Cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors for second-line HR+/HER2− advanced or metastatic breast cancer in China

被引:0
|
作者
Caifeng Jia [1 ]
Sen Zhang [2 ]
Jie Wang [3 ]
Bing Feng [4 ]
Fenghao Shi [5 ]
Meiqi Wang [6 ]
Sainan Li [7 ]
Hao Xu [7 ]
Mingxia Wang [8 ]
机构
[1] The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Clinical Pharmacology
[2] The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Pharmacy
[3] Hebei Medical University,Department of Pharmacy
[4] The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Clinical Pharmacy
[5] Peking University,International Research Center for Medicinal Administration
[6] Peking University,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences
[7] The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Breast Center
[8] The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Medical Insurance
关键词
CDK4/6 inhibitors; Fulvestrant; Cost-effectiveness; HR-positive/HER2-negative; Breast cancer; China;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-025-97504-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hormone receptor HR-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) breast cancer is the most common subtype in China, representing 60–70% of cases, with a rising incidence due to aging demographics and lifestyle changes. CDK4/6 inhibitors such as palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have been proven effective in treating HR+/HER2 − advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC), though they may increase healthcare costs. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors for the second-line treatment of HR+/HER2 − ABC/MBC from the Chinese healthcare perspective. A cohort-based partitioned survival model was utilized, drawing on the survival data published from PALOMA-3, MONALEESA-3 and MONARCH-2 trials. Costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a 15-year time horizon. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model results. In the base-case analysis, the model estimated health benefits to be 2.10 QALYs for palbociclib plus fulvestrant (PAL + FUL), 2.55 QALYs for ribociclib plus fulvestrant (RIB + FUL), and 2.60 QALYs for abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (ABE + FUL), with corresponding costs of $34,423, $41,119, and $48,019. Compared with PAL + FUL, the ICERs were $27,161 per QALY for ABE + FUL and $15,073 per QALY for RIB + FUL. The robustness of these findings was confirmed through uncertainty analyses. Among the three strategies, the most cost-effective probabilities of PAL + FUL, RIB + FUL and ABE + FUL were 0%, 99.8%, and 0.2% under the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 3 times per-capita gross domestic product ($37,738) in China. This study indicated that both RIB + FUL and ABE + FUL are cost-effective at the WTP threshold compared with PAL + FUL. Notably, RIB + FUL offers the greatest cost-effective advantage for the second-line treatment of HR+/HER2 − ABC/MBC among these three CDK4/6 inhibitors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Metastatic HR+/HER2-Breast Cancer: Clinico-Pathological Analysis for Determinants of Response
    Maruthi, Vijaya Kadam
    Schultz, Emily
    Knudsen, Erik
    Witkiewicz, Agnieszka
    Hamilton, Deanna
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2022, 102 (SUPPL 1) : 136 - 138
  • [32] How to Treat HR+/HER2-Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients after CDK4/6 Inhibitors: An Unfinished Story
    Cogliati, Viola
    Capici, Serena
    Pepe, Francesca Fulvia
    di Mauro, Pierluigi
    Riva, Francesca
    Cicchiello, Federica
    Maggioni, Claudia
    Cordani, Nicoletta
    Cerrito, Maria Grazia
    Cazzaniga, Marina Elena
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [33] Real-World Experience with CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Metastatic HR+/HER2-Breast Cancer at a Single Cancer Center
    Knudsen, Erik S.
    Schultz, Emily
    Hamilton, Deanna
    Attwood, Kris
    Edge, Stephen
    O'Connor, Tracey
    Levine, Ellis
    Witkiewicz, Agnieszka K.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2022, 27 (08): : 646 - 654
  • [34] Predicting CDK4/6 inhibitors outcomes in pts with HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer: A machine learning approach
    Moiso, Enrico
    Ferraro, Emanuela
    Cabel, Luc
    Safonov, Anton
    Ahmed, Mehnaj
    An, Julia Ah-Reum
    Jhaveri, Komal L.
    Norton, Larry
    Robson, Mark E.
    Modi, Shanu
    Chandarlapaty, Sarat
    Razavi, Pedram
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [35] First-line CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment for HR+, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC)
    Hoskins, Kent F.
    Richards, Paul
    Wisinski, Kari
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (13)
  • [36] TREATMENT PATTERNS FOLLOWING FIRST LINE CDK4/6 INHIBITOR PROGRESSION IN HR+, HER2-METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
    Behan, E.
    Bansal, A.
    Veenstra, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S406 - S406
  • [37] Real-world experience with CDK4/6 inhibitors for metastatic HR+/HER2-breast cancer at a single cancer center
    Milovic-Kovacevic, M.
    Bobic, S.
    Karaferic, A.
    Pavlovic, L.
    Matovic, M.
    Poparic-Bandjur, B.
    BREAST, 2023, 68 : S115 - S115
  • [38] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CDK4/6 INHIBITORS (CDK4/6I) IN FIRST- VS SECOND-LINE FOR ADVANCED BREAST CANCER IN THE PHASE 3 SONIA TRIAL (BOOG 2017-03)
    Kent, S.
    Wortelboor, N.
    Konings, I. R.
    van Ommen-Nijhof, A.
    van der Noort, V
    van den Pol, E.
    Paez, C. Guerrero
    van Bekkum, M. L.
    Droogendijk, H.
    Erdkamp, F.
    Houtsma, D.
    Oosterkamp, H. M.
    van der Padt-pruijsten, A.
    Siemerink, E. J. M.
    Tol, J.
    van Zweeden, A. A.
    van Leeuwen-stok, E.
    Sonke, G. S.
    Jager, A.
    Blommestein, H. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (12)
  • [39] HR+, HER2-Advanced Breast Cancer and CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Mode of Action, Clinical Activity, and Safety Profiles
    Sammons, Sarah L.
    Topping, Donna L.
    Blackwell, Kimberly L.
    CURRENT CANCER DRUG TARGETS, 2017, 17 (07) : 637 - 649
  • [40] CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2-advanced/metastatic breast cancer: a systematic literature review of real-world evidence studies
    Harbeck, Nadia
    Bartlett, Meaghan
    Spurden, Dean
    Hooper, Becky
    Zhan, Lin
    Rosta, Emily
    Cameron, Chris
    Mitra, Debanjali
    Zhou, Anna
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 (16) : 2107 - 2122