Governing the Green Belt and Road Initiative: from a concept to institutional changes

被引:0
|
作者
Shen, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Yao [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Dev Studies, Resource Polit & Environm Change Cluster, Lib Rd, Brighton BN1 9RE, England
[2] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Int Inst Green Finance, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Green Belt and Road Initiative; neo-mercantilism; discursive institutionalism; institutional change; China; CHINA BELT; DISCURSIVE INSTITUTIONALISM; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; POWER; POLICY; NEOMERCANTILISM; MERCANTILISM; PERSPECTIVE; CAPITALISM; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1080/15387216.2025.2472661
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is at the threshold of a paradigm shift from a mercantilist approach to a comprehensive international development agenda. In this paper, we analyze the ideational roots of the "Green BRI" concept as one of the core elements of this strategic change. By applying a discursive institutionalist framework, we examine the impact of these ideological changes on China's domestic institutional framework governing the BRI. First, we provide a historical review of the mercantilist regime through decades of evolution of the Chinese international strategy, including the first decade of the BRI. We then examine the ideational mix around the "Green BRI" as part of the so-called BRI 2.0 discourse. We identified three embedded policy ideas: 1) to engage with the global governance system and development agenda; 2) to share Chinese development experience with the Global South, and 3) to address previous deficiencies manifested in the previous mercantilist era. These underpinning policy ideas are driving gradual but observable institutional changes within China, as new policy coalitions are emerging outside of the existing mercantilist regime, pressing the incumbents to consider more eco-friendly norms or practices. However, achieving a successful Green BRI requires profound institutional reforms. We also find that reducing the environmental footprints of Chinese overseas infrastructure projects can be challenging due to the persistent mercantilist beliefs and institutions, whereas promoting green industrial investments overseas can be relatively expedient given China's dominant technology and commercial capacities in the areas of renewable energy and electric vehicles.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sustainable Arbitration Along the Belt and Road Initiative: The Green Model Clause
    Zhang, Yuying
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, 2024, 41 (02): : 179 - 206
  • [42] Towards green economy: Environmental performance of belt and road initiative in China
    Yao Hu
    Yueyue Li
    Jun Sun
    Yun Zhu
    Jinzhe Chai
    Bei Liu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 9496 - 9513
  • [43] Does the Belt and Road Initiative Promote Green Innovation Quality? Evidence from Chinese Cities
    Xin, Peizhu
    Zhao, Min
    Bai, Yang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [44] Regions in the Belt and Road Initiative
    Forbes, Vivian Louis
    JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN OCEAN REGION, 2020, 16 (03) : 371 - 373
  • [45] Interpreting the Belt and Road Initiative
    Orozco Plascencia, Jose Manuel
    PORTES-REVISTA MEXICANA DE ESTUDIOS SOBRE LA CUENCA DEL PACIFICO, 2022, 16 (32): : 167 - 171
  • [46] Reflections on the Belt and Road Initiative
    Yu Hong
    CHINA-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (04) : 8 - 23
  • [47] The Belt and Road Initiative at the Crossroads
    Upreti, Pratyush Nath
    GLOBAL TRADE AND CUSTOMS JOURNAL, 2019, 14 (05): : 200 - 202
  • [48] The Belt and Road Initiative and Globalization
    Ke Yinbin
    Yang Le
    InternationalUnderstanding, 2018, (01) : 18 - 20
  • [49] Financing the Belt and Road Initiative
    Liu, Weidong
    Zhang, Yajing
    Xiong, Wei
    EURASIAN GEOGRAPHY AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 61 (02) : 137 - 145
  • [50] A Corpus-Based Analysis of Discourses on the Belt and Road Initiative Corpora and the Belt and Road Initiative
    Wu, Baoqin
    DISCOURSE & COMMUNICATION, 2024, 18 (03) : 485 - 488