Endoscopic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: First French survey of 10 patients

被引:0
|
作者
Rathat, Gauthier [1 ]
Chaumette, Maude [1 ]
Fontaine, Victoria [1 ]
Rebel, Lucie [1 ]
Pissarra, Joana [2 ]
Duflos, Claire [2 ,3 ]
Duraes, Martha [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Arnaud Villeneuve, Dept gynaecol & breast Surg, 371 Ave Doyen Gaston Giraud, F-34090 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Clin Res & Epidemiol Unit, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Montpellier, IDESP, INSERM, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
关键词
Endoscopic mastectomy; Prophylactic mastectomy; Breast reconstruction; Breast cancer; Brca; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; ONCOLOGICAL SAFETY; NATIONAL COLLEGE; RISK; GYNECOLOGISTS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102862
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: Current recommendations preconize prophylactic mastectomy for women over 30 with increased risk of breast cancer. Several surgical techniques are available to perform bilateral mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Our primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of the Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (E-NSM) technique, without robotic assistance, using a single axillary incision and with immediate reconstruction using a prepectoral prosthesis in prophylactic indications. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the risks of postoperative complications and the esthetic results. Material and methods: This is a preliminary report of a prospective single-center interventional clinical study with a final enrolment target of 20 patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete surgical procedures per ENSM. The secondary endpoints were the rate of conversions to conventional surgery, infections, hematomas, skin injury, pain and esthetic results (Breast-Q questionnaire, additional cosmetic procedures). Results: From April 2019 to June 2022, 10 patients were included for 19 procedures (9 bilateral mastectomies, 1 unilateral). All surgical procedures were complete; no conversion to conventional surgery was required. The rate of complications per procedure requiring revision surgery was 16 % (1 skin necrosis, 1 postoperative hematoma and 1 surgical site infection). No prosthesis was removed. The seroma rate was 5 %. All patients would recommend this technique and were very satisfied or satisfied with the esthetic result. A second cosmetic procedure (lipofilling) was necessary in 50 % of patients. Discussion: These preliminary data attest to the feasibility and safety of the E-NSM approach, and should be confirmed on a larger cohort and longer-term follow-up. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03838549
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Pitfalls and Challenges
    Suzanne B. Coopey
    Sunny D. Mitchell
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 24 : 2863 - 2868
  • [42] Increasing Eligibility for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Coopey, Suzanne B.
    Tang, Rong
    Lei, Lan
    Freer, Phoebe E.
    Kansal, Kari
    Colwell, Amy S.
    Gadd, Michele A.
    Specht, Michelle C.
    Austen, William G., Jr.
    Smith, Barbara L.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (10) : 3218 - 3222
  • [43] Surgical Delay in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
    Dabek, Robert J.
    McUmber, Harrison
    Driscoll, Daniel
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (06) : E38 - E39
  • [44] Sensation After Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
    Bartholomew, Alex
    Cairns, Cassandra
    Sosin, Michael
    Avila, Azalia
    Griffith, Kayla
    Thibodeau, Renee
    Bozzuto, Laura
    Tung, Shawndeep
    Haslinger, Michelle
    Fan, Kenneth
    Tousimis, Eleni
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 2) : S434 - S435
  • [45] Cup size and nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Mitchell, Sunny D.
    Willey, Shawna C.
    Feldman, Sheldon M.
    Beitsch, Peter D.
    Unzeitig, Gary Walter
    Manasseh, Donna Marie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [46] No Cancer Occurrences in 10-year Follow-up after Prophylactic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
    Boyd, Carter J.
    Bekisz, Jonathan M.
    Ramesh, Sruthi
    Hemal, Kshipra
    Guth, Amber A.
    Axelrod, Deborah M.
    Shapiro, Richard L.
    Hiotis, Karen
    Schnabel, Freya R.
    Choi, Mihye
    Karp, Nolan S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (06) : E5087
  • [47] Reply: Nipple Loss following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Colwell, Amy S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (03) : 795E - 796E
  • [48] Nipple margin assessment at the time of nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Cadili, Lina
    Pao, Jin-Si
    McKevitt, Elaine
    Dingee, Carol
    Bazzarelli, Amy
    Warburton, Rebecca
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 66 (03) : E298 - E303
  • [49] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: How Often Is the Nipple Involved?
    Edge, Stephen B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (30) : 4030 - 4032
  • [50] Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy with a skin-sparing, nipple-sparing technique as an oncological and esthetic procedure
    Casale, C.
    Sanchez Peraza, J. J.
    Almeida Valverde, L.
    Tebar Diaz, A.
    Gonzalez Delgado, B.
    CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2015, 42 (03): : 98 - 100