Interfacial and foaming properties of plant and microbial proteins: Comparison of structure-function behavior of different proteins

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Xinyu [1 ]
Liu, Zhe [1 ]
Ma, Xiaojie [1 ]
Zheng, Yicheng [1 ]
Hu, Hui [1 ]
Jiao, Bo [1 ]
McClements, David Julian [2 ]
Wang, Qiang [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Shi, Aimin [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Food Sci & Technol, Minist Agr & Rural, Comprehens Utilizat Lab Cereal & Oil Proc, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Food Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[3] Xinjiang Agr Univ, Coll Food Sci & Pharm, Urumqi 830052, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Food Sci & Engn, Jiangsu Modern Food Circulat & Safety Collaborat I, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Plant and microbial proteins; Structural composition; Physicochemical properties; Foaming properties; Correlation analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141431
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Many plant proteins are amphiphilic molecules that can adsorb to air-water interfaces and form protective coatings around gas bubbles. In this study, the composition, structure, physicochemical properties, air-water interfacial properties, and foaming properties of 16 plant and microbial proteins were characterized. We found a correlation between the composition, structure, physicochemical properties, and foaming properties of the proteins. The foaming capacity of them showed a highly significant positive correlation (p <= 0.01) with their foaming stability, alpha-helix content, surface hydrophobicity, and free sulfhydryl content. The foaming capacity and foaming stability showed highly significant negative correlations with disulfide bond content (p <= 0.01). We found wheat gluten protein (WGP) and mung bean protein (MBP) had higher foaming capacity (102.67 +/- 8.08 % and 89.33 +/- 4.72 %), which could be attributed to higher surface hydrophobicity (179.68 +/- 1.40 and 130.28 +/- 1.41) and larger contact angle (82.369 +/- 0.016 degrees and 82.949 +/- 0.228 degrees).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Structural biology and structure-function relationships of membrane proteins
    Reis, Rosana
    Moraes, Isabel
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2019, 47 : 47 - 61
  • [32] Structure-function studies of membrane receptor proteins.
    Smith, SO
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 219 : U288 - U288
  • [33] CURRENT TRENDS IN STUDIES OF STRUCTURE-FUNCTION RELATIONSHIPS OF PROTEINS
    FEENEY, RE
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1972, 164 (AUG-S): : 7 - &
  • [34] Biosensor characterization of structure-function relationships in viral proteins
    Choulier, L
    Altschuh, D
    Zeder-Lutz, G
    Van Regenmortel, MHV
    MICROBIAL IMAGING, 2005, 34 : 213 - 238
  • [35] STUDIES OF STRUCTURE-FUNCTION RELATIONSHIP OF INSECT ANTIFREEZE PROTEINS
    TANG, W
    BAUST, JG
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1994, 8 (07): : A1353 - A1353
  • [36] Yeast - a panacea for the structure-function analysis of membrane proteins?
    Bill, RM
    CURRENT GENETICS, 2001, 40 (03) : 157 - 171
  • [37] USE OF REPORTER GROUPS IN STRUCTURE-FUNCTION STUDIES OF PROTEINS
    BURR, M
    KOSHLAND, DE
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1964, 52 (04) : 1017 - &
  • [38] Structure-function analysis of atonal related proteins in neurogenesis
    Quan, Xiao-Jiang
    Vilain, Sven
    Choi, Chingman
    Yan, Jiekun
    Hassan, Bassem
    JOURNAL OF NEUROGENETICS, 2006, 20 (3-4) : 205 - 206
  • [39] Structure-function relationships in different MFE-2 proteins by various biophysical techniques
    Mehtala, Maija
    Haataja, Tatu
    Blanchet, Clement
    Lensink, Marc
    Hiltunen, Kalervo
    Svergun, Dmitri
    Glumoff, Tuomo
    EUROPEAN BIOPHYSICS JOURNAL WITH BIOPHYSICS LETTERS, 2011, 40 : 139 - 139
  • [40] Comparisons of the foaming and interfacial properties of whey protein isolate and egg white proteins
    Davis, J. P.
    Foegeding, E. A.
    COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES, 2007, 54 (02) : 200 - 210