Ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestion effluent using membrane distillation: Membrane fouling at different water vapor transfer scenarios

被引:1
|
作者
Shi, Mingfei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
He, Qingyao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Ruobing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sheng, Zengxin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Hongzhen [4 ]
Meers, Erik [4 ]
Yan, Shuiping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Engn, 1 Shizishan St, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Agr Univ, Technol & Equipment Ctr Carbon Neutral Agr, 1 Shizishan St, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Agr Equipment Midlower Yangtze River, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Green Chem & Technol, Resource Lab Biobased Resource Recovery, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Anaerobic digestion effluent; Ammonia recovery; Water vapor transfer; Direct contact membrane distillation; Membrane fouling; NITROGEN; REMOVAL; FLUX;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2024.159098
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Membrane fouling and its effect on ammonia recovery performance during anaerobic digestion (AD) effluent treatment were systematically investigated under a high water vapor transfer (i.e., conventional direct contact membrane distillation, DCMD) and a low water vapor transfer (i.e., isothermal DCMD) conditions. For the conventional DCMD scenario, three commercial hydrophobic membranes including 0.22 mu m pore-sized PP (PP0.22), 0.22 mu m pore-sized PTFE (PTFE-0.22), and 0.65 mu m pore-sized PTFE (PTFE-0.65), were evaluated to determine the influence of membrane properties on the mass transfer and membrane fouling behaviors. In a 4-h DCMD experiment, PTFE-0.65 treatment achieved the highest water and ammonia mass transfer, followed by PTFE-0.22 and PP-0.22 treatments. However, during a 12-d AD effluent treatment, the PTFE-0.65 treatment exhibited the largest decline in water flux (62.22 %), compared to PTFE-0.22 treatment (41.56 %) and PP-0.22 treatment (36.54 %). A similar trend was observed for the ammonia mass transfer coefficient, with the greatest reduction in PTFE-0.65 treatment (93.28 %), followed by PP-0.22 treatment (84.87 %), while PTFE-0.22 treatment showed a significantly smaller decrease (40 %). This smaller reduction in PTFE-0.22 treatment was attributed to its high porosity, which enhanced transmembrane ammonia transfer. The results showed that under a high water vapor transfer condition, a high initial water flux resulted in a high flux decline, indicating more severe membrane fouling, which was further supported by the highest concentration of foulants in the cleaning solution from PTFE-0.65 treatment, followed by PTFE-0.22 and PP-0.22 treatments. Comparatively, under an isothermal DCMD scenario, ammonia recovery remained stable over 25 days with a minimal fouling, highlighting the effectiveness of reduced water vapor transfer in mitigating the membrane fouling.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Capacitive nutrient removal and recovery from anaerobic membrane bioreactor effluent
    Ge, Zheng
    Ren, Zhiyong
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 253
  • [32] Membrane distillation for separation and recovery of valuable compounds from anaerobic digestates
    Aquino, Marco
    Santoro, Sergio
    Di Profio, Gianluca
    Russa, Mauro Francesco La
    Limonti, Carlo
    Straface, Salvatore
    D'Andrea, Giuseppe
    Curcio, Efrem
    Siciliano, Alessio
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 315
  • [33] Water regeneration from human urine by vacuum membrane distillation and analysis of membrane fouling characteristics
    Zhao, Zhi-Ping
    Xu, Liang
    Shang, Xin
    Chen, Kangcheng
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 118 : 369 - 376
  • [34] Understanding Ammonia and Water Transport in Direct Contact Membrane Distillation toward Selective Ammonia Recovery
    Yang, Kai
    Qin, Mohan
    ACS ES&T ENGINEERING, 2024, 4 (06): : 1321 - 1330
  • [35] Sustainable ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestion effluent through pretreating the feed by biomass ash
    Shi, Mingfei
    Duan, Haichao
    Feng, Liang
    Xiao, Man
    He, Qingyao
    Yan, Shuiping
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 307
  • [36] Fouling mitigation in membrane distillation processes during ammonia stripping from pig manure
    Zarebska, Agata
    Amor, Angel Cid
    Ciurkot, Klaudia
    Karring, Henrik
    Thygesen, Ole
    Andersen, Thomas Prangsgaard
    Hagg, May-Britt
    Christensen, Knud Villy
    Norddahl, Birgir
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2015, 484 : 119 - 132
  • [37] MASS TRANSFER IN MEMBRANE ABSORPTIONDESORPTION OF AMMONIA FROM AMMONIA WATER
    王世昌
    徐世昌
    秦英杰
    Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1993, (03) : 37 - 47
  • [38] Petrochemical wastewater treatment: Water recovery using membrane distillation
    Santos, Paula G.
    Scherer, Cintia M.
    Fisch, Adriano G.
    Rodrigues, Marco Antonio S.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 267 (267)
  • [39] Characterization of membranes for membrane distillation by atomic force microscopy and estimation of their water vapor transfer coefficients in vacuum membrane distillation process
    Khayet, M
    Khulbe, KC
    Matsuura, T
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2004, 238 (1-2) : 199 - 211
  • [40] Immobilized microalgae for anaerobic digestion effluent treatment in a photobioreactor-ultrafiltration system: Algal harvest and membrane fouling control
    Xie, Binghan
    Gong, Weijia
    Yu, Huarong
    Tang, Xiaobin
    Yan, Zhongsen
    Luo, Xinsheng
    Gan, Zhendong
    Wang, Tianyu
    Li, Guibai
    Liang, Heng
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 268 : 139 - 148