Ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestion effluent using membrane distillation: Membrane fouling at different water vapor transfer scenarios

被引:1
|
作者
Shi, Mingfei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
He, Qingyao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Ruobing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sheng, Zengxin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Hongzhen [4 ]
Meers, Erik [4 ]
Yan, Shuiping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Engn, 1 Shizishan St, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Agr Univ, Technol & Equipment Ctr Carbon Neutral Agr, 1 Shizishan St, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Agr Equipment Midlower Yangtze River, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Green Chem & Technol, Resource Lab Biobased Resource Recovery, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Anaerobic digestion effluent; Ammonia recovery; Water vapor transfer; Direct contact membrane distillation; Membrane fouling; NITROGEN; REMOVAL; FLUX;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2024.159098
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Membrane fouling and its effect on ammonia recovery performance during anaerobic digestion (AD) effluent treatment were systematically investigated under a high water vapor transfer (i.e., conventional direct contact membrane distillation, DCMD) and a low water vapor transfer (i.e., isothermal DCMD) conditions. For the conventional DCMD scenario, three commercial hydrophobic membranes including 0.22 mu m pore-sized PP (PP0.22), 0.22 mu m pore-sized PTFE (PTFE-0.22), and 0.65 mu m pore-sized PTFE (PTFE-0.65), were evaluated to determine the influence of membrane properties on the mass transfer and membrane fouling behaviors. In a 4-h DCMD experiment, PTFE-0.65 treatment achieved the highest water and ammonia mass transfer, followed by PTFE-0.22 and PP-0.22 treatments. However, during a 12-d AD effluent treatment, the PTFE-0.65 treatment exhibited the largest decline in water flux (62.22 %), compared to PTFE-0.22 treatment (41.56 %) and PP-0.22 treatment (36.54 %). A similar trend was observed for the ammonia mass transfer coefficient, with the greatest reduction in PTFE-0.65 treatment (93.28 %), followed by PP-0.22 treatment (84.87 %), while PTFE-0.22 treatment showed a significantly smaller decrease (40 %). This smaller reduction in PTFE-0.22 treatment was attributed to its high porosity, which enhanced transmembrane ammonia transfer. The results showed that under a high water vapor transfer condition, a high initial water flux resulted in a high flux decline, indicating more severe membrane fouling, which was further supported by the highest concentration of foulants in the cleaning solution from PTFE-0.65 treatment, followed by PTFE-0.22 and PP-0.22 treatments. Comparatively, under an isothermal DCMD scenario, ammonia recovery remained stable over 25 days with a minimal fouling, highlighting the effectiveness of reduced water vapor transfer in mitigating the membrane fouling.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A hybrid anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactor - membrane distillation for water reclamation: aquatic toxicity, membrane fouling characterization, and economic assessment
    Santos, Carolina Rodrigues
    Arcanjo, Gemima Santos
    de Souza Santos, Lucilaine Valeria
    Silva, Priscila Romana
    Mounteer, Ann H.
    de Cassia Moura Silva, Ubiana
    Santos, Vera Lucia
    Amaral, Miriam Cristina Santos
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 477
  • [22] Membrane fouling characterization and cleaning performance in anaerobic digestion effluent treatment by AGMD: Effect of feed pH
    Shi, Mingfei
    Xu, Ruobing
    Luo, Haihua
    Luo, Hongzhen
    Meers, Erik
    He, Qingyao
    Yan, Shuiping
    DESALINATION, 2025, 599
  • [23] Effect of adsorption/coagulation on membrane fouling in microfiltration process post-treating anaerobic digestion effluent
    Wu, Bing
    An, Yingyu
    Li, Yaozhong
    Wong, Fook Sin
    DESALINATION, 2009, 242 (1-3) : 183 - 192
  • [24] Peroxymonosulfate enhanced Fe(III) coagulation coupled with membrane distillation for ammonia recovery: Membrane fouling control process and mechanism
    Mu, Wucheng
    Han, Rui
    Zhu, Liang
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhang, Hao
    Jiang, Longjie
    Chen, Lin
    DESALINATION, 2023, 565
  • [25] Potential of membrane distillation for water recovery and reuse in water stress scenarios: Perspective from a bibliometric analysis
    Abejon, R.
    Romero, J.
    Quijada-Maldonado, E.
    DESALINATION, 2024, 591
  • [26] Economic optimization of hollow fiber membrane contactors for ammonia nitrogen recovery from anaerobic digestion effluents
    Rongwong, Wichitpan
    Bae, Tae-Hyun
    Jiraratananon, Ratana
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (06):
  • [27] Rejection of nutrients contained in an anaerobic digestion effluent using a forward osmosis membrane
    Onoda, Sosuke
    Masumori, Yuta
    Miyoshi, Taro
    Yasukawa, Masahiro
    Takahashi, Tomoki
    Matsuyama, Hideto
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (34) : 15748 - 15758
  • [28] Hierarchical Janus membrane with superior fouling and wetting resistance for efficient water recovery from challenging wastewater via membrane distillation
    Zhao, Shanshan
    Tao, Zhu
    Han, Muqiao
    Huang, Yu-xi
    Zhao, Bin
    Wang, Liang
    Tian, Xuelin
    Meng, Fangang
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2021, 618
  • [29] Hierarchical Janus membrane with superior fouling and wetting resistance for efficient water recovery from challenging wastewater via membrane distillation
    Zhao, Shanshan
    Tao, Zhu
    Han, Muqiao
    Huang, Yu-xi
    Zhao, Bin
    Wang, Liang
    Tian, Xuelin
    Meng, Fangang
    Journal of Membrane Science, 2022, 618
  • [30] Fouling formation in membrane contactors for methane recovery from anaerobic effluents
    Rongwong, Wichitpan
    Goh, Kunli
    Sethunga, G. S. M. D. P.
    Bae, Tae-Hyun
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2019, 573 : 534 - 543