Cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors for second-line HR+/HER2− advanced or metastatic breast cancer in China

被引:0
|
作者
Caifeng Jia [1 ]
Sen Zhang [2 ]
Jie Wang [3 ]
Bing Feng [4 ]
Fenghao Shi [5 ]
Meiqi Wang [6 ]
Sainan Li [7 ]
Hao Xu [7 ]
Mingxia Wang [8 ]
机构
[1] The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Clinical Pharmacology
[2] The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Pharmacy
[3] Hebei Medical University,Department of Pharmacy
[4] The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Clinical Pharmacy
[5] Peking University,International Research Center for Medicinal Administration
[6] Peking University,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences
[7] The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Breast Center
[8] The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Medical Insurance
关键词
CDK4/6 inhibitors; Fulvestrant; Cost-effectiveness; HR-positive/HER2-negative; Breast cancer; China;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-025-97504-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hormone receptor HR-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) breast cancer is the most common subtype in China, representing 60–70% of cases, with a rising incidence due to aging demographics and lifestyle changes. CDK4/6 inhibitors such as palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have been proven effective in treating HR+/HER2 − advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC), though they may increase healthcare costs. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors for the second-line treatment of HR+/HER2 − ABC/MBC from the Chinese healthcare perspective. A cohort-based partitioned survival model was utilized, drawing on the survival data published from PALOMA-3, MONALEESA-3 and MONARCH-2 trials. Costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a 15-year time horizon. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model results. In the base-case analysis, the model estimated health benefits to be 2.10 QALYs for palbociclib plus fulvestrant (PAL + FUL), 2.55 QALYs for ribociclib plus fulvestrant (RIB + FUL), and 2.60 QALYs for abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (ABE + FUL), with corresponding costs of $34,423, $41,119, and $48,019. Compared with PAL + FUL, the ICERs were $27,161 per QALY for ABE + FUL and $15,073 per QALY for RIB + FUL. The robustness of these findings was confirmed through uncertainty analyses. Among the three strategies, the most cost-effective probabilities of PAL + FUL, RIB + FUL and ABE + FUL were 0%, 99.8%, and 0.2% under the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 3 times per-capita gross domestic product ($37,738) in China. This study indicated that both RIB + FUL and ABE + FUL are cost-effective at the WTP threshold compared with PAL + FUL. Notably, RIB + FUL offers the greatest cost-effective advantage for the second-line treatment of HR+/HER2 − ABC/MBC among these three CDK4/6 inhibitors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adding Palbociclib as a Second-Line Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer From the US and Chinese Perspectives
    Zhang, Yingjie
    Zeng, Xiaohui
    Deng, Haijun
    Ma, Fang
    Peng, Ye
    Yi, Lidan
    Tan, Chongqing
    Peng, Liubao
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 41 (06) : 1175 - 1185
  • [42] Real-World Experience with CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the First-Line Palliative Setting for HR+/HER2-Advanced Breast Cancer
    Patel, Ram
    Mathews, John
    Hamm, Caroline
    Kulkarni, Swati
    Gupta, Rasna
    Opperman, Tarquin
    Chiong, John Dean
    Nasser, Abdullah
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2025, 32 (01)
  • [43] Real-world experience with CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first-line palliative setting for HR+/HER2-advanced breast cancer
    Patel, Ram
    Nasser, Abdullah
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [44] Advancing treatment choices: CDK4/6 inhibitor switching in HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer
    Zagami, Paola
    Esposito, Angela
    Salimbeni, Beatrice Taurelli
    Giachetti, Pier Paolo Maria Berton
    Scafetta, Roberta
    Lambertini, Matteo
    Di Maio, Massimo
    Curigliano, Giuseppe
    Criscitiello, Carmen
    Cinieri, Saverio
    BREAST, 2025, 79
  • [45] Clinical effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer
    Zhang, Frank
    Mesias, Jesus Anampa
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (09)
  • [46] Patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a real-world study in Italy
    Perrone, Valentina
    Dovizio, Melania
    Leogrande, Melania
    Tamma, Antonella
    Giovannitti, Massimo
    Buzzoni, Carlotta
    Esposti, Luca Degli
    BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [47] Composite biomarkers for the prediction of progression-free survival with CDK4/6 inhibitors in metastatic HR+/HER2-breast cancer
    Witkiewicz, Agnieszka
    Wang, Jianxin
    Knudsen, Erik
    Levine, Ellis
    O'Connor, Tracey
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (09)
  • [48] Social Determinants of Health and Other Predictors in Initiation of Treatment with CDK4/6 Inhibitors for HR+/HER2-Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Goyal, Ravi K.
    Candrilli, Sean D.
    Abughosh, Susan
    Chen, Hua
    Holmes, Holly M.
    Johnson, Michael L.
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (12)
  • [49] Therapy of advanced HR+, HER2-Breast Cancer Live professionally longer with CDK4/6 Inhibitor
    Ruedesheim, Sabine M.
    BREAST CARE, 2021, 16 (03)
  • [50] Evaluate the impact of HER2 status on the response to CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer
    Goncalves, M. Veloso
    Teixeira, C.
    Valente, A. C.
    Reis, J.
    Teixeira, N.
    Sousa, I.
    Almeida, D.
    Augusto, I.
    Barbosa, M.
    Meireles, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 200 : 55 - 55