Stamp, Georgina
    Turnbull, Deborah
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S137 - S137