Endoscopic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: First French survey of 10 patients

被引:0
|
作者
Rathat, Gauthier [1 ]
Chaumette, Maude [1 ]
Fontaine, Victoria [1 ]
Rebel, Lucie [1 ]
Pissarra, Joana [2 ]
Duflos, Claire [2 ,3 ]
Duraes, Martha [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Arnaud Villeneuve, Dept gynaecol & breast Surg, 371 Ave Doyen Gaston Giraud, F-34090 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Clin Res & Epidemiol Unit, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Montpellier, IDESP, INSERM, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
关键词
Endoscopic mastectomy; Prophylactic mastectomy; Breast reconstruction; Breast cancer; Brca; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; ONCOLOGICAL SAFETY; NATIONAL COLLEGE; RISK; GYNECOLOGISTS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102862
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: Current recommendations preconize prophylactic mastectomy for women over 30 with increased risk of breast cancer. Several surgical techniques are available to perform bilateral mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Our primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of the Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (E-NSM) technique, without robotic assistance, using a single axillary incision and with immediate reconstruction using a prepectoral prosthesis in prophylactic indications. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the risks of postoperative complications and the esthetic results. Material and methods: This is a preliminary report of a prospective single-center interventional clinical study with a final enrolment target of 20 patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete surgical procedures per ENSM. The secondary endpoints were the rate of conversions to conventional surgery, infections, hematomas, skin injury, pain and esthetic results (Breast-Q questionnaire, additional cosmetic procedures). Results: From April 2019 to June 2022, 10 patients were included for 19 procedures (9 bilateral mastectomies, 1 unilateral). All surgical procedures were complete; no conversion to conventional surgery was required. The rate of complications per procedure requiring revision surgery was 16 % (1 skin necrosis, 1 postoperative hematoma and 1 surgical site infection). No prosthesis was removed. The seroma rate was 5 %. All patients would recommend this technique and were very satisfied or satisfied with the esthetic result. A second cosmetic procedure (lipofilling) was necessary in 50 % of patients. Discussion: These preliminary data attest to the feasibility and safety of the E-NSM approach, and should be confirmed on a larger cohort and longer-term follow-up. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03838549
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: Characteristics of Brazilian patients
    Frasson, Antonio
    Lichtenfels, Martina
    Vollbrecht, Betina
    Anton de Souza, Alessandra Borba
    Falcone, Ana Beatriz
    Barbosa, Fernanda
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : 349 - 350
  • [2] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Prophylactic and Therapeutic Indications
    Spear, Scott L.
    Willey, Shawna C.
    Feldman, Elizabeth D.
    Cocilovo, Costanza
    Sidawy, Mary
    Al-Attar, Ali
    Hannan, Catherine
    Seiboth, Laura
    Nahabedian, Maurice Y.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (05) : 1005 - 1014
  • [3] Nipple sensitivity after therapeutic or prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Tousimis, Eleni
    Tambar, Stuti
    Seevaratnam, Sulakshana
    Gulla, Aiste
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 : 197 - 198
  • [4] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Jensen, Jay Arthur
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 226 (01) : 108 - 108
  • [5] Nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Rusby, J. E.
    Smith, B. L.
    Gui, G. P. H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (03) : 305 - 316
  • [6] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Spear, Scott L.
    Hannan, Catherine M.
    Willey, Shawna C.
    Cocilovo, Costanza
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (06) : 1665 - 1673
  • [7] Prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: results of a French prospective trial
    Houvenaeghel, G.
    Cohen, M.
    Dammacco, M. A.
    D'Halluin, F.
    Regis, C.
    Gutowski, M.
    Acker, O.
    Fournier, M.
    Bannier, M.
    Lusque, A.
    Jouve, E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (03) : 296 - 301
  • [8] Inverted Nipple With Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Yim, Ji Hong
    Lee, Taik Jong
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 77 (02) : 153 - 155
  • [9] Prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: Indications, complications, and oncologic outcomes
    Muhsen, Shirin
    Moo, Tracy-Ann
    Zabor, Emily
    Stempel, Michelle
    Pusic, Andrea
    Gemignani, Mary
    Morrow, Monica
    Sacchini, Virgilio
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : 351 - 352
  • [10] Comparison of Single Incision Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Based on Initial Experience
    Lee, Hye Yoon
    Chang, Young Woo
    Yu, Da Young
    Lee, Tae Yul
    Kim, Duk Woo
    Kim, Woo Young
    Jung, Seung Pil
    Woo, Sang Uk
    Lee, Jae Bok
    Son, Gil Soo
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2021, 24 (02) : 196 - 205