Advancing Sustainable Energy: Environmental and Economic Assessment of Plastic Waste Gasification for Syngas and Electricity Generation Using Life Cycle Modeling

被引:0
|
作者
Javed, Muhammad Hassan [1 ]
Ahmad, Anees [1 ]
Rehan, Mohammad [2 ]
Musharavati, Farayi [3 ]
Nizami, Abdul-Sattar [1 ,4 ]
Khan, Mohammad Ilyas [5 ]
机构
[1] Govt Coll Univ, Sustainable Dev Study Ctr, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
[2] King Abdulaziz Univ, Ctr Excellence Environm Studies CEES, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[3] Qatar Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Doha, Qatar
[4] Korea Univ, Grad Sch Energy & Environm, Seoul 02481, South Korea
[5] King Khalid Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
关键词
gasification; life cycle assessment; plastic waste; sustainability; synthetic gas; TO-ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.3390/su17031277
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The explosion of plastic waste generation, approaching 400 million tons per year, has created a worldwide environmental crisis that conventional waste management systems cannot handle. This problem can be solved through gasification, which converts nonrecyclable plastics to syngas with potential applications in electricity generation and synthetic fuel production. This study investigates whether syngas production from plastic waste by gasification is environmentally and economically feasible. Environmental impacts were assessed through a life cycle assessment framework using a life cycle impact assessment approach, ReCiPe 2016, with 10 midpoint/endpoint categories. Midpoint results of the baseline scenario with grid-mix electricity revealed climate change (GWP) of 775 kg CO2 equivalent and fossil depletion potential (FDP) of 311 kg oil equivalent per ton of plastic waste. Meanwhile, a solar scenario showed GWP as 435 kg CO2 equivalent and FDP as 166 kg oil equivalent per ton of plastic waste. Switching to solar energy cut GWP 44% and FDP 47%, respectively. However, the tradeoffs were higher human toxicity potential (HTP) and marine ecotoxicity potential (METP) due to upstream material extraction of renewable systems, respectively. Among environmental performance drivers, electricity inputs and operating materials were identified through sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Syngas production from a plant of 50 tons per day can yield electricity sales revenue of USD 4.79 million, excluding USD 4.05 million in operational expenditures. Financial indicators like a 2.06-year payback period, USD 5.32 million net present value over a 20-year project life, and 38.2% internal rate of return indicate the profitability of the system. An external cost analysis showed emissions-related costs of USD 26.43 per ton of plastic waste processed, dominated by CO2 and NOx emissions. Despite these costs, the avoided impacts of less landfilling/incineration and electricity generation support gasification. Gasification should be promoted as a subsidy and incentive by policymakers for wider adoption and integration into municipal waste management systems. Findings show it can be adapted to global sustainability goals and circular economy principles while delivering strong economic returns. The study findings also contribute to several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), for instance, SDG 7 by promoting clean energy technologies, SDG 12 by implementing circular economy, and SDG 13 by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle thinking of plasma gasification as a waste-to-energy tool: Review on environmental, economic and social aspects
    Ramos, Ana
    Rouboa, Abel
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 153
  • [22] Gasification of medical plastic waste into hydrogen: Energy potential, environmental benefits and economic feasibility
    Cudjoe, Dan
    Zhu, Bangzhu
    FUEL, 2024, 371
  • [23] Economic and environmental assessment of electricity generation using biogas and heat energy from municipal solid waste: A case study of Lesotho
    Sechoala, Tsepo
    Popoola, Olawale
    Ayodele, Temitope
    AIMS ENERGY, 2023, 11 (02) : 337 - 357
  • [24] Life cycle assessment of agricultural waste recycling for sustainable environmental impact
    Sumiyati, S.
    Samadikun, B. P.
    Widiyanti, A.
    Budihardjo, M. A.
    Al Qadar, S.
    Puspita, A. S.
    GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT-GJESM, 2024, 10 (02): : 907 - 938
  • [25] Environmental and exergetic life cycle assessment of incineration- and gasification-based waste to energy systems in China
    Tang, Yuanjun
    Dong, Jun
    Li, Guoneng
    Zheng, Youqu
    Chi, Yong
    Nzihou, Ange
    Weiss-Hortala, Elsa
    Ye, Chao
    ENERGY, 2020, 205 (205)
  • [26] Assessing the Environmental Impact of Municipal Waste on Energy Incineration Technology for Power Generation Using Life Cycle Assessment Methodology
    Luo, Yiting
    Ye, Mingqiang
    Zhou, Yihui
    Su, Rongkui
    Huang, Shunhong
    Wang, Hangqing
    Dai, Xiangrong
    TOXICS, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [27] Advancing Biodiesel Production System from Mixed Vegetable Oil Waste: A Life Cycle Assessment of Environmental and Economic Outcomes
    Musharavati, Farayi
    Sajid, Khadija
    Anwer, Izza
    Nizami, Abdul-Sattar
    Javed, Muhammad Hassan
    Ahmad, Anees
    Naqvi, Muhammad
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [28] Life-cycle environmental and economic assessment of medical waste treatment
    Hong, Jingmin
    Zhan, Song
    Yu, Zhaohe
    Hong, Jinglan
    Qi, Congcong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 174 : 65 - 73
  • [29] Assessment of energy recovery potential and analysis of environmental impacts of waste to energy options using life cycle assessment
    Kumar, Atul
    Samadder, Sukha Ranjan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 365
  • [30] Advancing Sustainable Development Through Environmental Performance Monitoring: The Organisational Life Cycle Assessment
    Ahmed, Salik
    Liscio, Marco Ciro
    Sospiro, Paolo
    Voukkali, Irene
    Zorpas, Antonis A.
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 34 (02) : 2556 - 2570