User perceptions of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in orthopaedic surgery in a tertiary Australian hospital

被引:0
|
作者
Hassan, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Vincent [1 ]
Stevens, Julie E. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Stupans, Ieva [1 ]
Gentle, Juliette [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Hlth & Biomed Sci, Pharm, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[2] Northern Hlth, Dept Orthopaed, Epping, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Clin & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide Med Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Epping, Vic, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2025年 / 20卷 / 03期
关键词
CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0319829
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis remains the most common indication for antimicrobial use in Australian hospitals. Despite efforts to improve practice, adherence to guideline recommendations continues to be suboptimal across surgical disciplines, including orthopaedics. The Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic v16 currently advocates for single dose prophylaxis for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) procedures. Audits undertaken in one Australian tertiary hospital have identified low levels of adherence to this recommendation. It is unclear as to why guidelines are not adhered to in this setting.Aim To understand the factors that influence multidose prescribing for ORIF procedures and the barriers and enablers to guideline use in an Australian tertiary hospital.Materials and methods Interviews (focus groups and one-on-one sessions) were held with orthopaedic surgeons (consultants), orthopaedic registrars, pharmacists, and anaesthetists from a tertiary public hospital in Australia. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to analyse results.Results Six focus groups and three one-on-one interviews were conducted. Data were mapped to 12 TDF domains. Although clinicians were aware of guideline recommendations, this alone did not encourage the use of single dose prophylaxis. The decision to prescribe postoperative antibiotics was influenced by a combination of patient and environmental factors as well as fear of infection development. The lack of guideline specificity was commonly highlighted as a barrier to guideline use, as well as lack of agreement with guideline content. Enablers to guideline use included education that was targeted and repetitive, as well as improved dissemination of guidelines.Conclusion There are myriad factors that influence the decision to prescribe postoperative antibiotics for ORIF procedures. By understanding the social and cultural context of a local setting and the barriers and enablers that pertain to an environment, interventions can be developed to enhance guideline use, thereby improving antimicrobial prescribing.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ASHP THERAPEUTIC GUIDELINES ON ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS IN SURGERY
    BARRIERE, SL
    CONNORS, J
    DANZIGER, LH
    DIPIRO, JT
    FLAHERTY, JF
    GUGLIELMO, BJ
    KRETER, B
    RAPP, RP
    CLINICAL PHARMACY, 1992, 11 (06): : 483 - 513
  • [22] Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery
    Bratzler, Dale W.
    Dellinger, E. Patchen
    Olsen, Keith M.
    Perl, Trish M.
    Auwaerter, Paul G.
    Bolon, Maureen K.
    Fish, Douglas N.
    Napolitano, Lena M.
    Sawyer, Robert G.
    Slain, Douglas
    Steinberg, James P.
    Weinstein, Robert A.
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2013, 14 (01) : 73 - 156
  • [24] Impact of a persuasive antimicrobial stewardship programme on the appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in a tertiary care hospital in southern Italy
    Onorato, Lorenzo
    Macera, Margherita
    Curatolo, Caterina
    Pattapola, Viraj
    Zollo, Verdiana
    Monari, Caterina
    Calo, Federica
    Faraone, Pasquale Di Girolamo
    Russo, Ferdinando
    Coppola, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2024, 39 : 122 - 127
  • [25] Evaluation of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in a Teaching hospital
    Melo, Matheus Santos
    Carvaiho, Thialla Andrade
    Tavares Mattos, Maria Claudia
    Aguiar Campos, Maria Pontes
    Mendoca, Simonize Barreto
    Fraga Lobo, Iza Maria
    REVISTA DE EPIDEMIOLOGIA E CONTROLE DE INFECCAO, 2019, 9 (01): : 79 - 84
  • [26] An evaluation of hospital antimicrobial prescribing for surgical prophylaxis
    Stewart, Lee
    Chua, Lah Keng
    Wong, Leone K. M.
    Hudson, Stephen
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2010, 32 (02): : 254 - 254
  • [27] Assessment of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in Orthopaedics and Traumatology Surgical Unit of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Addis Ababa
    Argaw N.A.
    Shumbash K.Z.
    Asfaw A.A.
    Hawaze S.
    BMC Research Notes, 10 (1)
  • [28] Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Knowledge and Practices of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital
    Khan, Fatima
    Chaudhary, Bhanu
    Sultan, Asfia
    Ahmad, Manzoor
    Alvi, Yasir
    Shah, Mohammad Salman
    Khan, Haris M.
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2021, 22 (04) : 434 - 441
  • [29] ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS FOR SURGICAL WOUNDS - GUIDELINES FOR CLINICAL CARE
    PAGE, CP
    BOHNEN, JMA
    FLETCHER, JR
    MCMANUS, AT
    SOLOMKIN, JS
    WITTMANN, DH
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1993, 128 (01) : 79 - 88
  • [30] Surgeons' adherence to guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis a review
    Ng, Ru Shing
    Chong, Chee Ping
    AUSTRALASIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 5 (10): : 534 - 540