Endoscopic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: First French survey of 10 patients

被引:0
|
作者
Rathat, Gauthier [1 ]
Chaumette, Maude [1 ]
Fontaine, Victoria [1 ]
Rebel, Lucie [1 ]
Pissarra, Joana [2 ]
Duflos, Claire [2 ,3 ]
Duraes, Martha [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Arnaud Villeneuve, Dept gynaecol & breast Surg, 371 Ave Doyen Gaston Giraud, F-34090 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Clin Res & Epidemiol Unit, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Montpellier, IDESP, INSERM, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
关键词
Endoscopic mastectomy; Prophylactic mastectomy; Breast reconstruction; Breast cancer; Brca; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; ONCOLOGICAL SAFETY; NATIONAL COLLEGE; RISK; GYNECOLOGISTS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102862
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: Current recommendations preconize prophylactic mastectomy for women over 30 with increased risk of breast cancer. Several surgical techniques are available to perform bilateral mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Our primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of the Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (E-NSM) technique, without robotic assistance, using a single axillary incision and with immediate reconstruction using a prepectoral prosthesis in prophylactic indications. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the risks of postoperative complications and the esthetic results. Material and methods: This is a preliminary report of a prospective single-center interventional clinical study with a final enrolment target of 20 patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete surgical procedures per ENSM. The secondary endpoints were the rate of conversions to conventional surgery, infections, hematomas, skin injury, pain and esthetic results (Breast-Q questionnaire, additional cosmetic procedures). Results: From April 2019 to June 2022, 10 patients were included for 19 procedures (9 bilateral mastectomies, 1 unilateral). All surgical procedures were complete; no conversion to conventional surgery was required. The rate of complications per procedure requiring revision surgery was 16 % (1 skin necrosis, 1 postoperative hematoma and 1 surgical site infection). No prosthesis was removed. The seroma rate was 5 %. All patients would recommend this technique and were very satisfied or satisfied with the esthetic result. A second cosmetic procedure (lipofilling) was necessary in 50 % of patients. Discussion: These preliminary data attest to the feasibility and safety of the E-NSM approach, and should be confirmed on a larger cohort and longer-term follow-up. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03838549
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Increasing Eligibility for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Suzanne B. Coopey
    Rong Tang
    Lan Lei
    Phoebe E. Freer
    Kari Kansal
    Amy S. Colwell
    Michele A. Gadd
    Michelle C. Specht
    William G. Austen
    Barbara L. Smith
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20 : 3218 - 3222
  • [32] The modern approach to the nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Kopkash, Katherine
    Sisco, Mark
    Poli, Elizabeth
    Seth, Akhil
    Pesce, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 122 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [33] Unanswered questions in nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Rusby, Jennifer E.
    Smith, Barbara L.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2008, 17 (04): : 259 - 260
  • [34] Nipple-sparing mastectomy: A contemporary perspective
    Sisco, Mark
    Yao, Katharine A.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 113 (08) : 883 - 890
  • [35] Nipple-sparing mastectomy: To spare or not to spare?
    Chiba A.
    Jakub J.W.
    Hieken T.J.
    Current Surgery Reports, 4 (5)
  • [36] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Outcomes Discussion
    Cavalcante, Francisco Pimentel
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 231 (05) : 605 - 605
  • [37] Nipple-sparing mastectomy—is it worth the risk?
    Jean-Yves Petit
    Umberto Veronesi
    Visnu Lohsiriwat
    PierCarlo Rey
    Giuseppe Curigliano
    Stefano Martella
    Cristina Garusi
    Francesca De Lorenzi
    Andrea Manconi
    Edoardo Botteri
    Florence Didier
    Roberto Orecchia
    Mario Rietjens
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2011, 8 : 742 - 747
  • [38] Nipple-sparing mastectomy: considerations and techniques
    Bury, Sean
    Crosby, Melissa
    Babiera, Gildy V.
    BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2013, 2 (01) : 57 - 69
  • [39] Skin Reduction Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Jill Dietz
    Greg Fedele
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 22 : 3404 - 3404
  • [40] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Pitfalls and Challenges
    Coopey, Suzanne B.
    Mitchell, Sunny D.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (10) : 2863 - 2868