Ultimate ownership, corporate social responsibility and firm value: evidence from China

被引:0
|
作者
Su, Kun [1 ]
Fu, Senliulu [1 ]
Meng, Yuan [2 ]
Wan, Rui [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Management, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] PICC, Dept Financial Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Canada West, Dept ACSS, Vancouver, BC, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Agency problem; China; Corporate social responsibility; Firm value; Ultimate ownership; PERFORMANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNMENT; RISK; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1108/CMS-12-2023-0719
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis paper aims to investigate the relationship among ultimate ownership, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and firm value using firm-level data from Chinese listed companies.Design/methodology/approachUsing a panel data of Chinese listed firms during 2010-2018, this paper estimates with correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis.FindingsThe larger the divergence between ultimate owner's control rights and cash flow rights, the stronger motivation is to infringe corporate interests and cover up misconduct through CSR. While the larger the cash flow rights, the more conducive to restrain the ultimate owner from CSR investment. The state-owned enterprises have a higher CSR. Furthermore, the separation of control rights and cash flow rights is significantly negatively related to firm value, whereas cash flow rights positively affect it. State-owned ultimate owner has a negative impact on firm value. CSR plays a significant mediating effect between ultimate ownership and firm value.Originality/valueThis paper reveals the tunneling and disguising effect of CSR and provides a new approach for the affecting mechanisms between ultimate ownership and firm value.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Opportunity costs and the value of corporate social responsibility: evidence from firm dividend policy
    Krieger, Kevin
    Mauck, Nathan
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 31 (18) : 1845 - 1850
  • [22] Corporate social responsibility and firm value: evidence from Chinese targeted poverty alleviation
    Huang, Heshu
    Shang, Ruotong
    Wang, Liukai
    Gong, Yu
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2022, 60 (12) : 3255 - 3274
  • [23] Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Value and Corporate Governance Code Revisions: The Asian Evidence*
    Ooi, Chai-Aun
    Hooy, Chee-Wooi
    Nagata, Kyoko
    ASIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2021, 35 (01) : 27 - 56
  • [24] Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Firm Investment Efficiency: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market
    Alobaid, Rayed Obaid Hammoud
    Qasem, Ameen
    Al-Qadasi, Adel Ali
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (15)
  • [25] The impact of market orientation and corporate social responsibility on firm performance Evidence from China
    Qu, Riliang
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2009, 21 (04) : 570 - 582
  • [26] Inter-Firm Executive Mobility and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence From China
    Wang, Jun
    Cao, Jieling
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [27] Corporate Social Responsibility and Ownership Interrelation: Evidence from Estonia
    Glushkova, Irina
    Gurvits-Suits, Natalie Aleksandra
    EUROPEAN INTEGRATION STUDIES, 2019, (13) : 100 - 107
  • [28] Corporate social responsibility, competition, and firm value
    Gupta, Kartick
    Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2021, 68
  • [29] Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value Protection
    Ogachi, Daniel
    Zoltan, Zeman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2020, 8 (04): : 1 - 22
  • [30] Ultimate Ownership, Corporate Diversification, and Cash Dividends: Evidence from China
    Yang, Xingquan
    Li, Wencong
    Fu, Yumei
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2021, 57 (13) : 3878 - 3890