Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership

被引:311
|
作者
Buchanan, Bonnie [1 ,3 ]
Cao, Cathy Xuying [1 ]
Chen, Chongyang [2 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Univ, Albers Sch Business & Econ, Dept Finance, 901 12th Ave,POB 222000, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
[2] Pacific Lutheran Univ, Sch Business, Dept Finance, Parkland, WA 98447 USA
[3] HAnken Sch Econ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; ESG; Firm value; Corporate governance; Financial crisis; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; IMPACT; INVESTORS; INVESTMENT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.07.004
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine how Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), jointly with influential institutional ownership (IO), affects firm value around the 2008 global financial crisis. We find that the effect of CSR on firm value varies with the level of influential institutional ownership and depends upon economic conditions. Using difference-in-difference methods, we show that compared with non-CSR firms, CSR firms have higher firm values before the financial crisis but experience more loss in firm value during the crisis. Our findings suggest that the overall CSR effect depends on the relative dominance of two effects: conflict-resolution and overinvestment effect. In addition, we apply triple difference analysis and show that the relation between CSR and firm value depends upon the level of influential institutional ownership. Specifically, before the crisis, CSR positively affects the value of low institutional ownership firms and the effect is significantly weaker for firms with higher influential IO. During the crisis, the CSR-firm value relation is positive for high institutional ownership firms, suggesting that overinvestment concerns dominate when the crisis occurs. However, such a positive IO effect is not significant for CSR firms with high rollover risks. Our results are supported by a series of robustness tests.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 95
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Relationships Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Value, and Institutional Ownership: Evidence from Indonesia
    Hermeindito, Hermeindito
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2022, 9 (05): : 365 - 376
  • [2] Institutional ownership horizon, corporate social responsibility and shareholder value
    Erhemjamts, Otgontsetseg
    Huang, Kershen
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 105 : 61 - 79
  • [3] Common institutional ownership and corporate social responsibility
    Cheng, Xin
    Wang, He
    Wang, Xianjue
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2022, 136
  • [4] Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value: Evidence from Korea
    Kim, Woo Sung
    Park, Kunsu
    Lee, Sang Hoon
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (07)
  • [5] Ultimate ownership, corporate social responsibility and firm value: evidence from China
    Su, Kun
    Fu, Senliulu
    Meng, Yuan
    Wan, Rui
    CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2025,
  • [6] Firm performance, corporate ownership, and corporate social responsibility disclosure in China
    Li, Qi
    Luo, Wei
    Wang, Yaping
    Wu, Liansheng
    BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2013, 22 (02) : 159 - 173
  • [7] Family ownership and corporate social responsibility: the moderating effect of institutional ownership
    Bouzgarrou, Houssam
    Houcine, Majdi
    Ftiti, Zied
    Louhichi, Wael
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2022, 42 (02): : 1135 - 1152
  • [8] Corporate social responsibility, competition, and firm value
    Gupta, Kartick
    Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2021, 68
  • [9] Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value Protection
    Ogachi, Daniel
    Zoltan, Zeman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2020, 8 (04): : 1 - 22
  • [10] Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility
    Jo, Hoje
    Harjoto, Maretno A.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 103 (03) : 351 - 383