Clinical factors influencing residual subcutaneous tissue after skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction

被引:0
|
作者
Turna, Menekse [1 ]
Caglar, Hale Basak [1 ]
机构
[1] Anadolu Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kocaeli, Turkiye
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
residual fibroglandular tissue; skin-sparing mastectomy; nipple-sparing mastectomy; breast reconstruction; postoperative radiotherapy; CONSERVING SURGERY; RECURRENCE RATES; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CANCER;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2025.1516479
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have emerged as increasingly preferred alternatives to traditional mastectomy, largely due to their enhanced cosmetic outcomes and elevated levels of patient satisfaction. Nonetheless, the oncological safety and implications associated with residual breast tissue in these surgical procedures continue to raise significant concerns. The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of various clinical and surgical factors on residual subcutaneous tissue in patients undergoing SSM and NSM. Methods: This retrospective cohort study encompassed breast cancer patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy following SSM and NSM with immediate breast reconstruction from November 2020 to April 2024. Clinical and demographic data, including age, tumor size, axillary staging, molecular subtype, genetic analysis, and surgical details, were systematically collected. Additionally, radiation treatment planning CT scans were assessed to measure residual subcutaneous tissue thickness at multiple anatomical regions. The correlation between residual subcutaneous tissue thickness and clinical factors was subsequently analyzed. Results: The median age was 45 years (range, 31-61). Among the total patients, 20 underwent SSM (52.63%), and 18 underwent NSM (47.37%). An acceptable residual subcutaneous tissue distance (<= 5 mm) was observed in 21 breasts (55.26%), while 17 breasts (44.74%) did not meet this criterion. Analysis demonstrated a statistically significant but modest positive correlation between RFT thickness and age (r = 0.38, p = 0.02), minimal positive correlation was observed between RFT thickness and clinical tumor size (r = 0.08, p = 0.042). A significant effect of contralateral breast surgery on residual subcutaneous tissue thickness was noted (F = 8.38, p < 0.001). Additionally, the results also revealed a statistically significant inverse correlation between RFT thickness and axillary involvement (r = -0.18, p = 0.005), suggesting that thicker flaps are associated with reduced axillary involvement. There was no significant difference in RFT thickness between NSM and SSM groups (Chi(2) = 0.47, p = 0.491). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients undergoing SSM and NSM exhibit residual subcutaneous tissue thickness that exceeds acceptable limits, which may vary based on clinical and pathological factors. Further research involving larger cohorts and prospective designs is essential to identify additional contributing factors and optimize indications for postoperative radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Esthetic evaluation of immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy
    Mori H.
    Umeda T.
    Osanai T.
    Hata Y.
    Breast Cancer, 2005, 12 (4) : 299 - 303
  • [2] Subcutaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Shi, Aiping
    Wu, Di
    Li, Xingliang
    Zhang, Shifu
    Li, Sijie
    Xu, Hui
    Xie, Huijun
    Fan, Zhimin
    BREAST CARE, 2012, 7 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [3] Factors Predicting Locoregional Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Nipple-Sparing/Skin-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Wu, Zhen-Yu
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    Lee, Jong Won
    Chung, Il Yong
    Kim, Jisun
    Lee, Sae Byul
    Son, Byung-Ho
    Eom, Jin Sup
    Jeong, Jae Ho
    Gong, Gyungyub
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Ahn, Sei-Hyun
    Ko, BeomSeok
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [4] Risk Factors for Complications after Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Paprottka, Felix J.
    Schlett, Christopher L.
    Luketina, Rosalia
    Paprottka, Karolin
    Klimas, Dalius
    Radtke, Christine
    Hebebrand, Detlev
    BREAST CARE, 2019, 14 (05) : 289 - 296
  • [5] Patterns of recurrence in breast cancer patients after nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy
    Alvarado, L.
    Mahmoud, D.
    Franco, R.
    Poortmans, P.
    Kaidar-Person, O.
    Hijal, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S171 - S172
  • [6] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Chen, Constance M.
    Disa, Joseph J.
    Sacchini, Virgilio
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Garcia-Etienne, Carlos A.
    Cordeiro, Peter G.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 124 (06) : 1772 - 1780
  • [7] Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate tissue reconstruction
    Rand, RP
    Byrd, DR
    Anderson, BO
    Moe, R
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 164 (02): : 166 - 166
  • [8] Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
    Vlastos, Georges
    Elias, Badwi
    Meyer, Olna
    Harder, Yves
    Schaefer, Pierre
    Pittet, Brigitte
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2007, 94 (09) : 833 - 840
  • [9] Reverse Expansion for Breast Reconstruction after Skin-sparing and Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: Our First 100 Cases
    Fabiocchi, Luca
    Lucattelli, Elena
    Cattin, Federico
    Cipriani, Federico
    Dellachiesa, Laura
    Fogacci, Tommaso
    Frisoni, Gianluca
    Semprini, Gloria
    Samorani, Domenico
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (04) : E4915
  • [10] Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy - goals, pitfalls, contraindications
    Galimberti, V.
    BREAST, 2017, 32 : S14 - S14