Prediction of Prostate Cancer Grades Using Radiomic Features

被引:0
|
作者
Yamamoto, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Haraguchi, Takafumi [3 ]
Matsuda, Kaori [1 ]
Okazaki, Yoshio [1 ]
Kimoto, Shin [1 ]
Tanji, Nozomu [2 ]
Matsumoto, Atsushi [2 ]
Kobayashi, Yasuyuki [4 ]
Mimura, Hidefumi [5 ]
Hiraki, Takao [6 ]
机构
[1] Houshasen Daiichi Hosp, Dept Radiol, Imabari, Ehime 7940054, Japan
[2] Houshasen Daiichi Hosp, Dept Urol, Imabari, Ehime 7940054, Japan
[3] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Adv Biomed Imaging & Informat, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[4] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Informat & Commun Technol Res, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[5] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[6] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Radiol, Okayama 7008558, Japan
关键词
prostate cancer; machine learning; prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System; radiomics; Gleason score;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
We developed a machine learning model for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) grades using radiomic features of magnetic resonance imaging. 112 patients diagnosed with PCa based on prostate biopsy between January 2014 and December 2021 were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to construct two prediction models, one using radiomic features and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values (Radiomics model) and the other Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores and PSA values (PI-RADS model), to differentiate high-grade (Gleason score [GS] >= 8) from intermediate or low-grade (GS <8) PCa. Five imaging features were selected for the Radiomics model using the Gini coefficient. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. The models were compared by leave-one-out cross-validation with Ridge regularization. Furthermore, the Radiomics model was evaluated using the holdout method and represented by a nomogram. The AUC of the Radiomics and PI-RADS models differed significantly (0.799, 95% CI: 0.712-0.869; and 0.710, 95% CI: 0.617-0.792, respectively). Using holdout method, the Radiomics model yielded AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.552-0.925), sensitivity of 0.769, and specificity of 0.778. It outperformed the PI-RADS model and could be useful in predicting PCa grades, potentially aiding in determining appropriate treatment approaches in PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 30
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Homology-based approach for prognostic prediction of lung cancer using novel topologically invariant radiomic features
    Ninomiya, K.
    Arimura, H.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2020: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2021, 11313
  • [42] ASSOCIATION OF QUANTITATIVE MRI-BASED RADIOMIC FEATURES WITH PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PROSTATE CANCER
    Riva, Giulia
    Ciardo, Delia
    Marvaso, Giulia
    Raimondi, Sara
    Volpe, Stefania
    Botta, Francesca
    Bianchini, Linda
    Rojas, Damaris Patricia
    Petralia, Giuseppe
    Alessi, Sarah
    Pricolo, Paola
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    Orecchia, Roberto
    Cremonesi, Marta
    Bellomi, Massimo
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (03) : 1535 - 1535
  • [43] Prenatal prediction and typing of placental invasion using MRI deep and radiomic features
    Rongrong Xuan
    Tao Li
    Yutao Wang
    Jian Xu
    Wei Jin
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 20
  • [44] Prediction of Failure of Induction of Labor from Ultrasound Images Using Radiomic Features
    Garcia Ocana, Maria Inmaculada
    Lopez-Linares Roman, Karen
    Burgos San Cristobal, Jorge
    del Campo Real, Ana
    Macia Oliver, Ivan
    SMART ULTRASOUND IMAGING AND PERINATAL, PRETERM AND PAEDIATRIC IMAGE ANALYSIS, SUSI 2019, PIPPI 2019, 2019, 11798 : 153 - 160
  • [45] Overall Survival Prediction in Gliomas Using Region-Specific Radiomic Features
    Shaheen, Asma
    Burigat, Stefano
    Bagci, Ulas
    Mohy-ud-Din, Hassan
    MACHINE LEARNING IN CLINICAL NEUROIMAGING AND RADIOGENOMICS IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY, MLCN 2020, RNO-AI 2020, 2020, 12449 : 259 - 267
  • [46] Prediction of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Brain Metastasis Lesion Control Using Radiomic Features
    Yeung, T. P. C.
    Rodrigues, G.
    Lagerwaard, F.
    Palacios, M.
    Bohoudi, O.
    Bruynzeel, A.
    Mattonen, S. A.
    Warner, A.
    Johnson, C.
    Ward, A. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : S7 - S7
  • [47] PREDICTION PERFORMANCE OF RADIOMIC FEATURES WHEN OBTAINED USING AN OBJECT DETECTION FRAMEWORK
    Chegraoui, Hamza
    Rebei, Amine
    Philippe, Cathy
    Frouin, Vincent
    2021 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2021, : 1382 - 1385
  • [48] Robustness of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography radiomic features in prostate cancer: Impact on recurrence prediction after radiation therapy
    Dutta, Arpita
    Chan, Joseph
    Haworth, Annette
    Dubowitz, David J.
    Kneebone, Andrew
    Reynolds, Hayley M.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 29
  • [49] Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using Radiomic Analysis
    Chaddad, Ahmad
    Niazi, Tamim
    Probst, Stephan
    Bladou, Franck
    Anidjar, Maurice
    Bahoric, Boris
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8
  • [50] Detecting localised prostate cancer using radiomic features in PSMA PET and multiparametric MRI for biologically targeted radiation therapy
    Chan, Tsz Him
    Haworth, Annette
    Wang, Alan
    Osanlouy, Mahyar
    Williams, Scott
    Mitchell, Catherine
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Hicks, Rodney J.
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Reynolds, Hayley M.
    EJNMMI RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (01)