An extension to the procedure for developing uncertainty-consistent shear wave velocity profiles from inversion of experimental surface wave dispersion data

被引:0
|
作者
Vantassel, Joseph P. [1 ]
Cox, Brady R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Virginia Tech, 750 Drillfield Dr 200 Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Uncertainty; Surface waves; Garner valley; Borehole array; Vs; Site effects; VALLEY DOWNHOLE ARRAY; BAYESIAN INVERSION; SITE RESPONSE; ALGORITHM; BOREHOLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109329
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Measurements of shear wave velocity (Vs) with uncertainty are critical for site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard studies. However, rigorously quantifying the uncertainty in Vs over large enough areas and great enough depths remains challenging. In 2021, Vantassel and Cox (i.e., VC21) proposed a procedure for developing suites of Vs profiles from surface wave testing whose uncertainty were consistent with the experimental dispersion data's uncertainty. The VC21 procedure was a significant step forward, however, it requires a full dispersion data matrix to compute inter-wavelength phase velocity correlations. While applicable to many practical cases, VC21 could not be applied to the case where multiple surface wave arrays of different sizes were deployed at a site as a means of developing broadband dispersion data and deeper Vs profiles. In response, this work extends the VC21 procedure using two possible approaches for estimating a full dispersion data matrix. Approach 1 uses a selection of theoretical dispersion curves from an initial, traditional surface wave inversion. Approach 2 estimates the full data matrix by combining pieces of the data matrix obtained from the experimental dispersion measurements. Both approaches are evaluated using two synthetic datasets; one relatively-simple, three-layered model and one more-complex, five-layered model. Approach 1 and Approach 2 were able to reasonably estimate the true correlation matrix and recover uncertainty-consistent Vs profiles similar to the true distribution of Vs. While the uncertainty of the recovered Vs profiles were higher than is often assumed, the engineering proxies computed from those Vs profiles, namely the time averaged shear wave velocity in upper 30 m and the fundamental site period, showed substantially less uncertainty indicating the Vs profiles, while uncertain, are effective at capturing a site's engineering behavior. Both approaches were applied to real data from the Garner Valley Downhole Array (GVDA) site and found to yield better estimates of small-strain site amplification than achieved previously.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimation of seabed shear-wave velocity profiles using shear-wave source data
    Dong, Hefeng
    Thanh-Duong Nguyen
    Duffaut, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2013, 134 (01): : 176 - 184
  • [42] Characterizing uncertainty and variability in shear wave velocity profiles from the Italian seismic microzonation studies
    Mori, Federico
    Naso, Giuseppe
    Mendicelli, Amerigo
    Ciotoli, Giancarlo
    Varone, Chiara
    Moscatelli, Massimiliano
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2025, 350
  • [43] INVERSION OF SURFACE-WAVE DISPERSION DATA WITH RANDOM ERRORS
    KNOPOFF, L
    CHANG, FS
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEOPHYSIK, 1977, 43 (1-2): : 299 - 309
  • [44] Near surface S-wave velocity inversion based on cluster analysis of surface wave dispersion curve
    Song XinYue
    Liu GuoChang
    Du Jing
    Chi Lin
    Wang ZhiYong
    Shi LanTing
    Wang YiMeng
    Wang XingYu
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2023, 66 (07): : 3026 - 3047
  • [45] Shear wave velocity model beneath CBJI station West Java']Java, Indonesia from joint inversion of teleseismic receiver functions and surface wave dispersion
    Simanungkalit, R. H.
    Anggono, T.
    Syuhada
    Amran, A.
    Supriyanto
    3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON FRONTIER OF APPLIED PHYSICS (ISFAP 2017), 2018, 985
  • [46] SEABED SHEAR-WAVE VELOCITY ESTIMATION BY INTERFACE-WAVE DISPERSION USING DIFFERENT INVERSION METHODS
    Dong, Hefeng
    2013 MTS/IEEE OCEANS - BERGEN, 2013,
  • [47] Reply to comment on 'Shear wave profile from surface wave inversion: the impact of uncertainty on seismic site response analysis'
    Boaga, Jacopo
    Vignoli, Giulio
    Cassiani, Giorgio
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 9 (02) : 244 - 246
  • [48] Joint Inversion of Multimode Love Wave Dispersion Curves for Accurately Appraising of Shear Wave Velocity Reversal Profile
    Hamimu, La
    Nordin, M. Nawawi M.
    Safani, Jamhir
    PROGRESS OF PHYSICS RESEARCH IN MALAYSIA, PERFIK2009, 2010, 1250 : 245 - +
  • [49] Inversion of seismic surface wave data to resolve complex profiles
    Luke, Barbara
    Calderon-Macias, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 133 (02) : 155 - 165
  • [50] SWprocess: a workflow for developing robust estimates of surface wave dispersion uncertainty
    Joseph P. Vantassel
    Brady R. Cox
    Journal of Seismology, 2022, 26 : 731 - 756