Ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestion effluent using membrane distillation: Membrane fouling at different water vapor transfer scenarios

被引:1
|
作者
Shi, Mingfei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
He, Qingyao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Ruobing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sheng, Zengxin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Hongzhen [4 ]
Meers, Erik [4 ]
Yan, Shuiping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Engn, 1 Shizishan St, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Agr Univ, Technol & Equipment Ctr Carbon Neutral Agr, 1 Shizishan St, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Agr Equipment Midlower Yangtze River, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Green Chem & Technol, Resource Lab Biobased Resource Recovery, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Anaerobic digestion effluent; Ammonia recovery; Water vapor transfer; Direct contact membrane distillation; Membrane fouling; NITROGEN; REMOVAL; FLUX;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2024.159098
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Membrane fouling and its effect on ammonia recovery performance during anaerobic digestion (AD) effluent treatment were systematically investigated under a high water vapor transfer (i.e., conventional direct contact membrane distillation, DCMD) and a low water vapor transfer (i.e., isothermal DCMD) conditions. For the conventional DCMD scenario, three commercial hydrophobic membranes including 0.22 mu m pore-sized PP (PP0.22), 0.22 mu m pore-sized PTFE (PTFE-0.22), and 0.65 mu m pore-sized PTFE (PTFE-0.65), were evaluated to determine the influence of membrane properties on the mass transfer and membrane fouling behaviors. In a 4-h DCMD experiment, PTFE-0.65 treatment achieved the highest water and ammonia mass transfer, followed by PTFE-0.22 and PP-0.22 treatments. However, during a 12-d AD effluent treatment, the PTFE-0.65 treatment exhibited the largest decline in water flux (62.22 %), compared to PTFE-0.22 treatment (41.56 %) and PP-0.22 treatment (36.54 %). A similar trend was observed for the ammonia mass transfer coefficient, with the greatest reduction in PTFE-0.65 treatment (93.28 %), followed by PP-0.22 treatment (84.87 %), while PTFE-0.22 treatment showed a significantly smaller decrease (40 %). This smaller reduction in PTFE-0.22 treatment was attributed to its high porosity, which enhanced transmembrane ammonia transfer. The results showed that under a high water vapor transfer condition, a high initial water flux resulted in a high flux decline, indicating more severe membrane fouling, which was further supported by the highest concentration of foulants in the cleaning solution from PTFE-0.65 treatment, followed by PTFE-0.22 and PP-0.22 treatments. Comparatively, under an isothermal DCMD scenario, ammonia recovery remained stable over 25 days with a minimal fouling, highlighting the effectiveness of reduced water vapor transfer in mitigating the membrane fouling.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Water and green ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestion effluent by two-stage membrane distillation
    Shi, Mingfei
    Xiao, Man
    Feng, Liang
    Tu, Te
    He, Qingyao
    Yan, Shuiping
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2022, 49
  • [2] Investigation of membrane fouling behaviors triggered by different characteristics of anaerobic digestion effluent in membrane distillation
    Shi, Mingfei
    He, Qingyao
    Luo, Junlong
    Luo, Hongzhen
    Gao, Xinyi
    Meers, Erik
    Yan, Shuiping
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2024, 705
  • [3] Application of membrane distillation to anaerobic digestion effluent treatment: Identifying culprits of membrane fouling and scaling
    Yan, Zhongsen
    Yang, Haiyang
    Qu, Fangshu
    Zhang, Han
    Rong, Hongwei
    Yu, Huarong
    Liang, Heng
    Ding, An
    Li, Guibai
    Van der Bruggen, Bart
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 688 : 880 - 889
  • [4] Ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestion effluent by aeration-assisted membrane contactor
    Shi, Mingfei
    Zeng, Xiaorong
    Xiao, Man
    He, Qingyao
    Yan, Shuiping
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2022, 188 : 954 - 963
  • [5] Relating water vapor transfer to ammonia recovery from biogas slurry by vacuum membrane distillation
    He, Qingyao
    Tu, Te
    Yan, Shuiping
    Yang, Xing
    Duke, Mikel
    Zhang, Yanlin
    Zhao, Shuaifei
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 191 : 182 - 191
  • [6] Treatment of anaerobic digestion effluent using membrane distillation: Effects of feed acidification on pollutant removal, nutrient concentration and membrane fouling
    Yan, Zhongsen
    Liu, Ke
    Yu, Huarong
    Liang, Heng
    Xie, Binghan
    Li, Guibai
    Qu, Fangshu
    van der Bruggen, Bart
    DESALINATION, 2019, 449 : 6 - 15
  • [7] Enhancing sustainability: Upcycled membrane distillation for water and nutrient recovery from anaerobic membrane bioreactor effluent
    Park, Hyung-June
    Park, Hyeona
    Kim, Jinwoo
    Lee, Kwonki
    Naddeo, Vincenzo
    Choo, Kwang-Ho
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 498
  • [8] Ammonia recovery from agricultural wastes by membrane distillation: Fouling characterization and mechanism
    Zarebska, A.
    Nieto, D. Romero
    Christensen, K. V.
    Norddahl, B.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2014, 56 : 1 - 10
  • [9] Recovery of ammonia and phosphate from aquaculture effluent using a reactive vacuum membrane distillation-vacuum membrane distillation/nanofiltration hybrid system
    Loh, Chian Yong
    Koe, Aaron Zhen Yao
    Lim, Wei Jiun
    Ooi, Boon Seng
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 327
  • [10] Simultaneous ammonia recovery and water reclamation from brackish aquaculture effluent via reactive vacuum membrane distillation
    Loh, Chian Yong
    Koe, Aaron Zhen Yao
    Lim, Wei Jiun
    Chang, Ying Shi
    Ooi, Boon Seng
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2023, 53