An extension to the procedure for developing uncertainty-consistent shear wave velocity profiles from inversion of experimental surface wave dispersion data

被引:0
|
作者
Vantassel, Joseph P. [1 ]
Cox, Brady R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Virginia Tech, 750 Drillfield Dr 200 Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Uncertainty; Surface waves; Garner valley; Borehole array; Vs; Site effects; VALLEY DOWNHOLE ARRAY; BAYESIAN INVERSION; SITE RESPONSE; ALGORITHM; BOREHOLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109329
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Measurements of shear wave velocity (Vs) with uncertainty are critical for site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard studies. However, rigorously quantifying the uncertainty in Vs over large enough areas and great enough depths remains challenging. In 2021, Vantassel and Cox (i.e., VC21) proposed a procedure for developing suites of Vs profiles from surface wave testing whose uncertainty were consistent with the experimental dispersion data's uncertainty. The VC21 procedure was a significant step forward, however, it requires a full dispersion data matrix to compute inter-wavelength phase velocity correlations. While applicable to many practical cases, VC21 could not be applied to the case where multiple surface wave arrays of different sizes were deployed at a site as a means of developing broadband dispersion data and deeper Vs profiles. In response, this work extends the VC21 procedure using two possible approaches for estimating a full dispersion data matrix. Approach 1 uses a selection of theoretical dispersion curves from an initial, traditional surface wave inversion. Approach 2 estimates the full data matrix by combining pieces of the data matrix obtained from the experimental dispersion measurements. Both approaches are evaluated using two synthetic datasets; one relatively-simple, three-layered model and one more-complex, five-layered model. Approach 1 and Approach 2 were able to reasonably estimate the true correlation matrix and recover uncertainty-consistent Vs profiles similar to the true distribution of Vs. While the uncertainty of the recovered Vs profiles were higher than is often assumed, the engineering proxies computed from those Vs profiles, namely the time averaged shear wave velocity in upper 30 m and the fundamental site period, showed substantially less uncertainty indicating the Vs profiles, while uncertain, are effective at capturing a site's engineering behavior. Both approaches were applied to real data from the Garner Valley Downhole Array (GVDA) site and found to yield better estimates of small-strain site amplification than achieved previously.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mapping formation radial shear-wave velocity variation by a constrained inversion of borehole flexural-wave dispersion data
    Tang, Xiao-Ming
    Patterson, Douglas J.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2010, 75 (06) : E183 - E190
  • [32] Comparing shear-wave velocity profiles inverted from multichannel surface wave with borehole measurements
    Xia, JH
    Miller, RD
    Park, CB
    Hunter, JA
    Harris, JB
    Ivanov, J
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2002, 22 (03) : 181 - 190
  • [33] Direct estimation of shear-wave velocity profiles from surface wave investigation of geotechnical sites
    Lin, Shibin
    Ashlock, Jeramy
    Li, Bo
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2022, 72 (11): : 1016 - 1024
  • [34] Moho depth variation and shear wave velocity structure in northern Algeria from joint inversion of P-wave receiver functions and Rayleigh wave dispersion data
    Melouk, Billel
    Yelles-Chaouche, Abdelkrim
    Semmane, Fethi
    Jose Galiana-Merino, Juan
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 233 (02) : 1229 - 1244
  • [35] Scholte Wave Dispersion Modeling and Subsequent Application in Seabed Shear-Wave Velocity Profile Inversion
    Dong, Yang
    Piao, Shengchun
    Gong, Lijia
    Zheng, Guangxue
    Iqbal, Kashif
    Zhang, Shizhao
    Wang, Xiaohan
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [36] Surface Wave Tomography of the Arctic from Rayleigh and Love Wave Group Velocity Dispersion Data
    A. I. Seredkina
    Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 2019, 55 : 439 - 450
  • [37] Surface Wave Tomography of the Arctic from Rayleigh and Love Wave Group Velocity Dispersion Data
    Seredkina, A. I.
    IZVESTIYA-PHYSICS OF THE SOLID EARTH, 2019, 55 (03) : 439 - 450
  • [38] Near-surface shear-wave velocity estimation based on surface-wave inversion
    Li P.
    Zhang K.
    Zhang Y.
    Yan Z.
    Leading Edge, 2016, 35 (11): : 940 - 945
  • [39] DIRECT RECOVERY OF SHEAR-WAVE VELOCITY FROM SURFACE DATA
    CARRION, PM
    HASSANZADEH, S
    MCCOWAN, D
    GEOPHYSICS, 1985, 50 (02) : 351 - 351
  • [40] Shear velocity model for the Kyrgyz Tien Shan from joint inversion of receiver function and surface wave data
    Gilligan, Amy
    Roecker, Steven W.
    Priestley, Keith F.
    Nunn, Ceri
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 199 (01) : 480 - 498