User perceptions of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in orthopaedic surgery in a tertiary Australian hospital

被引:0
|
作者
Hassan, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Vincent [1 ]
Stevens, Julie E. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Stupans, Ieva [1 ]
Gentle, Juliette [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Hlth & Biomed Sci, Pharm, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[2] Northern Hlth, Dept Orthopaed, Epping, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Clin & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide Med Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Epping, Vic, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2025年 / 20卷 / 03期
关键词
CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0319829
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis remains the most common indication for antimicrobial use in Australian hospitals. Despite efforts to improve practice, adherence to guideline recommendations continues to be suboptimal across surgical disciplines, including orthopaedics. The Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic v16 currently advocates for single dose prophylaxis for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) procedures. Audits undertaken in one Australian tertiary hospital have identified low levels of adherence to this recommendation. It is unclear as to why guidelines are not adhered to in this setting.Aim To understand the factors that influence multidose prescribing for ORIF procedures and the barriers and enablers to guideline use in an Australian tertiary hospital.Materials and methods Interviews (focus groups and one-on-one sessions) were held with orthopaedic surgeons (consultants), orthopaedic registrars, pharmacists, and anaesthetists from a tertiary public hospital in Australia. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to analyse results.Results Six focus groups and three one-on-one interviews were conducted. Data were mapped to 12 TDF domains. Although clinicians were aware of guideline recommendations, this alone did not encourage the use of single dose prophylaxis. The decision to prescribe postoperative antibiotics was influenced by a combination of patient and environmental factors as well as fear of infection development. The lack of guideline specificity was commonly highlighted as a barrier to guideline use, as well as lack of agreement with guideline content. Enablers to guideline use included education that was targeted and repetitive, as well as improved dissemination of guidelines.Conclusion There are myriad factors that influence the decision to prescribe postoperative antibiotics for ORIF procedures. By understanding the social and cultural context of a local setting and the barriers and enablers that pertain to an environment, interventions can be developed to enhance guideline use, thereby improving antimicrobial prescribing.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SUMMARY OF ASHP THERAPEUTIC GUIDELINES ON ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS IN SURGERY
    BARRIERE, SL
    CONNORS, J
    DANZIGER, LM
    DIPIRO, JT
    FLAHERTY, JF
    GUGLIELMO, BJ
    KRETER, B
    RAPP, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1992, 49 (06): : 1493 - 1494
  • [32] ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS IN SURGERY - GENERAL CONCEPTS AND CLINICAL GUIDELINES
    MARTIN, C
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 15 (07): : 463 - 471
  • [33] Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and compliance with the standard treatment guidelines in acute appendectomy at tertiary care teaching hospital
    Khan, Zakir
    Ahmed, Naveed
    Karatas, Yusuf
    CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 44 : 49 - 53
  • [34] Compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis at an Australian teaching hospital
    Friedman, N. Deborah
    Styles, Kaylene
    Gray, Ann M.
    Low, Jillian
    Athan, Eugene
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2013, 41 (01) : 71 - 74
  • [35] Assessment of implementability of an adapted clinical practice guideline for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis at a tertiary care university hospital
    Altokhais, Tariq I.
    Al-Obaid, Omar A.
    Kattan, Abdullah E.
    Amer, Yasser S.
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 23 (01) : 156 - 164
  • [36] Knowledge and practice of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis at a tertiary academic hospital in a low-middle income country
    Yu, Y. C.
    Steadman, C.
    Chetty, S.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2023, 29 (05) : 171 - 177
  • [37] Pharmaceutical cost comparison analysis of antimicrobial use for surgical prophylaxis on gastrectomy patients in a tertiary care hospital
    Ise, Y
    Hagiwara, K
    Onda, M
    Kamei, M
    Katayama, S
    Nishizawa, K
    Hirano, M
    Kiyama, T
    CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 51 (06) : 384 - 386
  • [38] Appropriateness of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices in a Public Hospital
    Ahmad, Nehad J.
    Alqadi, Kamal
    Haseeb, Abdul
    Hassali, Azmi Ahmed
    Khan, Amer H.
    LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY, 2021, 40 (01): : 195 - 200
  • [39] An Audit of Surgical Antimicrobial prophylaxis at University Hospital Limerick
    Byrne, D.
    Nilan, J.
    Power, L.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 186 : S177 - S178
  • [40] Double blind randomized controlled trial for subjects undergoing surgery receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis at tertiary hospital: the clinical pharmacist's interventions
    Elnour, Asim Ahmed
    Al-Khidir, Israa Y.
    Elkheir, Habab
    Elkhawad, Abdalla
    Mohammed, O. Ahmed A.
    Khalid, A. Al-Kubaissi
    Nahar, Ghadah
    Alrwili, Shahad Fayad
    Alshelaly, Donia Ahmed
    Saleh, Amjad
    Aljaber, Latefa Khulif
    Alrashedi, Abrar Ayad
    PHARMACY PRACTICE-GRANADA, 2022, 20 (04):