Governing the Green Belt and Road Initiative: from a concept to institutional changes

被引:0
|
作者
Shen, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Yao [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Dev Studies, Resource Polit & Environm Change Cluster, Lib Rd, Brighton BN1 9RE, England
[2] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Int Inst Green Finance, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Green Belt and Road Initiative; neo-mercantilism; discursive institutionalism; institutional change; China; CHINA BELT; DISCURSIVE INSTITUTIONALISM; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; POWER; POLICY; NEOMERCANTILISM; MERCANTILISM; PERSPECTIVE; CAPITALISM; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1080/15387216.2025.2472661
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is at the threshold of a paradigm shift from a mercantilist approach to a comprehensive international development agenda. In this paper, we analyze the ideational roots of the "Green BRI" concept as one of the core elements of this strategic change. By applying a discursive institutionalist framework, we examine the impact of these ideological changes on China's domestic institutional framework governing the BRI. First, we provide a historical review of the mercantilist regime through decades of evolution of the Chinese international strategy, including the first decade of the BRI. We then examine the ideational mix around the "Green BRI" as part of the so-called BRI 2.0 discourse. We identified three embedded policy ideas: 1) to engage with the global governance system and development agenda; 2) to share Chinese development experience with the Global South, and 3) to address previous deficiencies manifested in the previous mercantilist era. These underpinning policy ideas are driving gradual but observable institutional changes within China, as new policy coalitions are emerging outside of the existing mercantilist regime, pressing the incumbents to consider more eco-friendly norms or practices. However, achieving a successful Green BRI requires profound institutional reforms. We also find that reducing the environmental footprints of Chinese overseas infrastructure projects can be challenging due to the persistent mercantilist beliefs and institutions, whereas promoting green industrial investments overseas can be relatively expedient given China's dominant technology and commercial capacities in the areas of renewable energy and electric vehicles.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Impact of the Belt and Road initiative on enterprise green transformation
    Wang, Lan
    Cheng, Zhonghua
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 468
  • [12] The Belt and Road Initiative Is Conducive to Global Green Recovery
    Lily Wang
    China's Foreign Trade, 2021, (03) : 33 - 34
  • [13] The Green Incentives and Green Bonds Financing under the Belt and Road Initiative
    Jian, Jianhui
    Fan, Xiaojie
    Zhao, Shiyong
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2022, 58 (05) : 1430 - 1440
  • [14] China as a "Green Soft Power" and the Belt and Road Initiative: Evidence From Pakistan
    Nitza-Makowska, Agnieszka
    POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2025, 13
  • [15] The Belt and Road Initiative and the Concept of an Economic Corridor along the Southern Silk Road
    Lin Wenxun
    Wu Lingwei
    ContemporarySocialSciences, 2017, (04) : 24 - 33
  • [16] Theorizing the construction of the Belt and Road Initiative: Based on institutional and cultural perspectives
    Liu W.
    Yao Q.
    Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75 (06): : 1134 - 1146
  • [17] Leveraging the Belt and Road Initiative for Green Investments: The Case of Bangladesh
    Ahmad, Zaker
    Hoque, Sanjana
    LAW AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2024, 17 (01) : 47 - 91
  • [18] ON BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE
    Rumyantsev, E. N.
    70 LYET SOVRYEMYENNOMOO KITAYSKOMOO GOSOODARSTVOO, 2019, : 209 - +
  • [20] The Transition of Belt and Road Initiative from 1.0 to 2.0: Challenges and Implications of Green Development
    Wang, Rui
    Lee, Khai Ern
    Mokhtar, Mazlin
    Goh, Thian Lai
    FUDAN JOURNAL OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2023, 16 (03) : 293 - 328