Cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors for second-line HR+/HER2− advanced or metastatic breast cancer in China

被引:0
|
作者
Caifeng Jia [1 ]
Sen Zhang [2 ]
Jie Wang [3 ]
Bing Feng [4 ]
Fenghao Shi [5 ]
Meiqi Wang [6 ]
Sainan Li [7 ]
Hao Xu [7 ]
Mingxia Wang [8 ]
机构
[1] The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Clinical Pharmacology
[2] The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Pharmacy
[3] Hebei Medical University,Department of Pharmacy
[4] The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Clinical Pharmacy
[5] Peking University,International Research Center for Medicinal Administration
[6] Peking University,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences
[7] The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Breast Center
[8] The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Department of Medical Insurance
关键词
CDK4/6 inhibitors; Fulvestrant; Cost-effectiveness; HR-positive/HER2-negative; Breast cancer; China;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-025-97504-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hormone receptor HR-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) breast cancer is the most common subtype in China, representing 60–70% of cases, with a rising incidence due to aging demographics and lifestyle changes. CDK4/6 inhibitors such as palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have been proven effective in treating HR+/HER2 − advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC), though they may increase healthcare costs. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors for the second-line treatment of HR+/HER2 − ABC/MBC from the Chinese healthcare perspective. A cohort-based partitioned survival model was utilized, drawing on the survival data published from PALOMA-3, MONALEESA-3 and MONARCH-2 trials. Costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a 15-year time horizon. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model results. In the base-case analysis, the model estimated health benefits to be 2.10 QALYs for palbociclib plus fulvestrant (PAL + FUL), 2.55 QALYs for ribociclib plus fulvestrant (RIB + FUL), and 2.60 QALYs for abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (ABE + FUL), with corresponding costs of $34,423, $41,119, and $48,019. Compared with PAL + FUL, the ICERs were $27,161 per QALY for ABE + FUL and $15,073 per QALY for RIB + FUL. The robustness of these findings was confirmed through uncertainty analyses. Among the three strategies, the most cost-effective probabilities of PAL + FUL, RIB + FUL and ABE + FUL were 0%, 99.8%, and 0.2% under the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 3 times per-capita gross domestic product ($37,738) in China. This study indicated that both RIB + FUL and ABE + FUL are cost-effective at the WTP threshold compared with PAL + FUL. Notably, RIB + FUL offers the greatest cost-effective advantage for the second-line treatment of HR+/HER2 − ABC/MBC among these three CDK4/6 inhibitors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost Effectiveness of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women in the USA
    Prajakta P. Masurkar
    Haluk Damgacioglu
    Ashish A. Deshmukh
    Meghana V. Trivedi
    PharmacoEconomics, 2023, 41 : 709 - 718
  • [2] Study Supports Delay of CDK4/6 Inhibitors Until Second-Line Treatment in Advanced HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer
    Rugo, Hope S.
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2023, 21 (07) : 352 - 353
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first-line treatment of HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women in Panama
    Castillo-Fernandez, Omar O.
    Lim, Maria
    Montano, Lilian
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (05)
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Masurkar, Prajakta P.
    Prajapati, Prachi
    Canedo, Joanne
    Goswami, Swarnali
    Earl, Sally
    Bhattacharya, Kaustuv
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2024, 40 (10) : 1753 - 1767
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to standard endocrine therapy in first-line treatment of women with advanced HR+/HER2− breast cancer in Mexico
    Mariana Molina-Jaimes
    Antonio Galindo-González
    Haydeé Cristina Verduzco-Aguirre
    Sergio Bautista-Arredondo
    Gustavo Reyes-Terán
    Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2024, 26 : 239 - 244
  • [7] Approaching Use of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Metastatic HR+, HER2-Breast Cancer
    Weiss, Jennifer
    Afghahi, Anosheh
    Shagisultanova, Elena
    Diamond, Jennifer R.
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2018, 32 (10): : 513 - 515
  • [8] Cost Effectiveness of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of HR+/HER2-Metastatic Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women in the USA
    Masurkar, Prajakta P.
    Damgacioglu, Haluk
    Deshmukh, Ashish A.
    Trivedi, Meghana V.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2023, 41 (06) : 709 - 718
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first-line treatment of HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women in the United States.
    Masurkar, Prajakta P.
    Damgacioglu, Haluk
    Deshmukh, Ashish
    Trivedi, Meghana
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 81 (13)
  • [10] Unveiling the cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in treating patients with HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer: A closer look at nonmedication expenses
    Pilehvari, Asal
    You, Wen
    Kimmick, Gretchen Genevieve
    Bonilla, Gloribel
    Anderson, Roger
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)