User perceptions of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in orthopaedic surgery in a tertiary Australian hospital

被引:0
|
作者
Hassan, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Vincent [1 ]
Stevens, Julie E. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Stupans, Ieva [1 ]
Gentle, Juliette [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Hlth & Biomed Sci, Pharm, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[2] Northern Hlth, Dept Orthopaed, Epping, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Clin & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide Med Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Epping, Vic, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2025年 / 20卷 / 03期
关键词
CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0319829
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis remains the most common indication for antimicrobial use in Australian hospitals. Despite efforts to improve practice, adherence to guideline recommendations continues to be suboptimal across surgical disciplines, including orthopaedics. The Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic v16 currently advocates for single dose prophylaxis for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) procedures. Audits undertaken in one Australian tertiary hospital have identified low levels of adherence to this recommendation. It is unclear as to why guidelines are not adhered to in this setting.Aim To understand the factors that influence multidose prescribing for ORIF procedures and the barriers and enablers to guideline use in an Australian tertiary hospital.Materials and methods Interviews (focus groups and one-on-one sessions) were held with orthopaedic surgeons (consultants), orthopaedic registrars, pharmacists, and anaesthetists from a tertiary public hospital in Australia. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to analyse results.Results Six focus groups and three one-on-one interviews were conducted. Data were mapped to 12 TDF domains. Although clinicians were aware of guideline recommendations, this alone did not encourage the use of single dose prophylaxis. The decision to prescribe postoperative antibiotics was influenced by a combination of patient and environmental factors as well as fear of infection development. The lack of guideline specificity was commonly highlighted as a barrier to guideline use, as well as lack of agreement with guideline content. Enablers to guideline use included education that was targeted and repetitive, as well as improved dissemination of guidelines.Conclusion There are myriad factors that influence the decision to prescribe postoperative antibiotics for ORIF procedures. By understanding the social and cultural context of a local setting and the barriers and enablers that pertain to an environment, interventions can be developed to enhance guideline use, thereby improving antimicrobial prescribing.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adherence to the guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in a Saudi tertiary care hospital
    Alahmadi, Yaser M.
    Alharbi, Raed H.
    Aljabri, Ahmad K.
    Alofi, Fadwa S.
    Alshaalani, Omimah A.
    Alssdi, Baiaan H.
    JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 15 (02): : 136 - 141
  • [2] EVALUATION OF SURGICAL ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS IN ICUS OF A PRIVATE TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
    Tiwari, P.
    Mothe, R.
    Malhotra, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A296 - A296
  • [3] Compliance with guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery
    Candell Vilarrasa, L.
    Garcia Pardo, G.
    Olona, M.
    Torrent, J.
    Castillo Palomares, M. L.
    Garcia Forcada, I. L.
    Canela Subirada, M.
    Sanchez Pacheco, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2012, 34 (01) : 246 - 247
  • [4] Audit of the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in nasal surgery at a specialist Australian hospital
    Colgan, SJ
    Mc Mullan, C
    Davies, GE
    Sizeland, AM
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 75 (12) : 1090 - 1095
  • [5] Antimicrobial agents in orthopaedic surgery - Prophylaxis and treatment
    Trampuz, Andrej
    Zimmerli, Werner
    DRUGS, 2006, 66 (08) : 1089 - 1105
  • [6] Antimicrobial prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery: the role of teicoplanin
    Periti, P
    Mini, E
    Mosconi, G
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 41 (03) : 329 - 340
  • [7] SURGICAL ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS - PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES
    BURNAKIS, TG
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1984, 4 (05): : 248 - 271
  • [8] Evaluation of local guideline introduction on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis prescribing for open reduction internal fixations at an Australian tertiary hospital
    Hassan, Sarah
    Chan, Vincent
    Stevens, Julie E.
    Stupans, Ieva
    Gentle, Juliette
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2024, 54 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [9] Appraisal of the Australian Veterinary Prescribing Guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery in dogs and cats
    Hardefeldt, L. Y.
    Crabb, H. K.
    Bailey, K. E.
    Johnstone, T.
    Gilkersoe, J. R.
    Billman-Jacobe, H.
    Browning, G. F.
    AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2019, 97 (09) : 316 - 322
  • [10] Perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use at an urban tertiary hospital in Tanzania
    Mmari, Elizabeth E.
    Pallangyo, Eunice S.
    Ali, Athar
    Kaale, Dereck A.
    Mawalla, Isaac H.
    Abeid, Muzdalifat S.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):