Interfacial and foaming properties of plant and microbial proteins: Comparison of structure-function behavior of different proteins

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Xinyu [1 ]
Liu, Zhe [1 ]
Ma, Xiaojie [1 ]
Zheng, Yicheng [1 ]
Hu, Hui [1 ]
Jiao, Bo [1 ]
McClements, David Julian [2 ]
Wang, Qiang [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Shi, Aimin [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Food Sci & Technol, Minist Agr & Rural, Comprehens Utilizat Lab Cereal & Oil Proc, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Food Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[3] Xinjiang Agr Univ, Coll Food Sci & Pharm, Urumqi 830052, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Food Sci & Engn, Jiangsu Modern Food Circulat & Safety Collaborat I, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Plant and microbial proteins; Structural composition; Physicochemical properties; Foaming properties; Correlation analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141431
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Many plant proteins are amphiphilic molecules that can adsorb to air-water interfaces and form protective coatings around gas bubbles. In this study, the composition, structure, physicochemical properties, air-water interfacial properties, and foaming properties of 16 plant and microbial proteins were characterized. We found a correlation between the composition, structure, physicochemical properties, and foaming properties of the proteins. The foaming capacity of them showed a highly significant positive correlation (p <= 0.01) with their foaming stability, alpha-helix content, surface hydrophobicity, and free sulfhydryl content. The foaming capacity and foaming stability showed highly significant negative correlations with disulfide bond content (p <= 0.01). We found wheat gluten protein (WGP) and mung bean protein (MBP) had higher foaming capacity (102.67 +/- 8.08 % and 89.33 +/- 4.72 %), which could be attributed to higher surface hydrophobicity (179.68 +/- 1.40 and 130.28 +/- 1.41) and larger contact angle (82.369 +/- 0.016 degrees and 82.949 +/- 0.228 degrees).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Foaming and air-water interfacial properties of camel milk proteins compared to bovine milk proteins
    Lajnaf, Roua
    Picart-Palmade, Laetitia
    Attia, Hamadi
    Marchesseau, Sylvie
    Ayadi, M. A.
    FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS, 2022, 126
  • [22] Emulsification Properties and Interfacial Behavior of Okra Proteins
    Karakasidis, Theodoros
    Kalogianni, Eleni P.
    Kontogiorgos, Vassilis
    Ritzoulis, Christos
    FOOD BIOPHYSICS, 2025, 20 (01)
  • [23] STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF A FEW PLANT PROTEINS
    Dattagupta, J.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2002, 58 : C98 - C98
  • [24] 'New views' on structure-function relationships in milk proteins
    Qi, PX
    Brown, EM
    Farrell, HM
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 12 (09) : 339 - 346
  • [25] Structure-function studies of eukaryotic copper transport proteins
    Aller, S
    Unger, VM
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 86 (01) : 260A - 260A
  • [26] Advanced Research on Structure-Function Relationships of Membrane Proteins
    Naito, Akira
    Kawamura, Izuru
    MEMBRANES, 2022, 12 (07)
  • [27] Structural Biology and Structure-Function Relationships of Membrane Proteins
    Moraes, Isabel
    Quigley, Andrew
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2021, 10 (03):
  • [28] Structure-function analysis of malaria proteins by gene targeting
    Ménard, R
    Nussenzweig, V
    PARASITOLOGY TODAY, 2000, 16 (06): : 222 - 224
  • [29] Structure-function relationships in sweet-tasting proteins
    Caldwell, J
    Markley, JL
    JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF PAKISTAN, 1999, 21 (03): : 268 - 280
  • [30] INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED PROTEINS: REVISITING THE STRUCTURE-FUNCTION PARADIGM
    Anurag, Meenakshi
    Singh, Gajinder Pal
    Dash, Debasis
    BIOMOLECULAR FORMS AND FUNCTIONS: A CELEBRATION OF 50 YEARS OF THE RAMACHANDRAN MAP, 2013, : 333 - 345