Prediction of Prostate Cancer Grades Using Radiomic Features

被引:0
|
作者
Yamamoto, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Haraguchi, Takafumi [3 ]
Matsuda, Kaori [1 ]
Okazaki, Yoshio [1 ]
Kimoto, Shin [1 ]
Tanji, Nozomu [2 ]
Matsumoto, Atsushi [2 ]
Kobayashi, Yasuyuki [4 ]
Mimura, Hidefumi [5 ]
Hiraki, Takao [6 ]
机构
[1] Houshasen Daiichi Hosp, Dept Radiol, Imabari, Ehime 7940054, Japan
[2] Houshasen Daiichi Hosp, Dept Urol, Imabari, Ehime 7940054, Japan
[3] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Adv Biomed Imaging & Informat, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[4] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Informat & Commun Technol Res, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[5] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[6] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Radiol, Okayama 7008558, Japan
关键词
prostate cancer; machine learning; prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System; radiomics; Gleason score;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
We developed a machine learning model for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) grades using radiomic features of magnetic resonance imaging. 112 patients diagnosed with PCa based on prostate biopsy between January 2014 and December 2021 were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to construct two prediction models, one using radiomic features and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values (Radiomics model) and the other Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores and PSA values (PI-RADS model), to differentiate high-grade (Gleason score [GS] >= 8) from intermediate or low-grade (GS <8) PCa. Five imaging features were selected for the Radiomics model using the Gini coefficient. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. The models were compared by leave-one-out cross-validation with Ridge regularization. Furthermore, the Radiomics model was evaluated using the holdout method and represented by a nomogram. The AUC of the Radiomics and PI-RADS models differed significantly (0.799, 95% CI: 0.712-0.869; and 0.710, 95% CI: 0.617-0.792, respectively). Using holdout method, the Radiomics model yielded AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.552-0.925), sensitivity of 0.769, and specificity of 0.778. It outperformed the PI-RADS model and could be useful in predicting PCa grades, potentially aiding in determining appropriate treatment approaches in PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 30
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Radiomic features for prostate cancer grade detection through formal verification
    Antonella Santone
    Maria Chiara Brunese
    Federico Donnarumma
    Pasquale Guerriero
    Francesco Mercaldo
    Alfonso Reginelli
    Vittorio Miele
    Andrea Giovagnoni
    Luca Brunese
    La radiologia medica, 2021, 126 : 688 - 697
  • [22] A Framework of Analysis to Facilitate the Harmonization of Multicenter Radiomic Features in Prostate Cancer
    Castaldo, Rossana
    Brancato, Valentina
    Cavaliere, Carlo
    Trama, Francesco
    Illiano, Ester
    Costantini, Elisabetta
    Ragozzino, Alfonso
    Salvatore, Marco
    Nicolai, Emanuele
    Franzese, Monica
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [23] Radiomic features for prostate cancer grade detection through formal verification
    Santone, Antonella
    Brunese, Maria Chiara
    Donnarumma, Federico
    Guerriero, Pasquale
    Mercaldo, Francesco
    Reginelli, Alfonso
    Miele, Vittorio
    Giovagnoni, Andrea
    Brunese, Luca
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2021, 126 (05): : 688 - 697
  • [24] Prediction of Alzheimer?s Using Random Forest with Radiomic Features
    Singh, Anuj
    Kumar, Raman
    Tiwari, Arvind Kumar
    COMPUTER SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 45 (01): : 513 - 530
  • [25] Radiomic features based on MRI for prediction of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer
    Yu Fu
    Xiangchun Liu
    Qi Yang
    Jianqing Sun
    Yunming Xie
    Yiying Zhang
    Huimao Zhang
    Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology, 2019, 2 : 13 - 22
  • [26] Immunohistochemistry and Radiomic Features for Survival Prediction in Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Gkika, Eleni
    Benndorf, Matthias
    Oerther, Benedict
    Mohammad, Farid
    Beitinger, Susanne
    Adebahr, Sonja
    Carles, Montserrat
    Schimek-Jasch, Tanja
    Zamboglou, Constantinos
    Frye, Bjorn C.
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Waller, Cornelius F.
    Werner, Martin
    Grosu, Anca L.
    Nestle, Ursula
    Kayser, Gian
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [27] Radiomic features based on MRI for prediction of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer
    Fu, Yu
    Liu, Xiangchun
    Yang, Qi
    Sun, Jianqing
    Xie, Yunming
    Zhang, Yiying
    Zhang, Huimao
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 2 (1-2) : 13 - 22
  • [28] DIAGNOSIS OF CLINICAL SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER ON BIPARAMETRIC MRI USING ZONE-SPECIFIC RADIOMIC FEATURES
    Mylona, Eugenia
    Zaridis, Dimitrios
    Tachos, Nikolaos
    Tsiknakis, Manolis
    Marias, Kostas
    Fotiadis, Dimitrios I.
    2023 IEEE 20TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING, ISBI, 2023,
  • [29] Comparison prediction models of bladder toxicity based on radiomic features of CT and MRI in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy
    Tavakkoli, Mohammad Bagher
    Abedi, Iraj
    Abdollahi, Hamid
    Amouheidari, Alireza
    Azmoonfar, Rasool
    Saber, Korosh
    Hassaninejad, Hossein
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2024, 55 (04)
  • [30] Clinically significant prostate cancer detection on MRI: A radiomic shape features study
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    Ponsiglione, Andrea
    Romeo, Valeria
    Verde, Francesco
    Creta, Massimiliano
    La Rocca, Roberto
    Longo, Nicola
    Pace, Leonardo
    Imbriaco, Massimo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 116 : 144 - 149