Ultimate ownership, corporate social responsibility and firm value: evidence from China

被引:0
|
作者
Su, Kun [1 ]
Fu, Senliulu [1 ]
Meng, Yuan [2 ]
Wan, Rui [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Management, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] PICC, Dept Financial Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Canada West, Dept ACSS, Vancouver, BC, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Agency problem; China; Corporate social responsibility; Firm value; Ultimate ownership; PERFORMANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNMENT; RISK; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1108/CMS-12-2023-0719
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis paper aims to investigate the relationship among ultimate ownership, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and firm value using firm-level data from Chinese listed companies.Design/methodology/approachUsing a panel data of Chinese listed firms during 2010-2018, this paper estimates with correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis.FindingsThe larger the divergence between ultimate owner's control rights and cash flow rights, the stronger motivation is to infringe corporate interests and cover up misconduct through CSR. While the larger the cash flow rights, the more conducive to restrain the ultimate owner from CSR investment. The state-owned enterprises have a higher CSR. Furthermore, the separation of control rights and cash flow rights is significantly negatively related to firm value, whereas cash flow rights positively affect it. State-owned ultimate owner has a negative impact on firm value. CSR plays a significant mediating effect between ultimate ownership and firm value.Originality/valueThis paper reveals the tunneling and disguising effect of CSR and provides a new approach for the affecting mechanisms between ultimate ownership and firm value.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value: Evidence from Korea
    Kim, Woo Sung
    Park, Kunsu
    Lee, Sang Hoon
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (07)
  • [2] Analyst coverage, corporate social responsibility, and firm value: Evidence from China
    Hu, May
    Xiong, Wanfang
    Xu, Cheng
    GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2021, 50
  • [3] Relationships Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Value, and Institutional Ownership: Evidence from Indonesia
    Hermeindito, Hermeindito
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2022, 9 (05): : 365 - 376
  • [4] Firm performance, corporate ownership, and corporate social responsibility disclosure in China
    Li, Qi
    Luo, Wei
    Wang, Yaping
    Wu, Liansheng
    BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2013, 22 (02) : 159 - 173
  • [5] Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership
    Buchanan, Bonnie
    Cao, Cathy Xuying
    Chen, Chongyang
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2018, 52 : 73 - 95
  • [6] Foreign Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China
    Guo, Mingyuan
    Zheng, Chendi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (02) : 1 - 22
  • [7] Institutional Ownership and Value Relevance of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from China
    Rehman, Ramiz Ur
    Riaz, Zahid
    Cullinan, Charles
    Zhang, Junrui
    Wang, Fanghua
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [8] Ultimate ownership, risk-taking and firm value: evidence from China
    Su, Kun
    Li, Liuchuang
    Wan, Rui
    ASIA PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW, 2017, 23 (01) : 10 - 26
  • [9] Corporate Social Responsibility, Profitability and Firm Value: Evidence from Indonesia
    Machmuddah, Zaky
    Sari, Dian Wulan
    Utomo, St Dwiarso
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2020, 7 (09): : 631 - 638
  • [10] Corporate social responsibility reporting and firm performance: evidence from China
    Cheng S.
    Lin K.Z.
    Wong W.
    Journal of Management & Governance, 2016, 20 (3) : 503 - 523