Clinical factors influencing residual subcutaneous tissue after skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction

被引:0
|
作者
Turna, Menekse [1 ]
Caglar, Hale Basak [1 ]
机构
[1] Anadolu Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kocaeli, Turkiye
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
residual fibroglandular tissue; skin-sparing mastectomy; nipple-sparing mastectomy; breast reconstruction; postoperative radiotherapy; CONSERVING SURGERY; RECURRENCE RATES; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CANCER;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2025.1516479
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have emerged as increasingly preferred alternatives to traditional mastectomy, largely due to their enhanced cosmetic outcomes and elevated levels of patient satisfaction. Nonetheless, the oncological safety and implications associated with residual breast tissue in these surgical procedures continue to raise significant concerns. The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of various clinical and surgical factors on residual subcutaneous tissue in patients undergoing SSM and NSM. Methods: This retrospective cohort study encompassed breast cancer patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy following SSM and NSM with immediate breast reconstruction from November 2020 to April 2024. Clinical and demographic data, including age, tumor size, axillary staging, molecular subtype, genetic analysis, and surgical details, were systematically collected. Additionally, radiation treatment planning CT scans were assessed to measure residual subcutaneous tissue thickness at multiple anatomical regions. The correlation between residual subcutaneous tissue thickness and clinical factors was subsequently analyzed. Results: The median age was 45 years (range, 31-61). Among the total patients, 20 underwent SSM (52.63%), and 18 underwent NSM (47.37%). An acceptable residual subcutaneous tissue distance (<= 5 mm) was observed in 21 breasts (55.26%), while 17 breasts (44.74%) did not meet this criterion. Analysis demonstrated a statistically significant but modest positive correlation between RFT thickness and age (r = 0.38, p = 0.02), minimal positive correlation was observed between RFT thickness and clinical tumor size (r = 0.08, p = 0.042). A significant effect of contralateral breast surgery on residual subcutaneous tissue thickness was noted (F = 8.38, p < 0.001). Additionally, the results also revealed a statistically significant inverse correlation between RFT thickness and axillary involvement (r = -0.18, p = 0.005), suggesting that thicker flaps are associated with reduced axillary involvement. There was no significant difference in RFT thickness between NSM and SSM groups (Chi(2) = 0.47, p = 0.491). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients undergoing SSM and NSM exhibit residual subcutaneous tissue thickness that exceeds acceptable limits, which may vary based on clinical and pathological factors. Further research involving larger cohorts and prospective designs is essential to identify additional contributing factors and optimize indications for postoperative radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Retrospective Comparison of Non-Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Skin-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Kinoshita, Satoki
    Nojima, Kimihiro
    Takeishi, Meisei
    Imawari, Yoshimi
    Kyoda, Shigeya
    Hirano, Akio
    Akiba, Tadashi
    Kobayashi, Susumu
    Takeyama, Hiroshi
    Uchida, Ken
    Morikawa, Toshiaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 2011
  • [32] Skin-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Nipple Graft for Large, Ptotic Breast
    Kim, Eun Key
    Cho, Jeong Mok
    Lee, Jong Won
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2019, 22 (04) : 641 - 646
  • [33] Post-operative Irradiation after Nipple-Sparing or Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: An International Survey
    Marta, G. N.
    Poortmans, P.
    Audisio, R. A.
    Freitas Junior, R.
    De Barros, A. C.
    Filassi, J. R.
    DeSnyder, S. M.
    Meterissian, S.
    Buchholz, T. A.
    Hijal, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S642 - S642
  • [34] Nipple-Sparing, Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: An 11-Year Retrospective Study
    Corbitt, John, Jr.
    Anthony, Lori
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) : S167 - S167
  • [35] Oncologic Safety of Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Discussion and Review of the Literature
    Tokin, Christopher
    Weiss, Anna
    Wang-Rodriguez, Jessica
    Blair, Sarah L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 2012
  • [36] Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: Review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications
    Galimberti, Viviana
    Vicini, Elisa
    Corso, Giovanni
    Morigi, Consuelo
    Fontana, Sabrina
    Sacchini, Virgilio
    Veronesi, Paolo
    BREAST, 2017, 34 : S82 - S84
  • [37] Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Gel Implant
    Hung-Wen Lai
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 26 : 53 - 54
  • [38] Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Gel Implant
    Lai, Hung-Wen
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (01) : 53 - 54
  • [39] Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Gel Implant
    Lai, Hung-Wen
    Lin, Shih-Lung
    Chen, Shou-Tung
    Chen, Shu-Ling
    Lin, Ya-Ling
    Chen, Dar-Ren
    Kuo, Shou-Jen
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (06)
  • [40] Immediate Versus Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Barnes, Laura L.
    Patterson, Anne
    Lem, Melinda
    Holland, Michael C.
    Lentz, Rachel
    Sbitany, Hani
    Piper, Merisa L.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 90 (05) : 432 - 436